Microsoft SharePoint vs. NAVEX One

SharePoint Document Management excels as a central repository for storing, organising, and retrieving documents. It supports version control, metadata tagging, secure access, and integration with tools like Power Automate. At our organisation, it's used for managing contracts, policies, and supplier documents. SharePoint Workflow Automation integrates with Power Automate to streamline approvals, gather feedback, and automate recurring tasks. This reduces reliance on email chains and manual trackers.

Incentivized

We have used PolicyTech for over 13 years. We have found it to be a robust solution, that has great technical support, and that continues to evolve as technology changes. If a business is looking for a solution to support best practices in policy and procedure development and distribution, there is no better solution than PolicyTech. We currently use PolicyTech’s SAS service. This solution would not be as effective for business environments that do not have computers for their employees to access on a daily basis.

Incentivized

• We track employees' performance sheets, which are accessible to the employee, his manager, and HR, and this helps with transparency.
• We maintain technical process documents and SOPs, which help us quickly provide relevant documents during audits.
• We maintain incident documents change request forms in SharePoint, which helps us in tracking the changes.

Incentivized

• One of the main features and functions that I like about NAVEX One is the proper management and number of solutions that it provides to my documents to achieve a better corporate response.
• Thanks to the help of NAVEX One I can have a better control of the risks in my work area, this is thanks to the versatility that this software has to address and manage all aspects of my organization.

Incentivized

• It still needs to jam some services together like Planner and lists so that teams can interact from a single place[.]
• Sites need to be more intuitive and rather building from scratch should come up with some suggestion[.]
• The tool tips for new users are not adequate[.]

Incentivized

• Safely monitizing data.
• Move from data and insights to plans, decisions, and execution within a single platform to realize the business impact.
• Digitize the internal Management system for risk and compliance framework.

Incentivized

We have too much invested at this point to do anything different and there are too many reasons as a company our size to keep it. We are heavily licensed out for Microsoft and have 12 years of SharePoint development baked into who we are. Extracting that as a tool at this point would be dumb and devastating. There are no like-kind competitors to it at an enterprise level that scale and integrate as well.

Incentivized

No usability issues reported. Individual teams also have allocated areas which replace legacy shared drives on local LANs. Access to Sharepoint resources is fully integrated with corporate Active Directory with additional two-factor authentication required for administrative users. Users have access to Microsoft Services Hub which allows you to create, manage, and track support requests while staying current on Microsoft technologies with access to select self-paced learning paths

Incentivized

Support for SharePoint is quite good. Microsoft provides good support. Microsoft offers

• Quick turnaround time for issues
• A range of support services
• Access to a network of resources
• Escalation of issues
• Ongoing development and commitment to produce enhancement

The majority of support is required for initial installation. Once complete and the system is operating we have had very few support issues.

Incentivized

Only the administrator can talk to them.

Incentivized

The face to face training I received was on SharePoint Administration. It was rushed as there was a lot of information to cover and the application of the labs weren't that great either. I like to be able to relate what I am learning to what I am currently doing.

I like to learn at my own pace and online training allows for that. Additionally, you can skip through pieces of content that you already know or are already comfortable with. Microsoft actually offers great videos on their website for basic fundamental SharePoint Training. I have used these training videos in some of my own training sessions with end users.

Planning to the last detail would be advised. SharePoint is a very large application that takes a lot of finesse to get operational

SharePoint feels more secure than Google Drive and maintains Excel sheets fully-- something Google constantly messes up. Confluence isn't great for collaboration, though the design elements are cute. SharePoint is a workhorse that always gets the job done, exactly as it needs. As far as cloud-based databases go, if you need to maintain formatting, SharePoint is the way to go.

Navex is best intuitive and satisfied all the security & compliance requirement. ServiceNow GRC is complex & not easy to deployable.. also need that cost effective solution. Even it was tough to customize initially but later after doing fine-tuning with policies & process we got best insights & inputs from solution .

Incentivized

• We've recently implemented Microsoft SharePoint access via iPads for our Template teams out on job sites. They can easily upload CAD / Laser files into Microsoft SharePoint for our production team to review in real time. Serious ROI when we don't have to wait for our Template team to get back to the shop!
• We have multiple physical locations. Microsoft SharePoint allows users at each location to collaborate by working on documents simultaneously. Allowing us to solve multi-site problems & strategize on multi-site initiatives much faster!
• We can also share key information with external partners. As long as they have a registered MS account (not necessarily an O365 account) we can share our information with them in a variety of ways. This allows consistent & concise communication with our partners.

Incentivized

• We've been able to decrease the staff time and travel expense to review documents via committee
• The staff has access to the most up to date version of policies, procedures, and forms. It has decreased the utilization of dated forms.
• We've been able to expedite the policy, procedure and document review for onsite accreditation visits and the ability to provide online access to regulatory bodies/oversight agencies has simplified audit/review/corrective action immensely.

Incentivized