TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Contact about Tricentis NeoLoad

Please fill out the form below to get in touch.

Tricentis

Connect with Tricentis

What are you interested in?

Already have an account?

You hereby consent to have TrustRadius share the information supplied on this form with Tricentis so that Tricentis and TrustRadius may contact you in regard to the information requested.

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    LoadComplete

    Score8.3 out of 10
    N/ASmartBear LoadComplete is a performance, stress and load testing tool for web and Rich Internet Applications, including ASP.NET, Ajax, Flash/Flex and Silverlight.

    $287

    one-time fee

    Tricentis NeoLoad

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/ATricentis NeoLoad is a solution for continuous performance testing software to automate API and application load testing. It was developed by the French company Neotys and acquired by Tricentis, along with the company, in March 2021.

    $20,000

    per year with 300 virtual users

    Pricing
    LoadCompleteTricentis NeoLoad
    Editions & Modules
    Subscription Starter
    $239
    per month 100 virtual users
    On-demand Starter
    $287
    one-time fee 100 virtual users
    Subscription Pro
    $699
    per month 1000 virtual users
    On-demand Pro
    $887
    one-time fee 1000 virtual users
    Subscription Premium
    $899
    per month 2500 virtual users
    On-demand Premium
    $1,139
    one-time fee 2500 virtual users
    Enterprise
    Let's chat
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    LoadCompleteTricentis NeoLoad
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
    Additional DetailsOn-demand plans contain a $4.99 monthly maintenance fee.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    LoadCompleteTricentis NeoLoad
    Considered Both Products
    SmartBear
    No answer on this topic
    Tricentis
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    No answers on this topic
    96%
    Would buy again
    26 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    No answers on this topic
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    25 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    No answers on this topic
    93%
    Happy with the feature set
    25 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    No answers on this topic
    95%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    18 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    No answers on this topic
    92%
    Implementation went as expected
    23 Answers
    Features
    LoadCompleteTricentis NeoLoad
    Load Testing
    Comparison of Load Testing features of LoadComplete and Tricentis NeoLoad
    Feature
    LoadComplete
    8.8
    4 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Tricentis NeoLoad
    -
    Ratings
    End to end performance management8.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integrated performance data9.93 Ratings00 Ratings
    Deployment model flexibility7.84 Ratings00 Ratings
    Real time monitoring7.94 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated anomaly detection9.83 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    LoadCompleteTricentis NeoLoad
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    JMeter
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    JMeter
    Score8.3 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    LoadCompleteTricentis NeoLoad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.9
    (4 ratings)
    7.6
    (33 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.5
    (2 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.3
    (4 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    3.6
    (4 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    7.3
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    LoadCompleteTricentis NeoLoad
    Likelihood to Recommend
    SmartBear
    I think that LoadComplete is adequate when you have Testcomplete. If LoadComplete is not paired with Testcomplete then there would be a bit of a learning curve. People who are already using Testcomplete will find it easy to start with LoadComplete but the tool itself has a lot to improve and support customization to suit our needs.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    While Tricentis NeoLoad supports SAP GUI protocols, recording and maintaining test scripts for complex SAP transactions (like those in the OTC module) can be cumbersome.


    For instance, we had challenges recording a VA01 (Sales Order Creation) transaction because of the dynamic nature of SAP screen fields and session handling. NeoLoad sometimes struggles to properly correlate or handle SAP’s SAPGUI Dynpro fields automatically.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    SmartBear
    • Easy and handy UI options to select
    • Good support from documentation
    • Eye-catching results
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • With Tricentis NeoLoad, we have control on the test dynamically. One can alter user count/volume even when test is in progress. This makes it a very cool tool as you can avoid running multiple tests eventually saves a lot of time.
    • Tricentis NeoLoad user paths are very well structured. End points can be identified and tweaked easily especially when a large list of endpoints are part of the neoload project.
    • Tricentis NeoLoad results comparison is one of the cool options. We can compare previous tests against the current one to see the exact delta between transaction metrics. This helps in gauging the application behaviour with changes deployed
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    SmartBear
    • Some graphs remain empty, I would like a description of why a certain graph cannot gather data.
    • Allow user to customize the graph.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Ease of use: Some users find certain features or aspects of the interface to be confusing or hard to use. Improving the overall usability of the tool could make it more accessible and easier for users to get up and running with it.
    • Integration with other tools: Tricentis NeoLoad does not have many integrations with other tools. Adding more integrations with popular tools and platforms could make it easier for users to work with Tricentis NeoLoad as part of their overall workflow.
    • Mobile testing: Some users wish that Tricentis NeoLoad had more robust support for testing the performance of mobile applications. This could include the ability to simulate different mobile devices and networks, as well as the ability to test the performance of native mobile apps.
    • Cloud support: Tricentis NeoLoad does not have as much support for cloud-based applications and infrastructure. Adding more support for testing the performance of applications hosted in the cloud could be a useful feature for some users.
    • Advanced scripting capabilities: While Tricentis NeoLoad does offer some scripting capabilities, it would be nice to have more advanced options for customizing and automating load testing scenarios. Adding more advanced scripting capabilities could make it easier for users to create complex load testing scenarios.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    We find NeoLoad easy to use compared to their competitors. It requires minimal coding knowledge, also it is easy to train newcomers with NeoLoad. It also offers good integration and automation capability where with less code you can automate your testing process
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    SmartBear
    Usability is really good because being an enterprise tool that might be an easy option to convince users to try this tool. It has a lot of easy-to-use, cool options.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    In being flexible to meet all needs, it is very bare bones by design, but this could be a considered a feature and not a bug.
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    SmartBear
    Customer support is good. If any concerns are raised, they are usually resolved soon, but when questioned about a feature LoadComplete does not support, it usually takes more time to resolve.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    This is the only area where we strongly feel Tricentis needs to improve. Their support process is inadequate, representatives are not so capable of providing solutions at one shot without consulting their internal engineering teams. Most importantly, the time they take to resolve simple issues is huge and at many times hampered our work.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    SmartBear
    No answers on this topic
    Tricentis
    1. Their documentation is scattered over many places like GitHub read me files, their internal website etc;
    2. Support team takes huge time just to acknowledge our ticket
    3. No support to automatically migrate scripts from competetor tool into
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    SmartBear
    JMeter is a more flexible tool because it gives the possibility to write scripts.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    When we used Apache JMeter we faced some problems like less documentation is available for integrating tools, and some integrations have not yet been deployed. Very few plugin updates are made. Since customer support is an open source tool, it is a major problem. While Tricentis Neoload provides better documentations and customer services.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    SmartBear
    • This tool always yields eye-catching results. It has good support from the documentation. Also, it generates detailed reports which is a very good thing.
    • There is also a record and play feature in LoadComplete which means all applications can be recorded like Applications Servers’ Metric and so on.
    • This tool has a good reporting and record playback due to which I will recommend it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tricentis
    • Performance testing is like an insurance. An online store which is not available causes a loss of sales. Without a performance test you do not know if it might happen. The invest into performance tests reduces the risk of loosing sales. The flexible license model of NeoLoad allows or customers to choose reasonable and suiteable rate.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots

    Tricentis NeoLoad Screenshots

    Screenshot of Code-less design — loops, conditions, and other drag and drop controls simplify test design creation, and JavaScript can still be used for extremely advanced cases.Screenshot of CI/CD integrations — collaborate across dev, QA, operations, and business teams to create a standardized performance testing approach throughout the enterprise.Screenshot of Real-time test results — analyze test results live to react to an anomaly before the test is over. And leverage in-depth test reporting when the test is completed.Screenshot of Collaborate on test result as the test is runningScreenshot of Configure SaaS-based performance testScreenshot of Dashboard for team analysis