OpenText Magellan Analytics Suite leverages a comprehensive set of data analytics software to identify patterns, relationships and trends through data visualizations and interactive dashboards.
N/A
Worksection
Score10 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Worksection is a project management platform that brings tasks, planning, time tracking, team communication, and file storage into a single system. It provides task and subtask management, Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and a calendar for planning; built-in time tracking with hourly rates for client billing; per-task discussions, role-based access permissions, and reporting dashboards. Pricing is charged per user, with a free plan for up to five users. It is used by teams of 5 to 50+ employees in…
$5
per month per user
Pricing
OpenText Magellan
Worksection
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Free
$0
Basic
$5
per month per user
Business
$10
per month per user
Premium
$15
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Magellan
Worksection
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
All paid plans are priced per user. Annual billing −25%; 2-year billing −30%. Free plan for teams of up to 5 users.
More Pricing Information
Features
OpenText Magellan
Worksection
BI Standard Reporting
Comparison of BI Standard Reporting features of OpenText Magellan and Worksection
Feature
OpenText Magellan
7.0
2 Ratings
15% below category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Customizable dashboards
7.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Formatting Templates
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Ad-hoc Reporting
Comparison of Ad-hoc Reporting features of OpenText Magellan and Worksection
Feature
OpenText Magellan
8.3
3 Ratings
4% above category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Drill-down analysis
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Formatting capabilities
8.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with R or other statistical packages
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report sharing and collaboration
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Output and Scheduling
Comparison of Report Output and Scheduling features of OpenText Magellan and Worksection
Feature
OpenText Magellan
8.3
2 Ratings
1% above category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Publish to Web
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to PDF
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Versioning
9.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Report Delivery Scheduling
8.02 Ratings
00 Ratings
Data Discovery and Visualization
Comparison of Data Discovery and Visualization features of OpenText Magellan and Worksection
If you do not have a large budget and are a large organization, I would steer clear of Actuate. If you are looking to do very complex washboarding, I would not use them. Your developers have to be very skilled to work with this. Plan to bring in consultants if necessary to help your process. Adhoc reporting is weak. If your pricing is user based and you expand, this could be very expensive.
I can prescribe Worksection for computerized offices, for organizations that consider the season of their representatives and who pitch time to their clients
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I like adaptable assignments and subtasks, extended security for errands and remarks (since we are working with our customers inside Worksection) and inherent clock with hourly rates.
Worksection encourages us to break down complex undertaking into assignments and subtasks, set due dates and control time spent.
We additionally share reports from Worksection to our customers, it encourages us to assemble straightforward relations with our customers. What's more, we figure pay for our representative in view of these reports.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Issues with composing editorial - must reload page to write
Old style design
Unfortunately there is no work area customer, it would be exceptionally valuable. Continually fixing to the Internet, extremely awkward when it isn't. I have this happens all the time. I'm sitting tight for new forms and I trust that I won't be disillusioned.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I am no longer working for the company that was using Actuate but I believe they would continue to use it because the stitching costs would be to high. It would require a complete rewrite of the reports and the never version of Actuate (BIRT) even required an almost complete report rewrite
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is quite intuitive to use. It is fit specifically for doing sentiment, emotion, and intention analysis as well as text classification and text summarization. I would have given 10 if it is fit for the purpose of doing image processing and analysis as well. There is a huge market to analyze video and image data.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It is vastly superior to these in many ways, for complex reporting it is a much more sophisticated solution. Visualizations are very good. Javascript extensibility is very powerful, others don't support this or as well. Pentaho and MS are both OLAP oriented. Pentaho is moving more toward big data, which was not our primary focus. Others are stuck in the Crystal Reports Band metaphor.
I like flexible tasks and subtasks, expanded privacy for tasks & comments (because we are working with our clients inside Worksection) and built-in timer with hourly rates. Worksection helps us to decompose complex project into tasks and subtasks, set deadlines and control time spent.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Actuate can handle 50 to 60 sub reports inside a report very well.
Dynamically creating the datasource, chart, graph, reports are the main advantages. We can do any level of drilling, and can create a performance matrix dashboard efficiently.
With this application, we have essentially enhanced the nature of our work, because everything is organized and reasonable. It is exceptionally advantageous that we can interface the customer to Worksection, which streamlines activities.
Incredible cost. The greatest arrangement of 250 GB and a boundless number of "ventures", "organizations" and "individuals" on the record, makes this program the most beneficial - now it is $120 every month, considering the markdown when paying yearly. This is finished opportunity and trustworthiness - lead somewhere around 10 distinct organizations and 1000 individuals.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info