Invited by the Vendor
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NGINX | Score9.1 out of 10 | Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees) | NGINX, a business unit of F5 Networks, powers over 65% of the world's busiest websites and web applications. NGINX started out as an open source web server and reverse proxy, built to be faster and more efficient than Apache. Over the years, NGINX has built a suite of infrastructure software products o tackle some of the biggest challenges in managing high-transaction applications. NGINX offers a suite of products to form the core of what organizations need to create… | N/A |
Portainer | Score9.9 out of 10 | N/A | Portainer is a centralized container management platform for containerized apps and IoT device management. It helps accelerate container adoption and reduce time-to-value on Kubernetes, Docker, and Swarm with a management portal, allowing users to deliver and manage containerized applications from the data center to the edge. Portainer helps - Reduce the operational complexity associated with multi-cluster management Bridge the skills gap and facilitate feature… | $0 |
| NGINX | Portainer | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
98% Would buy again 49 Answers | 100% Would buy again 94 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 45 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 87 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 50 Answers | 100% Happy with the feature set 94 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
92% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 34 Answers | 100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 75 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
96% Implementation went as expected 43 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 92 Answers | |
| NGINX | Portainer | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Application Servers |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| Container Management |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||
| NGINX | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Mirantis Kubernetes Engine Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Oracle WebLogic Server Score7.2 out of 10 | Amazon Elastic Container Service (Amazon ECS) Score8.7 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Red Hat JBoss EAP Score8.5 out of 10 | SUSE Rancher Score9.5 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| NGINX | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.3 | 8.5 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 9.0 | 9.1 |
| Usability | 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Support Rating | 8.0 | 9.1 |
| Implementation Rating | 8.0 | 9.1 |
| NGINX | Portainer | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | NGINX Screenshots | Portainer Screenshots |