OpenLM for Engineering Licensing vs. ServiceNow IT Asset Management

OpenLM can simplify the reporting of complex licenses with multiple toolboxes or products on one server. It covers most of our license server types, but not all. The academic version is reasonably priced (e.g. for educational institutions) giving 90% of the features, however setting it up on-premise was more complex than our original pilot would suggest. We couldn't do without it now.

As I have used it as a ticketing tool, so it has an ability to integrate very well with other softwares to help make co ordination in your work much easier. Whenever, I used to get a scenario from end user regarding an issue via chat, the service now window would pop up immediately as it was integrated.

Incentivized

• Peak concurrent license use for any period of time, often less than expected, saves unnecessary over purchase.
• Denials of license, can quickly see where a license is not working, say, after an upgrade.
• Comparison of license utilisation (% when near the limit).
• Quick check of expiring licenses.

• Single place portal for employees and IT for assets assigned
• Track the requests raised by employees and manage the historical record for reference

Incentivized

• You can share a link to a dynamic report (e.g. the last 365 days). The URL is very long but it can be used with a 3rd party short URL utility and shared with users.
• Upgrading to the latest version took a long time to troubleshoot, which left a short gap in the saved data.

• One quick thing is integration to reporting platforms like MS Power BI
• License levels because a normal user with an ITIL license cannot schedule reports..need another license there
• Easy way to track SLA for incident Management

Incentivized

X-Formation, OpenIT, JTB, Sassafras either more expensive for the particular task of managing and monitoring concurrent licenses, or they had a different set of features (such as Sassafras K2/Keyserver also for remote access)

We have used Zendesk in past and are able to achieve many functionalities. This tool was also providing almost the same capability but ServiceNow has some more features which [are] more user friendly and easy to use. The knowledge base article feature is very useful and that was not easy to manage with Zendesk. Change management feature was not available with Zendesk too.

Incentivized

• The academic version has paid for itself handsomely, including our setup costs. The ongoing strategic information saves costs.

• Positive: manage ticket in a short time.
• Positive: relationship with customer.
• Negative: use two tools in order to manage internally by the team.

Incentivized