OpenText AccuRev vs. SUSE Manager

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText AccuRev
Score 4.0 out of 10
N/A
AccuRev, a software configuration management offering, is now owned and supported by Micro Focus since the December 2013 acquisition, and now by OpenText.N/A
SUSE Manager
Score 10.0 out of 10
N/A
German company SUSE offers SUSE Manager, a software defined infrastructure Linux server configuration management tool supporting patching, provisioning of Linux servers, and related actions.N/A
Pricing
OpenText AccuRevSUSE Manager
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText AccuRevSUSE Manager
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText AccuRevSUSE Manager
Features
OpenText AccuRevSUSE Manager
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
OpenText AccuRev
-
Ratings
SUSE Manager
9.1
2 Ratings
13% above category average
Infrastructure Automation00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Automated Provisioning00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Parallel Execution00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Node Management00 Ratings10.02 Ratings
Reporting & Logging00 Ratings6.62 Ratings
Version Control00 Ratings9.52 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText AccuRevSUSE Manager
Small Businesses
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Salt
Salt
Score 6.2 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
Perforce P4
Perforce P4
Score 6.9 out of 10
Ansible
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText AccuRevSUSE Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
1.0
(4 ratings)
10.0
(12 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
6.1
(3 ratings)
9.2
(2 ratings)
Usability
-
(0 ratings)
9.5
(2 ratings)
Availability
7.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
-
(0 ratings)
7.5
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText AccuRevSUSE Manager
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Very slow and not intuitive; it would be my last choice for version control systems.The UI is a little confusing at times and seems a little outdated. It needs a lot of improvement. It is suited for small projects and fewer number of projects. But if there are huge projects and many projects to be maintained in a portfolio, its a little hard to manage.
Read full review
SUSE
In our specific use case, SUSE Manager is extremely useful. We're having a large landscape that is divided into intake, development, quality and production with a couple of different SUSE flavours that need to be automatically rolled out, configured, patched and maintained, everything from up to date repositories that are cloned on a daily basis straight from SUSE.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • One place for most recent code with history, avoid any conflict/confusion among other team/members.
  • Stream/Workflow approach to control approval process betwen all the teams, which I couldn't find in other version control tools I worked.
  • Bundle our code in a small group (called, Issues in Accurev) to differentiate between different projects.
Read full review
SUSE
  • Manages patch levels for most Linux OS by: date, group, cloud or custom channels
  • Uses a lite version of Salt to run commands or scripts on any numbers of servers at once.
  • Allows the joining of groups inside SUSE Manager to quickly access or work with servers so grouped.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • Ability to zoom in/out for stream-view. We currently have many streams/substreams and unable to view the entire workflow. Zooming in/out would benefit.
  • Being a designer, I use Adobe Flash and SWF files. When updating the SWF files, Accurev does not see these files as being changed and you will be unable to promote. In order to push changes, you must totally rename the SWF file.
Read full review
SUSE
  • The cloning of patches when using the content lifecycle module in a multi-environment landscape with many SLES flavours is a bit cumbersome.
  • More premade saltstate for default applications are always nice to have.
  • Upgrading SUMA could be easier, especially when a Postgres upgrade is also required.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
We will renew because it is part of our build process.
Read full review
SUSE
I am expanding the use of SUSE Manager throughout our organization and can't imagine going back to the "wild wild west" we had before.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
No answers on this topic
SUSE
The gui is extremely user friendly. The installation and configuration does have a learning curve, it takes a while to set everything up. But once you're passed this initial learning curve, everything is very intuitive. If you want extra automation, there's an api (eventough i personally find the documentation of the api could be ordered better). I gave this product a 9 because of the initial learning curve and the api documentation, but for the rest it suits my needs perfectly.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
No answers on this topic
SUSE
SUSE Manager provided a top-tier support person on site to us for two days to help integration. We did all the standard stuff they help with before he arrived. We were able to use him to get all the tricky stuff identified and solved in the short time we had. Had they sent us a lower-tier guy, it would have been a waste. I was impressed they sent such knowledgeable person.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
In my view, accurev ranks very low compared to other tools I have used. Microsoft TFS is the best in the industry as of today as it's a complete ALM solution. It does code version, bug tracking, user story documentation, and has easy integration with other external tools supporting many languages. So I would definitely recommend TFS to anyone.
Read full review
SUSE
The other competitors also have a good platform and service, but we went with SUSE due to cost. The price was best and we needed to keep under a certain budget. The functionality was perfect for what we needed so we took the step forward. This allows us to manage our Linux environment within the manager and update or deploy specific tasks to each as needed.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • Better team coordination.
  • Avoid confusion by having one place for all documentation and code.
  • Better project management by having different work streams.
Read full review
SUSE
  • Manages patch levels for most Linux OS by: date, group, cloud or custom channels
  • Make it easy to audit our own infrastructure.
  • Allows the joining of groups inside SUSE Manager to quickly access or work with servers so grouped.
  • 24/7 support team.
  • Automatic deployment.
Read full review
ScreenShots