Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is used to automate and modernize global financial operations. The application can monitor performance in real time, predict future outcomes, and support data-driven decisions to drive business growth.
$2,520
per year per user
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Score 8.6 out of 10
N/A
Tagetik is a corporate performance management solution that unifies budgeting, financial planning, consolidation and management reporting. Tagetik is offered as SaaS, on a private cloud, or on-premise, and can migrate between deployments as needed.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Editions & Modules
Dynamics 365 Finance
$2520
per year per user
Dynamics 365 Finance Premium
$3600
per year per user
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Features
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
41% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reimbursement management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
3.0
1 Ratings
87% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
8.0
1 Ratings
2% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
44% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Dashboards
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
7.7
1 Ratings
1% above category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Bank reconciliation
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Expense management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Time tracking
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fixed asset management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-currency support
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multi-division support
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Regulations compliance
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Electronic tax filing
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Self-service portal
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Intercompany Accounting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Localizations
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Enterprise Accounting
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
3.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Centralized Rules Framework
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
38% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing module
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
5.0
1 Ratings
40% below category average
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
-
Ratings
Pricing
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
End-to-end order visibility
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
8.2
10 Ratings
7% above category average
Pixel Perfect reports
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Customizable dashboards
00 Ratings
8.58 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
7.2
24 Ratings
12% below category average
Drill-down analysis
00 Ratings
6.623 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
00 Ratings
7.123 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
00 Ratings
7.17 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
00 Ratings
8.116 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of Product A and Product B
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance
-
Ratings
Wolters Kluwer CCH® Tagetik
9.1
15 Ratings
10% above category average
Publish to Web
00 Ratings
9.610 Ratings
Publish to PDF
00 Ratings
9.413 Ratings
Report Versioning
00 Ratings
7.712 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.611 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of Product A and Product B
I think Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is well suited to an established company that is relatively inflexible and large. It contains very large divisions or even separate entities that all feed into the same database / g/l structure. The optimal company will not have many changes over time, and will be configured once and any new divisions or companies will be forced to fit into the corporate dictated structure and rules.
Scenarios where CCH Tagetik is suitable is when a company have large amounts of data and want to transform, consolidate, store and produce reporting in different year, period etc with complex calculations and allocation. Tagetik is the tool for you in this case and it's very flexible in terms of creating your own business rule, calculation and reporting options with a user friendly interface. I have not thought about scenarios where it is not appropriate to use tagetik yet as the tool covers small and large business financial needs
Processes are clearly described in CCH Tagetik ; users can easily find where they are and which action they have to make
Interaction with Excel is really fluid ; the Excel add-in is easy to deploy and to updgrade, in the hand of users. It is reliable provided the internet connection is fast.
Managing hierachies is obvious in CCH Tagetik. Hierarchies are fundamental for a good reporting ; CCH Tagetik has obviously a deep experience of this feature.
SaaS : our experience with CCH Tagetik is of only 1 year, but it technically performs well, the system is reponsive, no shut-down, and updates (every quarter) do not disturb production.
AIH seems to be able to manage very large quantity of data, and to provide advanced analysis functionalities. We did not have time to explore them.
Because in my oppinion Wolters Kluwer CCH Tagetik is one of the most usable tools for consolidation, planning (controlling) and reporting. Its usability is quite easy and innovative. I like the data entry method for the customers with its workflow and tasks, quite easy way to implement a co pilot. And i like the reporting tool, with a lot of customization opportunities.
Surprisingly, this platform is a powerhouse ERP system. However, given time, when more and more organization is able to identify how powerful this tool can be, CCH Tagetik is able to stand as a competitive advantage to many of the Financial industry of today. Although, it needs time to understand the logic behind how CCH Tagetik is formed and setup, once it is known to the user, it is an easy day to day operations with minimal maintenance.
CCH Tagetik has alwyas been there in case we need help. In almost 20 years of commercial relationship, I have no evidence of times in which they were not available to answer a question or to solve an issue linked to their products, timely and efficiently.
As you can see, speed depends on the applications but also on the hardware that runs them. As far as CCH Tagetik improved, we saw the benefit of a cloud-based solution which could solve many speed performance issues.
I got very quick respons. After very little mail iterations, they decided to have online meeting to look together with me to the issue. They tried to solve it during the meeting. I had the impression that the customer care person really knew the system and was able to ask help from other colleagues when needed
At the official deployment of the original product Controlling and Accounting teams went to Lucca and were walked through the product, Excel usage, Design, ETL run
several times since the deployment of the product in 2013 we got on-line training on new functions or on very specific questions/issues (e.g. ETL customisation), followed by the usage of the Learning Hub since 2025
we did it in a coaching model. This allowed us to have 2 key advantages: we got to know the system very well and managed to save on the implementation cost. This worked well, was maybe a bit slower since we had to do this in our spare time. Nevertheless I strongly recommand
Microsoft Dynamics 365 Finance is more robust, and can handle larger, more complex business operations, and have better delineation between corporate management and divisions in a company, but it is not flexible, nor easy to change. It is complex, inflexible, and difficult to incorporate new workflows or business rules to accommodate changes in the business. We have changed over the past decade and while F&O is big and robust, it is not nimble.
I found the Excel piece of IBM Cognos TM1 to be easier to use than CCH Tagetik. It was much easier to customize the data being pulled and the feel of the reports because of that. Other than that, CCH Tagetik has been more user friendly than IBM Cognos TM1. Navigating within the application is much easier. IBM Cognos TM1 had a lot of issues with certain modules that could not be open concurrently; this would often lead to phantom data being entered in the system. I have not had these issues with CCH Tagetik.
A good and performing scalability both on a geographical and a legal entity scale. The link with MS Office suite allows an easy deployment of the application, especially for contributors.
Gave us a tool that can absolutely grow with us to help multi phase implementations.
A significant time savings in terms of the amount of time we used to spend running reports vs. the time we spend now. Unbelievable improvement.
Gives us the option to use CCH Tagetik to solve business problems that perhaps we didn't have when we implemented CCH Tagetik. It gives us options without the possibility of implementing a whole other software package.