| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
 MongoDB | Score8.8 out of 10 | N/A | MongoDB is an open source document-oriented database system. It is part of the NoSQL family of database systems. Instead of storing data in tables as is done in a "classical" relational database, MongoDB stores structured data as JSON-like documents with dynamic schemas (MongoDB calls the format BSON), making the integration of data in certain types of applications easier and faster. | $0.10 million reads |
| MongoDB | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| ||||||||||
| Offerings |
| ||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||
| Additional Details | Fully managed, global cloud database on AWS, Azure, and GCP | ||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | |||||||||||
| MongoDB | |
|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | Chose MongoDB Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB We wanted to try something which is not a relation DB and has more of distributed architecture. MongoDB turned out to be a great choice. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB None Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose MongoDB Incentivized Invited by TrustRadius (TR) on Vendor's Behalf A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. TR verified that a representative sample of customers was invited. More Info Chose MongoDB MongoDB is more of a general purpose nosql database, while Elasticsearch is a search engine oriented nosql solution. Percona Server for MongoDB is a more suitable solution for the enterprise field. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB MongoDB is the most reliable and fastest for storing document-based data. It has a place among the most popular DB's these days. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB Snowflake and Redshift are much more mature and have been around longer. MongoDB is definitely much less expensive and if you are in a startup, this is an almost for-sure option. Redshift can be slow and Mongo is much faster. However, losing the relational database aspect could … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB I just felt MongoDB was easier to use and more cost-effective. Aggregation pipelines are great. Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB It's very fast and easiest to use. Many companies are using this nowadays. It's helped to complete many software products very quickly so the year income has increased compared with last years. Many programmers are now leaning this tool as back end developers so that we changed … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB Your default choice should not be MongoDB in my opinion. Most user-facing systems are relational by nature so a well known and reliable SQL database would be easier to maintain and simpler to develop long term. If you highly value speed of development go with Firebase. If you … Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info Chose MongoDB Incentivized Independently Invited by TrustRadius A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info |
| Key User Insights | |
| Would buy again | |
100% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | |
100% Delivers good value for the price 12 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | |
100% Happy with the feature set 12 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | |
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | |
100% Implementation went as expected 12 Answers | |
| MongoDB | |||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NoSQL Databases |
|
| MongoDB | |
|---|---|
| Small Businesses |  IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Cloudant Score7.4 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives |
| MongoDB | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 |
| Usability | 10.0 |
| Availability | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 9.6 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.4 |
| MongoDB | |
|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
| Pros |
|
| Cons |
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
| Usability |
|
| Support Rating |
|
| Implementation Rating |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
| ScreenShots | MongoDB Screenshots      |
