TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance vs. Microsoft Dynamics SL vs. Oracle Hyperion (legacy)

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance

    Score6.6 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics 365 Finance is used to automate and modernize global financial operations. The application can monitor performance in real time, predict future outcomes, and support data-driven decisions to drive business growth.

    $2,520

    per year per user

    Microsoft Dynamics SL

    Score5.1 out of 10
    N/AMicrosoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family. This product was acquired from Solomon 2000. The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.N/A

    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)

    Score7.5 out of 10
    N/AOracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.N/A
    Pricing
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Editions & Modules
    Dynamics 365 Finance
    $2520
    per year per user
    Dynamics 365 Finance Premium
    $3600
    per year per user
    No answers on this topic
    No answers on this topic
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Free Trial
    YesNoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Payroll Management
    Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    5.0
    1 Ratings
    41% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.5
    2 Ratings
    12% above category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Pay calculation5.01 Ratings9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reimbursement management5.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Direct deposit files00 Ratings9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Customization
    Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    6.8
    2 Ratings
    11% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    6 Ratings
    23% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    API for custom integration5.52 Ratings6.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Plug-ins8.01 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Security
    Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    8.3
    2 Ratings
    1% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.7
    10 Ratings
    3% above category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Single sign-on capability9.02 Ratings7.49 Ratings00 Ratings
    Role-based user permissions7.52 Ratings10.09 Ratings00 Ratings
    Reporting & Analytics
    Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    6.7
    2 Ratings
    15% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    8.0
    10 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Dashboards6.52 Ratings8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standard reports7.02 Ratings8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
    Custom reports6.52 Ratings8.010 Ratings00 Ratings
    General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
    Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    8.1
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    7.1
    11 Ratings
    8% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Accounts payable7.52 Ratings6.011 Ratings00 Ratings
    Accounts receivable8.02 Ratings6.08 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Bank reconciliation8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Expense management8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Time tracking7.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Fixed asset management6.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-currency support9.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Multi-division support9.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Regulations compliance8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Electronic tax filing8.02 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Self-service portal9.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Global Financial Support9.52 Ratings6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Primary and Secondary Ledgers9.52 Ratings6.63 Ratings00 Ratings
    Intercompany Accounting9.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Localizations7.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Journals and Reconciliations8.52 Ratings3.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Enterprise Accounting9.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Configurable Accounting5.52 Ratings8.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Centralized Rules Framework6.52 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Standardized Processes7.02 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Inventory Management
    Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    5.0
    1 Ratings
    37% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    5.7
    6 Ratings
    33% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory tracking5.01 Ratings5.06 Ratings00 Ratings
    Location management5.01 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing module5.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order Management
    Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    5.0
    1 Ratings
    39% below category average
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.2
    4 Ratings
    25% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Pricing5.01 Ratings6.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    Order entry5.01 Ratings3.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost of goods sold5.01 Ratings7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    End-to-end order visibility5.01 Ratings00 Ratings00 Ratings
    Credit card processing00 Ratings7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Subledger and Financial Process
    Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    5.7
    4 Ratings
    28% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Billing Management00 Ratings6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cash and Asset Management00 Ratings7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Travel & Expense Management00 Ratings5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting00 Ratings6.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Period Close00 Ratings6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Financial Management
    Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    4.7
    3 Ratings
    47% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Budgeting and Forecasting00 Ratings7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Costing00 Ratings6.33 Ratings00 Ratings
    Cost Capture00 Ratings2.12 Ratings00 Ratings
    Capital Project Management00 Ratings8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Project Revenue Recognition00 Ratings2.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Grants Management
    Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.3
    1 Ratings
    17% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Award Lifecycle Management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Manufacturing
    Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    22% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Production Management00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Supply Chain
    Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    6.0
    1 Ratings
    20% below category average
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    -
    Ratings
    Inventory Planning00 Ratings6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
    Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    10.0
    22 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Long-term financial planning00 Ratings00 Ratings10.017 Ratings
    Financial budgeting00 Ratings00 Ratings10.020 Ratings
    Forecasting00 Ratings00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Scenario modeling00 Ratings00 Ratings10.016 Ratings
    Management reporting00 Ratings00 Ratings10.021 Ratings
    Analytics and Reporting
    Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Feature
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
    -
    Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics SL
    -
    Ratings
    Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
    8.2
    20 Ratings
    9% below category average
    Personalized dashboards00 Ratings00 Ratings8.018 Ratings
    Color-coded scorecards00 Ratings00 Ratings7.115 Ratings
    KPIs00 Ratings00 Ratings9.917 Ratings
    Cost and profitability analysis00 Ratings00 Ratings9.917 Ratings
    Key Performance Indicator setting00 Ratings00 Ratings8.015 Ratings
    Benchmarking with external data00 Ratings00 Ratings6.013 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Small Businesses
    QuickBooks Self-Employed (discontinued)
    Score4.3 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Medium-sized Companies
    MYOB
    Score8.3 out of 10
    Zoho One
    Score9.2 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    Enterprises
    Microsoft Dynamics GP
    Score5.5 out of 10
    Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
    Score4.8 out of 10
    No answers on this topic
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    6.0
    (3 ratings)
    5.0
    (18 ratings)
    10.0
    (23 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    5.4
    (8 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    6.5
    (3 ratings)
    3.0
    (7 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Availability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.9
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Performance
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.5
    (4 ratings)
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    Online Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Product Scalability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    1.4
    (2 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 FinanceMicrosoft Dynamics SLOracle Hyperion (legacy)
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Microsoft
    Its well suited for medium and large organizations that needs strong financial control , automated workflows , inter-company accounting and real-time reporting . It works wonderfully with all the Microsoft products . However , it may be less useful for small businesses as it requires a good investment in implementation , customization , licensing and user training
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Microsoft
    • Financial reporting
    • Multi-company consolidation
    • Hub and spoke setup
    • Web-based access
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
    • Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
    • A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
    • Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
    • Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
    • Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • This product handles budgeting by Employee and/or Position very well. It is highly flexible and allows Hyperion administrators the ability to develop a planning application that fits a variety of different business needs.
    • It is great at calculating benefits using business rules to automate the population of these fringe costs in the overall budget planning process. This greatly reduces user error.
    • It allows you to seed the operating budget based on changes to key drivers, such as percentage increases, flat dollar increases and more detailed changes using business rules.
    • Allows visibility into the plans for each unit across the organization, rolled up into an overall budget for the campus.
    • It handles the creation of budgets with multiple chartfield segments or dimensions, which most other budgeting systems cannot handle well. It can aggregate these very quickly.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Microsoft
    • More clarity on features going away
    • New feature showcases
    • Demonstrations for how things were intended to be used
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
    • I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
    • Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • One pain point for us is the consolidation and translation process. Needing to translate the data over and over again is frustrating and there is no visibility into how many users are running a translation. If multiple users attempt to translate the same data set, say goodbye to your performance but you have no way of knowing! (Unless you want to pull up a task audit which is not a very realistic expectation). It has the been the quickest way for us to bring the system to it's knees. The consolidation process performs in direct correlation to the complexity of the calculation/consolidation rules. So, while the product is extremely flexible, you still have to be careful how you design your rules and calculations to make sure that you do it on the smallest subset of data as possible to avoid large processing times. This makes sense, but requires some significant expertise that most organizations do not have in-house.
    • The Hyperion Financial Reporting product is ridiculously outdated and clunky to use. The interface for designing reports is not intuitive, and not easy to modify once a report is built. I think there must be a strategic decision to move away from it and go to something more like Oracle BI because I just can't understand why in the world they don't update the reporting product. It also requires a significant level of expertise to be able to use. Not a great solution at all if you want multiple end-users to create reports in something other than Excel. Nobody except the HFM admin (which I used to be) in our company even touches this module.
    • Another pain point is the amount of IT support that is required to run this thing, and again, specialized knowledge of Hyperion products and how they work is required for IT to adequately support it. This goes for application servers and the Oracle database that the applications are running on.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
    Read full review
    Usability
    Microsoft
    As the UI is modern and user friendly which makes it easy to navigate . The dashboard , workspace and personalized view helps to access the right set of information with ease
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Reliability and Availability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Microsoft
    They are good, but there is always room to be better.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Microsoft
    Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is more robust, and can handle larger, more complex business operations, and have better delineation between corporate management and divisions in a company, but it is not flexible, nor easy to change. It is complex, inflexible, and difficult to incorporate new workflows or business rules to accommodate changes in the business. We have changed over the past decade and while F&O is big and robust, it is not nimble.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work permits.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Scalability
    Microsoft
    No answers on this topic
    Microsoft
    Since the backbone of the database is MS SQLServer, the database can be easily scaled.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    No answers on this topic
    Return on Investment
    Microsoft
    • Because F&O is not very nimble, we are looking to reimplement
    • The lack of interoperability has hindered our ability to use external tools to supplement shortcomings of the product
    • The inflexibility has lead to great frustration from team leads
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Microsoft
    • More time is spent on manipulating reports which can and should be automated.
    • Lack of electronic invoicing process and other green technology features creates more cost on printing and storage costs.
    • The lack of a user friendly interface requires more training and a bigger learning curve for staff.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Discontinued Products
    • Oracle Hyperion allows us to automate and consolidate financial data that used to be performed manually in spreadsheets. From that perspective the ROI is huge.
    • Oracle Hyperion functionality is extensive and allows us to perform most functions for planning, consolidating and reporting on our financial data.
    • One negative with Oracle Hyperion is that it is complicated to implement and maintain. It takes expertise at all levels (infrastructure and management) to realize the benefits from it.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots