Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is used to automate and modernize global financial operations. The application can monitor performance in real time, predict future outcomes, and support data-driven decisions to drive business growth.
$2,520
per year per user
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Score5.1 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft Dynamics SL is one of the ERP products in the Dynamics family.
This product was acquired from Solomon 2000.
The product is typically used by SMBs, particularly in project-based businesses (e.g. construction). It has strong accounting and project management capabilities.
N/A
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Score7.5 out of 10
N/A
Oracle's Corporate Performance Management suite was acquired from Hyperion in 2007. Hyperion customers are encouraged to migrate to Oracle Fusion Cloud EPM.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Editions & Modules
Dynamics 365 Finance
$2520
per year per user
Dynamics 365 Finance Premium
$3600
per year per user
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Free Trial
Yes
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Microsoft Dynamics SL
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
41% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.5
2 Ratings
12% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
5.01 Ratings
9.62 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
6.8
2 Ratings
11% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
6 Ratings
23% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
5.52 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.01 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.7
10 Ratings
3% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
9.02 Ratings
7.49 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.52 Ratings
10.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
6.7
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
8.0
10 Ratings
6% above category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Dashboards
6.52 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.02 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
6.52 Ratings
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
8.1
2 Ratings
6% above category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
7.1
11 Ratings
8% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
7.52 Ratings
6.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
8.02 Ratings
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
9.52 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.52 Ratings
6.63 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.52 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
9.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
5.52 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
6.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
7.02 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
37% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
6 Ratings
33% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
5.01 Ratings
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
5.01 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing module
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
39% below category average
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.2
4 Ratings
25% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Pricing
5.01 Ratings
6.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
5.01 Ratings
3.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
5.01 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
5.7
4 Ratings
28% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Billing Management
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
00 Ratings
6.32 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
4.7
3 Ratings
47% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
00 Ratings
7.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
00 Ratings
6.33 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
00 Ratings
2.12 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
00 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.3
1 Ratings
17% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
22% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Production Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
6.0
1 Ratings
20% below category average
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
-
Ratings
Inventory Planning
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting
Comparison of Budgeting, Planning, and Forecasting features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Microsoft Dynamics SL
-
Ratings
Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
10.0
22 Ratings
8% above category average
Long-term financial planning
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.017 Ratings
Financial budgeting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.020 Ratings
Forecasting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
Scenario modeling
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.016 Ratings
Management reporting
00 Ratings
00 Ratings
10.021 Ratings
Analytics and Reporting
Comparison of Analytics and Reporting features of Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance and Microsoft Dynamics SL and Oracle Hyperion (legacy)
Its well suited for medium and large organizations that needs strong financial control , automated workflows , inter-company accounting and real-time reporting . It works wonderfully with all the Microsoft products . However , it may be less useful for small businesses as it requires a good investment in implementation , customization , licensing and user training
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For a small to mid-size business, MS Dynamics SL is effective. We are capable of managing our finances with a very low risk of error. We have worked with MS Dynamics for almost 15 years and have more than doubled the size of our business in that time with very few issues from the program. We have exponentially increased our revenue and reporting demands and have found SL to be very dependable and stable. The program does have the occasional glitch and those are sometimes outside of the realm of expertise of our IT department. SL support is excellent, but their timeliness is not as urgent as ours.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Well suited: For use in multiple offices around the world. I was able to obtain financial reporting data from 5 foreign offices and then consolidate their data with 3 domestic USA offices to prepare a consolidated financial statement. Less Appropriate: Translating the financial value for consulting services could be a bit challenging because that required human interaction and judgement. It would have been great to be able to set up some software to be able to interpret this and let it run for all future project work revenue projection.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Provides flexibility for complex project based cost accounting
Strong and flexible allocation processer for cost allocations, markups, and pricing
A "Flexible Billing" module under the project controller series that allows for multiple billing formats ranging from fixed price schedule of values, T&M or Cost Plus, and scheduled billing.
Flexible reporting with options using Crystal Reports, SSRS, a Quick Query tool, and ability to tie into MS Office tools such as MS Access and MS Excel
Tight integration with Financials, but also the ability to integrate with modules such as Sales Order, Inventory, and Field Service
Customization abilities ranging from a VBA (visual basic for application) foundation to allow customizing existing forms to the ability to use the SDK (Software Development Kit) to build more complex customizations that integrate with Dynamics SL.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This product handles budgeting by Employee and/or Position very well. It is highly flexible and allows Hyperion administrators the ability to develop a planning application that fits a variety of different business needs.
It is great at calculating benefits using business rules to automate the population of these fringe costs in the overall budget planning process. This greatly reduces user error.
It allows you to seed the operating budget based on changes to key drivers, such as percentage increases, flat dollar increases and more detailed changes using business rules.
Allows visibility into the plans for each unit across the organization, rolled up into an overall budget for the campus.
It handles the creation of budgets with multiple chartfield segments or dimensions, which most other budgeting systems cannot handle well. It can aggregate these very quickly.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Reporting in the Project module is lacking functionality. I understand that most companies have specific needs when it comes to tracking project information but the standard reports are not good.
I would recommend a product like Management Reporter that is for Projects only. Project Reporter should allow users to pull in all Project related data into reports.
Fixing suspended batches. Obviously all of us users have experienced this mess. SL knows what needs to be corrected and there could be some step by step fixes in a separate repair module to do the steps we do in Query Analyzer.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
One pain point for us is the consolidation and translation process. Needing to translate the data over and over again is frustrating and there is no visibility into how many users are running a translation. If multiple users attempt to translate the same data set, say goodbye to your performance but you have no way of knowing! (Unless you want to pull up a task audit which is not a very realistic expectation). It has the been the quickest way for us to bring the system to it's knees. The consolidation process performs in direct correlation to the complexity of the calculation/consolidation rules. So, while the product is extremely flexible, you still have to be careful how you design your rules and calculations to make sure that you do it on the smallest subset of data as possible to avoid large processing times. This makes sense, but requires some significant expertise that most organizations do not have in-house.
The Hyperion Financial Reporting product is ridiculously outdated and clunky to use. The interface for designing reports is not intuitive, and not easy to modify once a report is built. I think there must be a strategic decision to move away from it and go to something more like Oracle BI because I just can't understand why in the world they don't update the reporting product. It also requires a significant level of expertise to be able to use. Not a great solution at all if you want multiple end-users to create reports in something other than Excel. Nobody except the HFM admin (which I used to be) in our company even touches this module.
Another pain point is the amount of IT support that is required to run this thing, and again, specialized knowledge of Hyperion products and how they work is required for IT to adequately support it. This goes for application servers and the Oracle database that the applications are running on.
Unfortunately, Dynamics' lack of ability to smoothly integrate with our CRM system is causing us to look at other solutions. The efficiencies that we gain by using Dynamics for our day to day accounting are lost in the constant headaches of getting sales quotes to import properly into the system for invoicing. Another major issue for us has been budgeting and reporting. We currently do all of our budgeting and board reporting in Excel, which is too time consuming and inefficient, especially when a system as robust as Dynamics should easily be able to handle this relatively simple task.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We're in the middle of the road because we are not sure that other products on the market fit the bill for what we need yet. Hyperion is expensive and burdensome from an administrator and maintenance standpoint, but it still seems to be the best solution for what we need. Show us an equally capable SaaS consolidation product and we'll talk again.
As the UI is modern and user friendly which makes it easy to navigate . The dashboard , workspace and personalized view helps to access the right set of information with ease
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I rate it a 10 because we have removed the fields we don't need so users can really crank the data into the system. The software was designed for the professional services firm in mind but does a tremendous job for construction firms and "blended" companies that are both distribution firms but project centric as well. Perhaps they drop ship inventory to a project where their employees or subs need to work on a project for example.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have had only one unplanned outage for 2 hours in the last 30 months. We shut down for 30 min to 1 hour once a month, but that is for Microsoft OS updates to the servers. Being a 24/7 world wide operation, the reliability is really important. We do get an 8 hour window on the weekend that we can be down for a short period to install Microsoft Dynamics SL updates, but we do not have many of those. On our last version upgrade, we shut the users out at 9:30 am and were fully operational in less than 6 hours. The upgrade was New SQL server, New SL server and 2 new Citrix servers.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Support is only used when needed, so unfortunately ,they get all the odd issues. It's a difficult business, but Microsoft and our firm do a great job of meeting customer needs. We get routine feedback that our support services are very good.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The premium support team provides much needed dedicated customer service which we are after for what we have paid for this service. We are satisfied with the service and support and do not have any instance where there was an issue that requires escalation to get the right support team. Though the incidence of major issues that requires the premium support are less, we prefer to keep this as a safety net.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Just to let it take its course. The implementation for me once I became a part of my former organization was pretty seamless. Just get to know the basics and call the support team to ask questions if you need help on an issue, should they arise. They are ready, willing, and able to help!
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is more robust, and can handle larger, more complex business operations, and have better delineation between corporate management and divisions in a company, but it is not flexible, nor easy to change. It is complex, inflexible, and difficult to incorporate new workflows or business rules to accommodate changes in the business. We have changed over the past decade and while F&O is big and robust, it is not nimble.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Of the comparable mid-range ERP systems, Dynamics SL competes at the lower end based on price, but also above the high-end based on flexibility, data, and reporting. Being able to stay with the same core accounting from a $100 million dollar company to a $3 billion dollar company shows the range of capabilities.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I use Oracle Hyperion Enterprise Performance Mangement because the company I work at requires me to use it in the Financial Planning sector as most of their data is stored in it. I am open minded and ready to use other performance management tools created by Oracle if my work permits.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Oracle Hyperion allows us to automate and consolidate financial data that used to be performed manually in spreadsheets. From that perspective the ROI is huge.
Oracle Hyperion functionality is extensive and allows us to perform most functions for planning, consolidating and reporting on our financial data.
One negative with Oracle Hyperion is that it is complicated to implement and maintain. It takes expertise at all levels (infrastructure and management) to realize the benefits from it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info