OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB vs. Progress Test Studio
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB | Score4 out of 10 | N/A | Formerly from Micro Focus, OpenText™ Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB discovers, maps, and manages IT configurations and can be deployed on-premises or via SaaS. It is used to increase IT visibility and reduce IT service disruptions with robust discovery, service dependency mapping, and proactive impact analysis. | N/A |
Progress Test Studio | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Progress Test Studio aims to be the easiest to use Web Automation tool on the market, widely used by Enterprise QA’s for testing, but easy enough for anyone. The product automates testing for WPF, Silverlight, Web, HTML, Angular, React, KUIB, iOS, Android, Mobile Web, and API’s. Test Studio is ideal for a no-code or low-code approach for: QA Test Automation, Application Monitoring, Performance and Load Testing, Web/Marketing Process Automation, and Mobile App Automation. | N/A |
| OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB | Progress Test Studio | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | Optional | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB | Progress Test Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
83% Would buy again 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
100% Delivers good value for the price 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
100% Happy with the feature set 6 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers | No answers on this topic | |
| OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB | Progress Test Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | TestComplete Score8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | OpenText UFT One Score8 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | SoapUI Open Source Score8.3 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB | Progress Test Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 8.0 | 9.0 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 5.0 | - |
| Usability | 7.0 | - |
| Support Rating | 7.0 | - |
| Implementation Rating | 6.0 | - |
| OpenText Universal Discovery and Universal CMDB | Progress Test Studio | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Usability |
| No answers on this topic |
| Support Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Implementation Rating |
| No answers on this topic |
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Progress Test Studio Screenshots |







