TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    Netskope Private Access

    Score9 out of 10
    N/ANetskope Private Access is a zero trust access solution, that allows users to provide remote access to applications running in the public cloud and private data center environments, and avoid the need for remote users to use a VPN through the corporate network to gain access to private applications.N/A

    SugarSync

    Score3.6 out of 10
    N/ASugarSync is a cloud storage and backup solution designed for small businesses.

    $7.50

    per month

    Pricing
    Netskope Private AccessSugarSync
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    100 GB
    $7.49
    per month
    250 GB
    $9.99
    per month
    500 GB
    $18.95
    per month
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    Netskope Private AccessSugarSync
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    Netskope Private AccessSugarSync
    Identity Management
    Comparison of Identity Management features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
    Feature
    Netskope Private Access
    10.0
    2 Ratings
    13% above category average
    SugarSync
    -
    Ratings
    Multi-Factor Authentication10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Endpoint Security
    Comparison of Endpoint Security features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
    Feature
    Netskope Private Access
    7.5
    3 Ratings
    18% below category average
    SugarSync
    -
    Ratings
    Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)7.53 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence
    Comparison of Threat Intelligence features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
    Feature
    Netskope Private Access
    6.8
    4 Ratings
    16% below category average
    SugarSync
    -
    Ratings
    Network Analytics7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Recognition7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Vulnerability Classification7.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Alerts and Reporting7.64 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Analysis6.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Threat Intelligence Reporting6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Automated Threat Identification6.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Zero Trust Security
    Comparison of Zero Trust Security features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
    Feature
    Netskope Private Access
    7.8
    4 Ratings
    10% below category average
    SugarSync
    -
    Ratings
    Continuous Verification8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Secure Web Gateways8.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Network Flow Control7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Network Traffic Analysis9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Segmentation Leveraging6.74 Ratings00 Ratings
    Admin Access Control9.04 Ratings00 Ratings
    Network Data Encryption7.34 Ratings00 Ratings
    Network Topology Mapping7.03 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
    Feature
    Netskope Private Access
    -
    Ratings
    SugarSync
    9.4
    8 Ratings
    11% above category average
    Versioning00 Ratings8.06 Ratings
    Video files00 Ratings9.05 Ratings
    Audio files00 Ratings10.05 Ratings
    Document collaboration00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    Access control00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    File search00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Device sync00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Cloud Storage Security & Administration
    Comparison of Cloud Storage Security & Administration features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
    Feature
    Netskope Private Access
    -
    Ratings
    SugarSync
    9.7
    8 Ratings
    11% above category average
    User and role management00 Ratings10.07 Ratings
    File organization00 Ratings9.08 Ratings
    Device management00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Cloud Storage Platform
    Comparison of Cloud Storage Platform features of Netskope Private Access and SugarSync
    Feature
    Netskope Private Access
    -
    Ratings
    SugarSync
    10.0
    8 Ratings
    14% above category average
    Performance00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Reliability00 Ratings10.08 Ratings
    Storage Reports00 Ratings10.06 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    Netskope Private AccessSugarSync
    Small Businesses
    No answers on this topic
    IDrive Online Backup and Object Storage e2
    Score9.1 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    No answers on this topic
    Apple iCloud
    Score8.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Forescout Vistaro Platform
    Score6.6 out of 10
    ownCloud
    Score9.2 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    Netskope Private AccessSugarSync
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.0
    (4 ratings)
    10.0
    (10 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    Usability
    9.0
    (3 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    Support Rating
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    8.0
    (1 ratings)
    -
    (0 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    Netskope Private AccessSugarSync
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Netskope
    For more suitable scenarios, it is more flexible to deploy NPA with granular access to third-party vendors and contractors. works well in hybrid and multi-cloud private application access. good use cases with DLP, logging, and zero trust. we required improvement if the customer needs full network layer access, as some of the legacy applications may need full network access. also, can we achieve better performance for latency-sensitive or real-time traffic like voice, video?
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    When doing daily jobs, if you’re sharing large files, I think Dropbox works a lot better but if you have a system where you’re working within that system and you want to be able to work with that system and have certain folders that you have access to all the time then SugarSync might be just the ticket.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Netskope
    • It enables remote users to connect the on premise or cloud hosted application.
    • It overcomes the drawbacks of VPN.
    • It only allows the genuine user to access the application.
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • Sync files in any folder - rather than forcing you to store them in a certain place (Although this can be confusing too)
    • Works in the background - although this is true for all
    • You can share with others - including those who do not use SugarSync
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Netskope
    • When a blocking alert pops up, the user could click to request it be enabled, making it easier to create the policy.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • Can only think of one thing. I have helped others to get going with SugarSync and they if they have problems it is understanding the cloud.... So maybe (if it dosen't exist already) I would like to have a animation of the proces with "flying" folders between desktops, clouds etc. Otherwise SugarSync is just great.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Netskope
    We are delighted with everything they are adding and how the product is growing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    1. Freemium model is the ideal marketing for an app like this. 2. Now their sync methods with Android are worse
    Read full review
    Usability
    Netskope
    As I said before, I find it´s UI very intuitive and it´s very easy to use and configure, everything is where it should be and allows for a good workflow. For the end user it´s only a login page that pops out automatically and close itself once it´s authenticated so it stay out of the way of the user.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Support Rating
    Netskope
    The support is good, but the problem is that even if you indicate that you prefer support in Spanish, the application indicates that it is available. I have never had a technician who spoke to me in Spanish.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    Customer service is amazing, they are always fast to respond and very helpful.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    Netskope
    The process was smooth and well managed.
    There was probably good technical coordination and support.
    There were only minor details that could be improved.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    No answers on this topic
    Alternatives Considered
    Netskope
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    SugarSync, like all solutions, has its place in the data storage stack within a company. The main reason SugarSync is better than the other solutions is that it enables me to leave my hard drive organized and keep my existing file trees. I don't have to constantly move or copy files to a specific folder if I want them backed up.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Netskope
    • Re-authentication improves the security.
    • Application access is more stable.
    • Due to frequent publisher upgrade user unable to connect the application.
    Read full review
    Ziff Davis Inc
    • There were some opensource alternatives but we wanted something with better support which SugarSync offers.
    • We achieved faster project collaboration with SugarSync.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots