TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Looker Studio vs. Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Looker Studio

    Score8.2 out of 10
    N/ALooker Studio is a data visualization platform that transforms data into meaningful presentations and dashboards with customized reporting tools.

    $9

    per month per user per project

    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise

    Score8.9 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft R Open and Revolution R Enterprise are big data R distribution for servers, Hadoop clusters, and data warehouses. Microsoft acquired original developer Revolution Analytics in 2016. Microsoft R is available in two editions: Microsoft R Open (formerly Revolution R Open) and Revolution R Enterprise.N/A
    Pricing
    Looker StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Editions & Modules
    Looker Studio Pro
    $9
    per month per user per project
    Looker Studio
    No charge
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Looker StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    YesNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    Looker StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Considered Both Products
    Google
    No answer on this topic
    Microsoft
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    95%
    Would buy again
    40 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Delivers good value for the price
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    38 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Happy with the feature set
    95%
    Happy with the feature set
    40 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    97%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    31 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Implementation went as expected
    89%
    Implementation went as expected
    33 Answers
    No answers on this topic
    Features
    Looker StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    BI Standard Reporting
    Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    7.0
    62 Ratings
    14% below category average
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Pixel Perfect reports6.643 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customizable dashboards7.361 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Formatting Templates7.259 Ratings00 Ratings
    Ad-hoc Reporting
    Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    7.7
    61 Ratings
    2% below category average
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Drill-down analysis6.851 Ratings00 Ratings
    Formatting capabilities7.057 Ratings00 Ratings
    Integration with R or other statistical packages7.129 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report sharing and collaboration9.759 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Output and Scheduling
    Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    8.1
    60 Ratings
    1% below category average
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Publish to Web8.453 Ratings00 Ratings
    Publish to PDF8.753 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Versioning8.139 Ratings00 Ratings
    Report Delivery Scheduling7.942 Ratings00 Ratings
    Delivery to Remote Servers7.524 Ratings00 Ratings
    Data Discovery and Visualization
    Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    6.6
    60 Ratings
    16% below category average
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    -
    Ratings
    Pre-built visualization formats (heatmaps, scatter plots etc.)7.160 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location Analytics / Geographic Visualization7.757 Ratings00 Ratings
    Predictive Analytics5.330 Ratings00 Ratings
    Pattern Recognition and Data Mining6.36 Ratings00 Ratings
    Platform Connectivity
    Comparison of Platform Connectivity features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    5.3
    3 Ratings
    45% below category average
    Connect to Multiple Data Sources00 Ratings6.13 Ratings
    Extend Existing Data Sources00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Automatic Data Format Detection00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    MDM Integration00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
    Data Exploration
    Comparison of Data Exploration features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    7.0
    3 Ratings
    19% below category average
    Visualization00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Interactive Data Analysis00 Ratings7.03 Ratings
    Data Preparation
    Comparison of Data Preparation features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    4.8
    3 Ratings
    52% below category average
    Interactive Data Cleaning and Enrichment00 Ratings5.13 Ratings
    Data Transformations00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
    Data Encryption00 Ratings3.01 Ratings
    Built-in Processors00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Platform Data Modeling
    Comparison of Platform Data Modeling features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    6.0
    3 Ratings
    34% below category average
    Multiple Model Development Languages and Tools00 Ratings5.03 Ratings
    Automated Machine Learning00 Ratings5.02 Ratings
    Single platform for multiple model development00 Ratings8.03 Ratings
    Self-Service Model Delivery00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
    Model Deployment
    Comparison of Model Deployment features of Looker Studio and Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Feature
    Looker Studio
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    6.5
    2 Ratings
    27% below category average
    Flexible Model Publishing Options00 Ratings6.02 Ratings
    Security, Governance, and Cost Controls00 Ratings6.92 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Looker StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Small Businesses
    Chartio (discontinued)
    Score7.5 out of 10
    RapidMiner
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Jet Reports
    Score9.5 out of 10
    Anaconda
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Kibana
    Score8.4 out of 10
    IBM Watson Studio
    Score10 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Looker StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (63 ratings)
    6.0
    (5 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    8.4
    (14 ratings)
    7.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    6.7
    (10 ratings)
    8.0
    (2 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Looker StudioMicrosoft R Open / Revolution R Enterprise
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Google
    Visualizing cross-channel campaign performance can blend data from a few different sources to compare performance metrics like spend, clicks, and conversions side-by-side in a single view, which helps in quick budget reallocation decisions. When dealing with massive volumes of data (millions of rows) or highly complex queries, Looker Studio dashboards can become slow, laggy, or even crash. Performance issues are a frequent complaint when working with large datasets, making it unsuitable for enterprise-level companies
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    If you are a MS shop specifically, or have more generic data requirement needs from Microsoft sourced data this will work well. If you have a lot of disparate data across a number of unique platforms/cloud systems/3rd party hosted data warehouses then this product will have issues or a lack of documentation on the net. Performance-wise this product is equal to other R platforms out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Google
    • Breath of data - the number of ways to interrogate the data is endless, and the options to view metrics alongside each other make for comprehensive datasets.
    • Data visualisation and customisation - the options for presenting data and separating out across pages allow for clean visuals and segmented information.
    • Easy shareability/usability - a quick and simple tool to introduce colleagues to, and easy to grant access for them to be able to view the data, without having to understand the setup itself.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • It allows distributed algorithm runs on Hadoop HDFS cluster
    • It allows using different file formats such as SAS7BAT files or complex files in tab or comma delimited making data munging easier
    • It provides scalable solutions by allowing users to re-use R scripts and distributing the computing over nodes through RHadoop
    Read full review
    Cons
    Google
    • It needs better handling of complex logic. We often need workarounds to perform complex custom calculations, and it can be really unpleasant at times.
    • Felt it got slow with a larger data set, and in one minor report, we had to set up time filters so that calculations during spikes could be traced more quickly.
    • Compare to competition they need to improve with notification things.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Very steep learning curve... for such a quick and useful tool the learning curve is unacceptable.
    • Very dangerous in the wrong hands. Because most add-ons are pre-written, you have to trust the community that malicious script is not used.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Google
    It is the simplest and least expensive way for us to automate our reporting at this time. I like the ability to customize literally everything about each report, and the ability to send out reports automatically in emails. The only issue we have been having recently is a technical glitch in the automatic email report. Sadly, there is almost no support for this tool from Google, but is also free, so that is important to take into consideration
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    In general, Revolution Analytics brings a lot of value to the organization. The renewal decision would be based on return on investment in terms of quantified actionable insights that are getting generated against the cost of the product. Additionally, market brand of the tool and reputation risk in terms of possible acquisition and its impact to overall organizational analytic strategy would be considered as well.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Google
    Looker Studio is easy to use, and it offers a sufficient variety of predefined visualizations to choose from. It's easy for us, and anyone can set up basic reporting without extensive data visualization skills. The interface layout is easy to understand, and it doesn't take long to get used to.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    It is good, easy to use, improvements are being made to the product and more info being shared in the community. It just needs some more time to become more integrated to other platforms and tools/data out there.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Google
    I give it a lower support rating because it seems like our Dev team hasn't gotten the support they need to set up our database to connect. Seems like we hit a roadblock and the project got put on pause for dev. That sucks for me because it is harder to get the dev team to focus on it if they don't get the help they need to set it up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Generally support comes through the forums and user generated channels which are helpful, easy to access, quickly turned around and provided by knowledgeable users. However the support channels are not employees and the channels are often used as a way to learn quick difficult elements of R. Better design, users interface and tutorial options would alleviate the need for this sort of interaction.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Google
    Looker Studio is far easier to implement, stand up, and learn. The interface is simpler and user-friendly for various levels of data visualization/analysis knowledge and experience. The biggest benefit of Looker Studio, however, is its ease of connection to GA data and speed. Furthermore, since it is an online program/tool, it requires less CPU/battery/storage on the user's device.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    The two are different products for different purposes. But for someone who has little or no experience in R programming, Power BI would be better for starting with. Having said that, Microsoft R is built on R, thus allowing for customization of complex calculations not typically available otherwise.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Google
    • Free, so the only investment is time
    • Because it doesn't have native support of non-Google sources, it can cost more money than Tableau
    • The time spent formatting the templates or building connectors can have a negative impact on ROI
    • As a agency, charging for the reporting service is profitable after the first month or two after building the dashboard.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Helped save company money versus buying other stat software
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots