OpenText AppEnhancer vs. Planview ProjectPlace
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenText AppEnhancer | Score6.1 out of 10 | N/A | OpenText AppEnhancer (formerly ApplicationXtender from EMC, acquired by OpenText in 2017) is designed to allow users to transform paper and digital content into application-ready information. It scans, stores, retrieves and preserves information and makes itaccessible within Line-of-Business applications and processes. AppEnhancer helps organizations take control of paper and digital documents in both on and off-premises applications, while being enterprise-ready for broader implementations. | N/A |
Planview ProjectPlace | Score8.3 out of 10 | N/A | Projectplace is a collaborative work management solution. The vendor says the product is built with teams of all sizes and complexity in mind, from virtual teams of five to entire global enterprises with tens of thousands of active users. It is also designed to incorporate waterfall and agile workflows. | N/A |
| OpenText AppEnhancer | Planview ProjectPlace | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| OpenText AppEnhancer | Planview ProjectPlace | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Would buy again 88 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 98% Delivers good value for the price 80 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Happy with the feature set 91 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 60 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 94% Implementation went as expected 63 Answers | |
| OpenText AppEnhancer | Planview ProjectPlace | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Project Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| OpenText AppEnhancer | Planview ProjectPlace | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | M‑Files Score8.9 out of 10 | Any.do Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Esker Score7.4 out of 10 | KanbanFlow Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | Tungsten Capture Score9.5 out of 10 | Microsoft To Do Score7.9 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| OpenText AppEnhancer | Planview ProjectPlace | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 7.7 | 8.1 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 9.2 |
| Usability | - | 10.0 |
| Availability | - | 9.1 |
| Performance | - | 9.1 |
| Support Rating | - | 8.0 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.1 |
| Configurability | - | 6.4 |
| Ease of integration | - | 9.1 |
| Product Scalability | - | 9.1 |
| Vendor post-sale | - | 6.4 |
| Vendor pre-sale | - | 6.4 |
| OpenText AppEnhancer | Planview ProjectPlace | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Reliability and Availability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Scalability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Planview ProjectPlace Screenshots |










