What users are saying about
12 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
Top Rated
70 Ratings
12 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.4 out of 100

Teamcenter

<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring#question3' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>Customer Verified: Read more.</a>
Top Rated
70 Ratings
<a href='https://www.trustradius.com/static/about-trustradius-scoring' target='_blank' rel='nofollow noopener'>trScore algorithm: Learn more.</a>
Score 8.1 out of 100

Attribute Ratings

  • Teamcenter is rated higher in 1 area: Likelihood to Recommend

Likelihood to Recommend

7.0

LabVIEW

70%
5 Ratings
8.1

Teamcenter

81%
28 Ratings

Likelihood to Renew

LabVIEW

N/A
0 Ratings
9.0

Teamcenter

90%
8 Ratings

Usability

LabVIEW

N/A
0 Ratings
6.0

Teamcenter

60%
3 Ratings

Support Rating

LabVIEW

N/A
0 Ratings
8.2

Teamcenter

82%
21 Ratings

Implementation Rating

LabVIEW

N/A
0 Ratings
8.0

Teamcenter

80%
2 Ratings

Product Scalability

LabVIEW

N/A
0 Ratings
9.0

Teamcenter

90%
1 Rating

Likelihood to Recommend

NI (National Instruments)

LabView is a great tool to connect your sensors to your data aquisition hardware. It makes it really easy to set-up a data acquisition routine that meets your individual requirements. I, as an engine researcher, find it very well suited for engine experimentation. For any other programming needs, i.e. not data acquisition, I would not recommend using LabView because of its graphical programming architecture. The architecture makes it a great tool for Data Aquisition but puts at a disadvantage when it comes to other computational tasks, e.g. making a thermodynamic engine model. For those applications having text-based programming is better suited
Read full review

Siemens AG

Clients can increment productivity by distinguishing special open doors to re-use fabricating resources. This will help undertakings' general usefulness across the whole organization. Ensuring that your endeavor is using their designing resources is vital to effectively working their assembling cycle. Two things ring a bell; the greater part of the default screens are "swarmed," and it requires an investment to comprehend the blunder messages once you commit an error utilizing the capability.
Read full review

Pros

NI (National Instruments)

  • Automation.
  • I/O.
  • Data Processing.
Read full review

Siemens AG

  • Teamcenter reduces the manual effort and cost of managing and tracking any of our Products Lifecycle Management easily.
  • Fast time-to-value and low cost of ownership through the flexible deployment options (On-premises, cloud, and pre-configured).
  • Enables us to create easy specifications, analysis reports, 2D/3D illustrations, test results, and technical publications aligned with product changes.
  • The support team is wonderful, proactive 24/7 and very user-friendly.
Read full review

Cons

NI (National Instruments)

  • Sometimes backwards compatibility issues arise.
  • Error messages can be confusing.
  • Although it is a graphical programming interface, it has a pretty steep learning curve at first.
Read full review

Siemens AG

  • roles definition and authorization can be made more user friendly
  • process schedule definition requires more of IT skills than an actual use case, there can be dashboards to define such processes and it can be automated effectively
  • organization of workflows can be handled better and there should be automated reminders for tasks within the workflow
  • the user interface is pretty outdated, still menu based and has lot of scope for improvement
Read full review

Pricing Details

LabVIEW

Starting Price

$407 per year

Editions & Modules

LabVIEW editions and modules pricing
EditionModules
LabView Base4071
LabView Full3,2062
LabView Professional5,3443

Offerings

Free Trial
Free/Freemium Version
Premium Consulting/Integration Services

Entry-level set up fee?

No setup fee

Additional Details

Teamcenter

Starting Price

Editions & Modules

Teamcenter editions and modules pricing
EditionModules

Footnotes

    Offerings

    Free Trial
    Free/Freemium Version
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services

    Entry-level set up fee?

    No setup fee

    Additional Details

    Likelihood to Renew

    NI (National Instruments)

    No answers on this topic

    Siemens AG

    Because of our current customer needs, we will most likely maintain use of Siemens PLM products for some time. Aside from the initial software cost, we pay for yearly maintenance. Maintaining our yearly maintenance licensing with Siemens, we receive access to all of the latest software releases, as well as premier technical support
    Read full review

    Usability

    NI (National Instruments)

    No answers on this topic

    Siemens AG

    As previously mentioned, due to the intense amount of features and modules present in the software, the usability of the software suffers greatly. Many of the features are not used in our context, and many of the modules are not purchased, but the options are still present on the interface leading to a lot of clutter, much of which is never used. The interfaces suffer from a lack of design and tend to feel like a conglomerate of Windows 98 elements.
    Read full review

    Support Rating

    NI (National Instruments)

    No answers on this topic

    Siemens AG

    In the time that we have used Teamcenter we have received a good response from the support team, they have great customer service, we have solved the problems that have arisen very quickly, and they are attentive and answer us if we have any questions.
    Read full review

    Alternatives Considered

    NI (National Instruments)

    We chose LabVIEW over MATLAB due to the integration with hardware and the graphical programming interface. Also, the ability to use LabVIEW with FPGAs and real-time processors without having to make large changes to the code base or swapping to a separate programming environment was a big benefit since we don't know what hardware will be suitable for each customer application.
    Read full review

    Siemens AG

    I felt that Teamcenter fulfilled the needs of most business better than the Windchill PTC and SAP PLM. When comparing the quality of ongoing product support, Teamcenter was the preferred choice in my opinion. For feature updates and roadmaps, I prefer Teamcenter over SAP PLM. Compared to Windchill and SAP PLM, Teamcenter is more easy to use. It's easier to setup and start Designing. Also, when it comes to product performance, Teamcenter usage shows a much exponential growth.
    Read full review

    Scalability

    NI (National Instruments)

    No answers on this topic

    Siemens AG

    It's a very robust and mature tool. The only thing that would make it better is the have a version embrace the cloud, which I'm sure is underway, but it's complicated, so it will take more time. But when it's done, look out. It will be near-perfect!
    Read full review

    Return on Investment

    NI (National Instruments)

    • Allows us to spend more time on analysis and less time on coding
    Read full review

    Siemens AG

    • There is a somewhat moderate but safe ROI, the use of this software helps save a lot of time for our engineers and designers when visualizing and managing CAD; which has allowed us to meet our clients and deliver our work on time.
    Read full review

    Screenshots

    Add comparison