LogDNA vs. Logz.io vs. Tanzu Application Catalog
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
LogDNA | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | LogDNA headquartered in Mountain View offers their eponymous cloud log management or on-prem/self-hosted log management solution. | N/A |
Logz.io | Score8.3 out of 10 | Small Businesses (1-50 employees) | Logz.io in Boston offers their enterprise-grade log analytics application, oriented towards providing data security and eliminating the need for capacity management. | $0.84 per ingested GB 3 day of log retention |
Tanzu Application Catalog | Score8.7 out of 10 | N/A | The Tanzu Application Catalog (or Bitnami) provides packaged applications for any platform. The platform delivers and maintains a catalog of 130+ ready-to-run server applications and development environments in partnership with cloud providers including Amazon, Google, Microsoft, and Oracle, driving over 1.5 million deployments per month. Bitnami was acquired by VMware in 2019. | $0.50 per month |
| LogDNA | Logz.io | Tanzu Application Catalog | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
|
| |||||||||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LogDNA | Logz.io | Tanzu Application Catalog | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Considered Multiple Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | |||
| Would buy again | |||
No answers on this topic | 67% Would buy again 4 Answers | 100% Would buy again 6 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 6 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 6 Answers | |
| LogDNA | Logz.io | Tanzu Application Catalog | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Platform-as-a-Service |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| LogDNA | Logz.io | Tanzu Application Catalog | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | SolarWinds Papertrail Score8.9 out of 10 | No answers on this topic | IBM Cloud Foundry Score8.5 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | SolarWinds Kiwi Syslog Server Score8.1 out of 10 | No answers on this topic | IBM Cloud Private Score9.6 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | SolarWinds Loggly Score7.7 out of 10 | NetBrain Technologies Score8.8 out of 10 | AWS Elastic Beanstalk Score8.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| LogDNA | Logz.io | Tanzu Application Catalog | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.0 | 9.0 | 8.8 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 8.0 | 9.0 | 9.0 |
| Availability | - | 9.0 | - |
| Performance | - | 9.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 10.0 | 8.1 | 10.0 |
| Configurability | - | 9.0 | - |
| Contract Terms and Pricing Model | - | 9.0 | - |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.0 | - |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.0 | - |
| Professional Services | - | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 9.0 | - |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 9.0 | - |
| LogDNA | Logz.io | Tanzu Application Catalog | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
|
| ScreenShots |





