TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/AThreatDown (formerly Malwarebytes for Business), combines Malwarebytes' endpoint security capabilities in four bundles. The basic Core tier includes incident response, Next-gen AV, device control, vulnerability assessments, and the ability to block unwanted application.

    $345

    per year 5 endpoints (minimum)

    Splunk SOAR

    Score9.1 out of 10
    N/ASplunk now offers a security orchestration, automation, and response (SOAR) platform via its acquisition of Phantom. Splunk Security Orchestration and Automation (Splunk SOAR) provides playbook automation and is available as a standalone solution.N/A
    Pricing
    ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesSplunk SOAR
    Editions & Modules
    Core
    $345
    per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
    Advanced
    $395
    per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
    Elite
    $495
    per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
    Ultimate
    $595
    per year per endpoint (minimum 5)
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesSplunk SOAR
    Free Trial
    YesNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional DetailsOptional Add-Ons include server and mobile device protection. Server protection ranges from $129 to $179 per annum depending on service tier. Mobile security is $10 per device, no matter the service tier. A 10% discount is offered for choosing a two-year billing plan.—
    More Pricing Information
    Community Pulse
    ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesSplunk SOAR
    Considered Both Products
    Malwarebytes
    No answer on this topic
    Cisco
    No answer on this topic
    Key User Insights
    Would buy again
    93%
    Would buy again
    13 Answers
    100%
    Would buy again
    41 Answers
    Delivers good value for the price
    93%
    Delivers good value for the price
    13 Answers
    100%
    Delivers good value for the price
    34 Answers
    Happy with the feature set
    86%
    Happy with the feature set
    12 Answers
    100%
    Happy with the feature set
    41 Answers
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    92%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    12 Answers
    90%
    Lived up to sales and marketing promises
    26 Answers
    Implementation went as expected
    100%
    Implementation went as expected
    13 Answers
    97%
    Implementation went as expected
    37 Answers
    Features
    ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesSplunk SOAR
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes and Splunk SOAR
    Feature
    ThreatDown, powered by Malwarebytes
    8.8
    15 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Splunk SOAR
    -
    Ratings
    Anti-Exploit Technology8.514 Ratings00 Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)9.215 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Management9.715 Ratings00 Ratings
    Hybrid Deployment Support8.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Infection Remediation8.614 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Management8.713 Ratings00 Ratings
    Malware Detection8.815 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesSplunk SOAR
    Small Businesses
    SentinelOne Singularity
    Score9 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    BlackBerry Protect (CylancePROTECT)
    Score9.1 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    ESET PROTECT
    Score8.8 out of 10
    Palo Alto Networks Cortex XSOAR
    Score1.1 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesSplunk SOAR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    8.3
    (15 ratings)
    8.1
    (40 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    7.5
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    10.0
    (3 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (40 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (5 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    8.2
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    ThreatDown, powered by MalwarebytesSplunk SOAR
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Malwarebytes
    I think Malwarebytes is the best anti-malware company. I think it is well-suited for any situation and any device. I think Malwarebytes does the best on Windows and on MacOS. Also, Malwarebytes is always improving, and you can tell they are a company that stays on top of cybersecurity trends. If you have a tight budget or looking for the cheapest solution, then Malwarebytes may not be the solution for you. To clarify, I don't think Malwarebytes is that much more expensive compared to its closest competitors.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Our company has very complex and dynamic security operations because of the large number of security tools and systems that we need to manage and coordinate. Moreover, it helps us to meet many regulatory and compliance requirements because it helps us to automate and document our security operations. We also use it to streamline our security operations and improve our response to potential threats.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Malwarebytes
    • Protects against malware - No matter how much training you give end users on social hacking, there is always a breach at some point.
    • Protects against ransomware - Ransomware could spell disaster for a company...it could literally shut the doors for good.
    • Centralized administration - Without a terrific centralized method to manage all the systems being protected, it would require an extra position just to maintain all endpoints.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • Its security orchestration and integration capability that supports multiple tools.
    • Easy coding that automates our security actions.
    • Enables us to easily collaborate and respond to security issues faster.
    • Splunk SOAR is a flexible product that is easy to deploy.
    • Efficient tracking and monitoring capability.
    • Excellent real-time reporting functionality.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Malwarebytes
    • poor customer service
    • dashboard says product is working EVEN THOUGH IT WAS NOT!
    • slow response to concerns that should be easy to remedy
    • creates baggage which caused certain computers and the network to run more slowly
    • caused 3 computers on our network top have windows errors and network issues
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • A lack of instruction It can be difficult to contact the support staff. Limited experience from current users.
    • It takes some effort to set up and learn new technology at first. More assistance is required from the support staff. The product's price needs to go down.
    • Cost of the larger version.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Malwarebytes
    When I first used the tool in my home systems MANY years ago, I wished for a Business version. I was once at a focus group for a major antivirus company, and one attendee’s feedback to “what could we do better?” was “buy out MalwareBytes and add it to your tool”. I’ve used the Business version since it first became available, and have continued to be a dedicated user through the many iterations and improvements
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    As we already have a lot of clients being catered with Splunk SOAR and because Splunk SOAR is robust and efficient, we are already using it, and we have understood the product to a certain extent, I feel we are personally more enticed to use and scale it to a lot of business.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Malwarebytes
    It simply works. It doesn't require the hand-holding and monitoring that some other solutions do. It's simple to deploy and maintain, and adding custom content such as Exceptions require minimal effort. I’ve had to add a few exceptions for internal-use, in-house-developed tools, but it’s quite simple to do so within the online interface
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Building playbooks through the visual editor is fine for basic tasks, but once you start chaining complex logic or integrating 3rd party APIs you hit a wall that requires deep scripting knowledge.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Performance
    Malwarebytes
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    We are able to automate almost every one of our use cases, even our threat-hunting, and threat intel procedures. We have 20+ playbooks and cover almost everything, even searching logs into Splunk, looking into TIP and external systems, enrichment, and collecting evidence for analysts; it can perform concurrent playbooks running.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Malwarebytes
    As I mentioned, we have only email support. Their phone support was very expensive. If we ever have any issues, we have to email them and wait for their response. In most cases, I have figured out the issue on my own. The software is very stable so we haven't used their support much.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Splunk Support is always great! In addition the Community is very efficient and active.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    In-Person Training
    Malwarebytes
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I never followed an in-person training, I gave my evaluation based on the online training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Online Training
    Malwarebytes
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    I followed training for Phantom admins and it opened a world for me
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Malwarebytes
    I first implemented this more than 10 years ago, when it required an in-site setup with SQL Server (or SQL Express), and even that was pretty easy. With the move to centralized web management some treats ago, it’s become even easier to deploy
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    I already said that the main key insight is the knowledge of Phantom, so a detailed training for all the people involeved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Malwarebytes
    It's no contest. Cisco AMP, Umbrella and Endpoint use vast amounts of resources and provide little protection when compared with Malwarebytes. One client recently replaced Cisco with MWB and found over 7,300 vulnerabilities on 352 endpoints, including 120 listed as Critical and 7,180 listed as High, with CVE's dating back to 2008.
    Read full review
    Cisco
    Splunk Phantom integrates well with Splunk ES and has many integrations. One thing that I liked about XSOAR as compared to Phantom is that it has an "app-store" where you can download not only app integrations (similar to Phantom) but Playbooks and dashboards as well.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Malwarebytes
    No answers on this topic
    Cisco
    me and the customers I encountered found it flexible and scalable
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Malwarebytes
    • The ease of remediation has saved our IT team a number of hours manually installing, for example, the free version of Malwarebytes to remove infections, and then cleaning the machine up. Being able to centrally send commands to clean the device is much more efficient.
    • The centralised management has also alerted us to infections on machines that we might not otherwise have known about, as the existing AV had not detected them, saving us potential data loss, or system damage.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cisco
    • The playbooks are valuable. They are the core component. Being able to implement and build a code process to work through and scale out what we want to do is valuable
    • Before its use, analyzing each email would take at least 15 to 20 minutes, with some complex cases taking up to 30 minutes...With the automation provided by Splunk Phantom, we could significantly reduce the amount of time and human effort required to complete this task
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots