Microsoft System Center vs. Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure vs. PATCH MANAGER

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Microsoft System Center
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Microsoft System Center Suite is a family of IT management software for network monitoring, updating and patching, endpoint protection with anti-malware, data protection and backup, ITIL- structured IT service management, remote administration and more. It is available in two editions: standard and datacenter. Datacenter provides unlimited virtualization for high density private clouds, while standard is for lightly or non-virtualized private cloud workloads.
$1,323
per month
Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Score 8.9 out of 10
N/A
Nutanix in San Jose, California offers their software-defined Enterprise Cloud as a hyper-converged infrastructure solution. The Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure solution combines the Nutanix Acropolis virtualization solution, Nutanix AHV hypervisor (though Acropolis works with other hypervisors), Prism cluster manager, Nutanix Calm and Nutanix Flow server management, and is available on the Nutanix NX series of server hardware appliances, as well as third-party OEM appliances.N/A
PATCH MANAGER
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
Dutch company Patchmanager presents a wiring and connectivity oriented DCIM solution, PATCH MANAGER, providing management of copper, fber, WAN, LAN and power infrastructure.N/A
Pricing
Microsoft System CenterNutanix Cloud InfrastructurePATCH MANAGER
Editions & Modules
Standard Edition
$1323
Datacenter Edition
$3607
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Microsoft System CenterNutanix Cloud InfrastructurePATCH MANAGER
Free Trial
NoNoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Microsoft System CenterNutanix Cloud InfrastructurePATCH MANAGER
Considered Multiple Products
Microsoft System Center

No answer on this topic

Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
Chose Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure
I personally prefer the Nutanix approach based on their hardware, software, and firmware integration. The technical options and features make it a great product to be working with.
PATCH MANAGER

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Microsoft System CenterNutanix Cloud InfrastructurePATCH MANAGER
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

StarWind HCA
StarWind HCA
Score 9.2 out of 10

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

StarWind HCA
StarWind HCA
Score 9.2 out of 10
Microsoft System Center
Microsoft System Center
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises

No answers on this topic

VMware vSAN
VMware vSAN
Score 8.6 out of 10
Microsoft System Center
Microsoft System Center
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Microsoft System CenterNutanix Cloud InfrastructurePATCH MANAGER
Likelihood to Recommend
9.0
(21 ratings)
8.9
(77 ratings)
7.0
(1 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
8.2
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(2 ratings)
9.2
(9 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
8.5
(51 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(1 ratings)
9.7
(54 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
-
(0 ratings)
8.6
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
-
(0 ratings)
5.2
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Microsoft System CenterNutanix Cloud InfrastructurePATCH MANAGER
Likelihood to Recommend
Microsoft
For companies with more than 10 Windows devices and needing to standardize the OS, AV, access, share resources, and install software. SCCM is the way to go. This software is unnecessary if the business is all remote users and not in an office-type setting. There are cloud offerings or none to accomplish what a business needs.
Read full review
Nutanix
For an organization that requires top-notch performance HCI, Nutanix is the best. You may start with 3 nodes and expand the cluster as required. The management through Nutanix Prism Central and Element was so easy that even a Junior Engineer was able to handle it. The Nutanix platform is not suitable for organizations with a small budget and fewer requirements for high-performance infrastructure, as the Nutanix solution itself is suited for enterprises.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Pros
Microsoft
  • Allows the grouping of devices by user.
  • Allows controlling updates being deployed to user devices.
  • Allows for the repurposing of machines by being able to load new or updated software on machines that already are in the system.
  • Allows us the ability to wipe a machine clean and restore it back to the configuration that was assigned the machine.
Read full review
Nutanix
  • One-click upgrades; whether it's hypervisor, firmware, disk or other updates. This feature has drastically decreased complexity and administration time.
  • Data Locality. Not all hyperconverged technology is created equal. When I first purchased Nutanix they were the only vendor (and as far as I know, still are) that made sure the storage a VM used was on the same host that VM was running on. Given a normal operating state, the [storage] network is literally only used for replication data.
  • They got rid of traditional RAID. Nutanix uses software to determine where a VM's storage should be written and replicated to. This dramatically decreases I/O when changing the number of nodes in a cluster, be it on purpose or during a failure scenario. Ex. adding a new node: If one uses RAID arrays then enough space has to be set aside to create a new array that includes the new node, then all the information has to be copied over, and the old array destroyed. RAID arrays do not grow and shrink gracefully so Nutanix has designed a better solution.
  • The Nutanix management interface was built on HTML5. No more flash headaches!
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
  • Patching cluster of servers.
  • Sorting what is already installed vs. what is needed.
  • Easy OU management.
Read full review
Cons
Microsoft
  • Needs web based storefront for requesting new software
  • Needs ability to manage the packaging work flow better
  • Sometimes is slow to download and there is no indication the entire catalog is being loaded, resulting in confused users not being able to find common software in the available list.
Read full review
Nutanix
  • Can be priced high at times.
  • The one downside I have working with Nutanix is the sales team. They seem to try to add in extra goodies to sales quotes or push for extras that you don't really need and you have to tell them to take them out. Don't be afraid to push back on them.
  • Need to analyze sizing with sales team to ensure right sizing.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
  • The actual patching process.
  • The GUI can be a little clunky.
  • When selecting a server or cluster you select the patches you want to install. After highlighting you have to left click the server or cluster in question to make sure there is a transparent yellow dotted line surrounding it (which can be difficult to see).
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Nutanix
AOS definitely make our dev/test virtual environment management much easier than before. And the consolidation the test/dev environment from Azure and Cisco UCS, we have less need to transfer large amount of data between different hardware platforms which was very big challenge. To expand the capacity is very easy to archive as well.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Usability
Microsoft
It is not user-friendly for the most part. With IT infrastructure, sometimes it cannot handle excess requests. Every few months, you will need an upgrade in terms of server resources to keep up with incoming alerts and requests. This does not happen all of the time, but it does happen when there are too many requests.
Read full review
Nutanix
It's not out of the box easy, but once you get the fundamentals the steep learning curve flattens out and the processes to get things done and how it works becomes very apparent. It's wrapping the slight change in workflow from prior VM management methods took time to unbox and apply the Nutanix Cloud Infrastructure way
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Nutanix
So far no issue on availability during no issue on network or power outage
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Performance
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Nutanix
The performance is nothing short of amazing. This is an HCI solution, and as any all-flash HCI solution is amazingly fast, Nutanix AOS fills local IO requests until its local IO is saturated before reaching out over the network. This lowers latency substantially compared to vSAN.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Microsoft
If I had to dislike something about the system it would be how much it changes once you upgrade. This could be more of a problem of mine since I get used to one way and don't like it when it changes so much. I am enjoying the newest update, but it is a mess when you are actually going through the upgrades.
Read full review
Nutanix
Our implementation team were great and worked with us and got the program up and running very easily. Every time we called post implementation we immediately talked to an Engineer, which is so unusual in dealing with companies. Everything they have promised they have full filled. I think their support is top notch.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Nutanix
We requested more training than typical which was very in depth
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Online Training
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Nutanix
A lot of online training courses, most of them are free.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Nutanix
IPv6 is needed for link local discovery. We do not have IPv6 configured on our network so the easiest way to get our nodes configured and discovered by foundation was to configure the IPv4 addressing within the node prior to trying to discover with foundation.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Microsoft
We previously used a mix of FOG and Clonezilla to image machines. The biggest issues with these products is that changing one piece of the image required you to rebuild the entire image itself. These pieces of software also did not allow you to manage applications and Windows Updates, causing IT to have to constantly touch machines after they were imaged and update or manage them with a much more hands on approach.
Read full review
Nutanix
Nutanix integrates very well with Rubrik for backup and protection of the environment. Nutanix gave us simplicity and scalability compared to VMware and allowed us to extend our infrastructure into the cloud using EC2. One unified management pane for all our workloads, unlike VMWare.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Scalability
Microsoft
No answers on this topic
Nutanix
We have scaled our products over the years and continue to do so very easily.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Microsoft
  • We have been able to automate our patch management, firmware and other security concerns.
  • We have a standardized "image" ensuring our setup is consistent across the enterprise. This alone has saved us in time to support and time to understand how to use our desktops.
Read full review
Nutanix
  • We find that return on investment is probably a better metric in most cases.
  • ROI analysis is more than an exercise. Companies must outline what their future looks like, even if it’s vastly different from what they’re used to and comfortable with.
  • As good as your financial analysis might be, displacing status quo infrastructure has a lot of emotions tied to it.
Read full review
Patchmanager BV
  • It is a good tool. It allows us to schedule out our patches and verify any issues we may have had.
  • It gets the job done but there are several improvements that be made to the interface.
Read full review
ScreenShots