NEOGOV Onboard vs. Zimyo

NEOGOV Onboard is well-suited for companies who hire many candidates; especially if the Onboarding Team (HR in our case) is working remotely. NEOGOV Onboard would be less-well-suited for organizations who do not hire a lot of candidates and who are able to meet with a new hire in-person.

Incentivized

Best suited for automated HR process and effective employee engagement. Not so appropriate for companies who have very specific processes and require customizations that are out of the ordinary.

Incentivized

• Good value.
• Built based on U.S. public sector organizations and needs.
• Paper reduction and improved efficiencies.

Incentivized

• Recruitment with the ATS add on.
• Employee Engagement.
• Attendance Management.

Incentivized

• A better connection between NEOGOV Onboard and Insight/OHC would be useful
• The ability to utilize candidate text messaging and/or send notices via Onboard (rather than OHC/Insight) could help save time
• It would be helpful to allow candidates to communicate with internal staff via the Mentors Widget in the Preboarding Portal, not just the Onboarding Portal

Incentivized

• Zimyo has room for integrations.
• Layout is simple but can be better in terms of design, looks a bit like too simple.
• LinkedIn Integration and offer letter management.

Incentivized

NEOGOV has more limitations than bigger HCM solutions and is limited to public sector/government operations.

Incentivized

Zimyo's pricing is better than the rest of the HRMS tools available in the market and very simple to use and deploy within the organization.

Incentivized

• Candidates are generally pleased with their Preboarding/Onboarding experience

Incentivized

• Zimyo has resulted in very good ROI.
• Automation of Human Resources Processes.
• We were able to recover the invested amount in 6 months only.

Incentivized