Microsoft Dynamics 365 for Finance and Operations (or Dynamics AX) was an ERP product in the Dynamics family. It has been split into separate Dynamics 365 products and is no longer available.
N/A
sticky.io
Score9 out of 10
N/A
sticky.io (formerly LimeLight), headquartered in San Francisco, offers their subscription business management platform supporting ecommerce transactions and recurring billing along with customer management, payment gateway, and fraud protected transacting.
N/A
Pricing
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
sticky.io
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
sticky.io
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
sticky.io
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
8 Ratings
16% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Pay calculation
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Direct deposit files
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.0
13 Ratings
7% below category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
API for custom integration
5.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plug-ins
8.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
6.0
14 Ratings
33% below category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
5.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.3
14 Ratings
10% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Dashboards
9.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standard reports
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom reports
9.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
General Ledger and Configurable Accounting
Comparison of General Ledger and Configurable Accounting features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.2
15 Ratings
6% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Accounts payable
7.015 Ratings
00 Ratings
Accounts receivable
7.014 Ratings
00 Ratings
Global Financial Support
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Primary and Secondary Ledgers
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Journals and Reconciliations
7.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configurable Accounting
9.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Standardized Processes
8.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Management
Comparison of Inventory Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
13 Ratings
9% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Inventory tracking
8.013 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automatic reordering
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Location management
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Management
Comparison of Order Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.6
13 Ratings
4% below category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Pricing
8.012 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order entry
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Credit card processing
3.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost of goods sold
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Order Orchestration
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subledger and Financial Process
Comparison of Subledger and Financial Process features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
10 Ratings
14% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Billing Management
8.99 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cash and Asset Management
8.010 Ratings
00 Ratings
Travel & Expense Management
8.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Budgetary Control & Encumbrance Accounting
8.97 Ratings
00 Ratings
Period Close
8.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Financial Management
Comparison of Project Financial Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.9
7 Ratings
16% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Budgeting and Forecasting
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Costing
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Cost Capture
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Capital Project Management
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Contract Compliance
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Revenue Recognition
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Execution Management
Comparison of Project Execution Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
5 Ratings
22% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Project Planning and Scheduling
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Insight for Project Managers
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Mobile Functionality
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Definable Resource Pools
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Grants Management
Comparison of Grants Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
4 Ratings
15% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Award Lifecycle Management
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Procurement
Comparison of Procurement features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.7
7 Ratings
20% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Bids Analyzed and Compared
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Authoring
9.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract Repository
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Requisitions-to-Purchase Orders Integrated
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supplier Management
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Risk Management
Comparison of Risk Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.8
2 Ratings
26% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Risk Repository
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Management
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Control Efficiency Assessments
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Issue Detection
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Remediation and Certification
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Logistics
Comparison of Logistics features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
8.5
6 Ratings
19% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Transportation Planning and Optimization
8.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Transportation Execution Management
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Trade and Customs Management
8.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Fulfillment Management
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Warehouse Workforce Management
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing
Comparison of Manufacturing features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
7.7
6 Ratings
3% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Production Process Design
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Production Management
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Configuration Management
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Work Execution
8.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manufacturing Costs
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Supply Chain
Comparison of Supply Chain features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
Feature
Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued)
9.2
6 Ratings
22% above category average
sticky.io
-
Ratings
Forecasting
9.95 Ratings
00 Ratings
Inventory Planning
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Monitoring
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Product Lifecycle Management
Comparison of Product Lifecycle Management features of Microsoft Dynamics AX (discontinued) and sticky.io
It integrates fully with the other Microsoft software we use daily, and this coordination speeds up our work and gives us the agility to run easily. For example, in a purchase inquiry, the customer, after submitting a request, identifies the teams that should work on the project, and if they need further review by other people, they are added to the process, and everything is managed seamlessly rather than the sales process. Get the result as fast as possible.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Lime Light CRM was built specifically for online marketers, helping them to manage their online sales, contacts, orders, and payments. The software combines a number of features and 3rd party provider integrations to offer the ability to store customer data, build online eCommerce campaigns, create sales reports, and automate order management activities, as well as track, store and report on affiliate data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics AX's scalability to meet our regional office needs provide flexibility to the team's requirements.
Combined with Citrix Xenapp, the application offers seamless access for users on high latency unreliable network connection to the application.
Application maintenance and updates are easy which makes it possible for us to manage remotely considering the servers are located in a remote Asia site.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
For an easy to learn CRM this would be it, you can fully train someone on Limelight in less than a few days
It allows for various wildcard searches to be performed in different fields, which speeds up productivity and requires less request to repeat information to locate accounts while speaking to clients.
The CRM holds multiple user accounts and products, and shows failed attempts to purchase and gives reason codes for why the purchase was not successful. Allows for different views to review client accounts.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
MRP can be slow to adapt to changes in actual production or supply chain transactions.
Setting up number sequences seems a trivial matter, but these numbers ID transactions once they are in the ledger and are key--easy to miss this point in the implementation process.
Bank rec being easily automated and able to quickly plug into a bank back end to get data is not the best.
Payment processing can be 'clunky' based on checks, ACH, Wires...as some of these items are not triggered out of the box in AX, bur are easily added --talking ACH and Wires specifically.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Note taking can be a hassle, when writing notes there is not a separate tab, or dedicated area which allows for multiple users to leave notes for future users, or administrators to reference regarding actions made to the account, users must search per line item to view notes, or go to a different view to see all notes which is still per line item as you toggle through the notes
If the client has been with the product for several months or years it is a lot of notes you have to reference through which hurts productivity and creates longer calls. A huge con is when you are canceling out a user account, or if you are changing a recurring date if the user clicks the back button after the tasks completes refreshing the webpage to reflect the new dates, the new changes will go undone and revert back to the original data as if no changes were made resulting in user error. The client continues to be billed and discounts continue to apply.
The CRM needs to fix this to prompt "Do you want to undo discount/date change/cancellation?" if the back button is clicked to eliminate user error based on the software limitations. Features which can be customized to automatically perform after actions are done on an account need a function to allow for agents to resend emails if the user did not get them. If automatic emails go to users canceling and they did not get it you have to restart the product then cancel it again to have another automatic email sent to the client/customer or manually send an email. For refunds, if the automatic email did not go out you have to manually send out the email which is time-consuming allocating to another agent or for the current agent. There is a need for an upgrade which allows that after an automatic email has been sent a button will appear which says "resend cancellation" "resend refund" this should also be true if the user inputted the email wrong and it was only noticed by agent after the automatic email was sent and the agent needs to update the email for the client/customer to be able to receive the email at the correct address.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Microsoft Dynamics continues to evolve by bringing more functionality to the customer. Also there are several independent software providers that offer a wide range of solutions for vertical markets.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Overall the product does what we need it to do in order for us to function as a company. While there are some concerns over ongoing costs, the belief is, once we have it fully acclimated to our business the cost should settle into alignment with our original expectations. The new features that are consistently being added do add value to the product as they are usually customer request directed.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
Some integration and high volume ramping challenges, particularly with BizTalk and SQL Server, but getting sorted out. Outages over time appeared to be more dependent on integration complexity than AX MES.
We use a 3rd-party Microsoft Partner for the system. They are responsive and very knowledgeable. While costs have been mentioned several times in this review they are very aware of costs and have developers who are more economical they use to help offset the level of work required to meet our changes and fix our issues.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info
It took a lot of work, but Microsoft ultimately did a good job with in-person training, including being onsite in multiple global locations for extended periods.
Our solution deviated from a number of key out-of-the-box standards that were included in Online training. We just used that for introduction to the general functionality.
Some rough spots, but ultimately worked out. The contract didn't appear to be structured to support the level of overlapping facility deployments required to meet timeline commitments. Merging cultures on the program was also challenging. Overall, not an easy implementation by any stretch. Everyone did the best they could.
I was not part of the decision making process to select Microsoft Dynamics AX, however, I do know that an exhaustive search was done and many options were considered alongside Microsoft Dynamics AX and I feel that the right decision was made in choosing this solution.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info