OpenText MBPM vs. Oracle WebLogic Server

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText MBPM
Score 7.2 out of 10
N/A
OpenText acquired BPM solution Metastorm in 2011, and has rebranded the product as OpenText MBPM. It is an alternative BPM solution to OpenText's primary BPM offering called OpenText Cordys Business Process Management.N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server
Score 6.9 out of 10
N/A
Oracle WebLogic Server is a unified and extensible platform for developing, deploying and running enterprise applications, such as Java, for on-premises and in the cloud. WebLogic Server offers a scalable implementation of Java Enterprise Edition (EE) and Jakarta EE.N/A
Pricing
OpenText MBPMOracle WebLogic Server
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText MBPMOracle WebLogic Server
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText MBPMOracle WebLogic Server
Features
OpenText MBPMOracle WebLogic Server
Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of Reporting & Analytics features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.0
3 Ratings
10% below category average
Oracle WebLogic Server
-
Ratings
Dashboards7.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Standard reports9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Custom reports4.03 Ratings00 Ratings
Process Engine
Comparison of Process Engine features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.3
3 Ratings
13% below category average
Oracle WebLogic Server
-
Ratings
Process designer8.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Process simulation7.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Business rules engine9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
SOA support6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Process player7.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Support for modeling languages8.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Form builder6.93 Ratings00 Ratings
Model execution6.13 Ratings00 Ratings
Collaboration
Comparison of Collaboration features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
7.6
3 Ratings
9% below category average
Oracle WebLogic Server
-
Ratings
Social collaboration tools7.63 Ratings00 Ratings
Content Management Capabilties
Comparison of Content Management Capabilties features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
6.0
2 Ratings
30% below category average
Oracle WebLogic Server
-
Ratings
Content management6.02 Ratings00 Ratings
Application Servers
Comparison of Application Servers features of Product A and Product B
OpenText MBPM
-
Ratings
Oracle WebLogic Server
8.1
36 Ratings
1% above category average
IDE support00 Ratings6.032 Ratings
Security management00 Ratings9.034 Ratings
Administration and management00 Ratings7.036 Ratings
Application server performance00 Ratings8.535 Ratings
Installation00 Ratings8.036 Ratings
Open-source standards compliance00 Ratings10.024 Ratings
Best Alternatives
OpenText MBPMOracle WebLogic Server
Small Businesses
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.4 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Square 9 Softworks
Square 9 Softworks
Score 9.4 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
Enterprises
CMW Platform
CMW Platform
Score 9.4 out of 10
NGINX
NGINX
Score 9.1 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText MBPMOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
7.1
(5 ratings)
7.5
(43 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.0
(4 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
9.0
(1 ratings)
7.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
6.0
(1 ratings)
Implementation Rating
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText MBPMOracle WebLogic Server
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Metastorm is well-suited for scenarios in which internal stress testing an application is needed in a hurry before showcasing it to potential customers. It supports different views of the process from Swimlane perspective, so different methodologies can be handled. It is an Enterprise level tool and handles both small and large projects quite well, although smaller companies may be stressed out by the amount of time it takes to properly maintain the application.
Read full review
Oracle
If you need to have complex options in place you can count on Weblogic to be a robust Applicational Server you can rely on. But you would need to keep an eye on maintaining the framework updated quite frequently to avoid security breaches and subsequent severe situations. If you don't have other infrastructure for test purposes, I wouldn't advise you on having devs and QA installing this heavy application in their local machines, there are other lightweight solutions that would be a better fit for that.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Complex routing of tasks based on calculated criteria
  • Linking between tasks and accessing relevant information
  • Organising, scheduling and prioritising
  • Different views for different people
Read full review
Oracle
  • The brand relation between Java and WebLogic Application Server usually provides a quicker access to programming features and their availability for the applications deployed.
  • The access to centralized configuration both from console and command line WLST eases the implementation of changes major or not in an organized and expedite way.
  • The maturity of the product is also visible in the available tools provided by the product itself, for both monitoring of resources and alerting for availability and thresholds
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • The Metastorm process engine is based on an older version of .NET. Updating to a newer version would resolve several known issues with .NET email functionality.
  • Metastorm builds web pages at run time. While the UI presented to the end user is fine, the Document Object Model is convoluted and subject to change with new releases. Providing a more simplified DOM or at very least a custom function to replace document.getElementById() would make client-side scripting a much more powerful tool.
  • One function that I've seen Metastorm competitors do well, is email wizards. Having a WYSIWYG email editor would be really nice.
Read full review
Oracle
  • Debugging issues has been difficult sometimes, the documentation is too dense and finding the the root cause for an specific issue takes time.
  • The Oracle WebLogic Server console UI feels old and gives a sense of lack of innovation even though it provides so much functionality.
  • I'm not sure if Oracle WebLogic Server supports more modern frameworks, but it feels more like a Java EE specific, maybe there's an opportunity there to appeal to newer application platforms
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
There are other products that seem to be a better fit for future initiatives.
Read full review
Oracle
No answers on this topic
Usability
OpenText
Although it is intuitive to use it does require training
Read full review
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Server has so many features that sometimes it's hard to find the right place to setup things, I think the dated user interface does not help with that either. This has a direct impact when deciding to use it as your application server, you'd need to have the right people and invest the time needed to master it. If you're application justifies it then it will definitely be a great choice in the long run.
Read full review
Performance
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Oracle
Oracle WebLogic Application Server is great at security, performance and features.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Great customer service for an API support related query
Read full review
Oracle
The Oracle support is not great sometimes. They take a long time and need a lot of data over and over to resolve issues.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
We found that OpenText MBPM held its own quite well against IBM BPM. We ended up choosing OpenText MBPM due to the analytics, complex routing, and the ease of SOA service integration. Furthermore, the ability to quickly develop simple User interfaces make this tool a daily component of our most-used toolbox components.
Read full review
Oracle
I believe the Oracle WebLogic Suite is probably a better all encompassing suite of development tools for the IT department. [It] is probably a bit more expensive than other competitors like Apache Tomcat or NGINX, but is worth the investment if you consider the savings from time to get code into production.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • The development of the ticketing system has enabled us to greatly improve customer relationships
  • The scheduling and allocation of the tasks has reduced both the number of open tickets and the turnaround time to resolution
  • Management information from the system has improved decision making
Read full review
Oracle
  • WebLogic Application Server definitely had a positive ROI since all the applications are deployed on a single platform and making maintenance extremely cost effective.
  • Since all major cloud vendors support and maintain WebLogic, it gives us an opportunity to explore possibilities to move the organizational infrastructure on to the cloud without too much effort.
Read full review
ScreenShots