Netskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.
N/A
SugarSync
Score3.6 out of 10
N/A
SugarSync is a cloud storage and backup solution designed for small businesses.
$7.50
per month
Pricing
Netskope Private Access
SugarSync
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
100 GB
$7.49
per month
250 GB
$9.99
per month
500 GB
$18.95
per month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Netskope Private Access
SugarSync
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Netskope Private Access
SugarSync
Identity Management
Comparison of Identity Management features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
Feature
Netskope Private Access
10.0
2 Ratings
13% above category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Multi-Factor Authentication
10.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Endpoint Security
Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
Feature
Netskope Private Access
7.5
3 Ratings
18% below category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)
7.53 Ratings
00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence
Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
Feature
Netskope Private Access
6.8
4 Ratings
16% below category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Network Analytics
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Threat Recognition
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Vulnerability Classification
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated Alerts and Reporting
7.64 Ratings
00 Ratings
Threat Analysis
6.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Threat Intelligence Reporting
6.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Automated Threat Identification
6.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Zero Trust Security
Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
Feature
Netskope Private Access
7.8
4 Ratings
10% below category average
SugarSync
-
Ratings
Continuous Verification
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Secure Web Gateways
8.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network Flow Control
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network Traffic Analysis
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Segmentation Leveraging
6.74 Ratings
00 Ratings
Admin Access Control
9.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network Data Encryption
7.34 Ratings
00 Ratings
Network Topology Mapping
7.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
Feature
Netskope Private Access
-
Ratings
SugarSync
9.4
8 Ratings
11% above category average
Versioning
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Video files
00 Ratings
9.05 Ratings
Audio files
00 Ratings
10.05 Ratings
Document collaboration
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
Access control
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
File search
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Device sync
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Cloud Storage Security & Administration
Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
Feature
Netskope Private Access
-
Ratings
SugarSync
9.7
8 Ratings
11% above category average
User and role management
00 Ratings
10.07 Ratings
File organization
00 Ratings
9.08 Ratings
Device management
00 Ratings
10.08 Ratings
Cloud Storage Platform
Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When doing daily jobs, if you’re sharing large files, I think Dropbox works a lot better but if you have a system where you’re working within that system and you want to be able to work with that system and have certain folders that you have access to all the time then SugarSync might be just the ticket.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Can only think of one thing. I have helped others to get going with SugarSync and they if they have problems it is understanding the cloud.... So maybe (if it dosen't exist already) I would like to have a animation of the proces with "flying" folders between desktops, clouds etc. Otherwise SugarSync is just great.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The process was smooth and well managed. There was probably good technical coordination and support. There were only minor details that could be improved.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SugarSync, like all solutions, has its place in the data storage stack within a company. The main reason SugarSync is better than the other solutions is that it enables me to leave my hard drive organized and keep my existing file trees. I don't have to constantly move or copy files to a specific folder if I want them backed up.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info