OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi) vs. Zabbix

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Score 8.1 out of 10
N/A
OpenText Network Node Manager i is a network management platform acquired by Micro Focus from Hewlett-Packard Enterprise, and now supported by OpenText.N/A
Zabbix
Score 8.8 out of 10
N/A
Zabbix is an open-source network performance monitoring software. It includes prebuilt official and community-developed templates for integrating with networks, applications, and endpoints, and can automate some monitoring processes.N/A
Pricing
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Zabbix
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Zabbix
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Zabbix
Considered Both Products
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
Chose OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)
NNMi is best suited for enterprise-grade, large to very large infrastructure. You have fewer servers to install the product and manage all your devices through a single server, which also enhances ease of use.
Zabbix

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Zabbix
Small Businesses
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.1 out of 10
ConnectWise Automate
ConnectWise Automate
Score 8.5 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Intermapper
Intermapper
Score 8.4 out of 10
Icinga
Icinga
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Cisco Meraki Dashboard
Score 9.1 out of 10
ScienceLogic SL1
ScienceLogic SL1
Score 8.8 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Zabbix
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(5 ratings)
8.4
(28 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
-
(0 ratings)
9.0
(3 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(1 ratings)
8.6
(4 ratings)
Support Rating
1.0
(1 ratings)
5.0
(5 ratings)
Implementation Rating
-
(0 ratings)
8.0
(2 ratings)
User Testimonials
OpenText Network Node Manager i (NNMi)Zabbix
Likelihood to Recommend
OpenText
Well-suited for large-scale deployment without needing more servers. Linux installation is quite stable, and Polling of a large number of devices is well managed. Less suited to Network Observability scenarios or cloud network monitoring.
Read full review
Zabbix
Zabbix is great for monitoring your servers and seeing alerts when the system uses too much CPU or memory. This allowed the system Engineer to be proactive and add resources to these systems to avoid interrupting the services. Especially servers running operations applications and services. This is one of the best usages for Zabbix.
Read full review
Pros
OpenText
  • Fault and Performance Monitoring
  • Performance Reporting
  • Alerting and Flexible threhsolds
  • Product stability
Read full review
Zabbix
  • Collecting hardware data - CPU, Memory, Network, and Disk Metrics are collected and reported on.
  • Flexible design - It is very easy to build out even very large environments via the templating system. You can also start where you are - network monitoring, server monitoring, etc. and then build it out from there as time and resources permit.
  • Provides a "plugin architecture" (via XML templates) to allow end users to extend it to monitor all kinds of equipment, software, or other metrics that are not already added into the software already.
  • Very complete documentation. Almost every aspect of Zabbix has been documented and reported on.
  • Cost - Zabbix is FOSS software and always free. Support is reasonably priced and readily available.
Read full review
Cons
OpenText
  • More out of the box monitoring parameters features
  • Improved GUI
  • Independent reporting functionality within NNMi
Read full review
Zabbix
  • Creating an alert & its trigger can be made easier.
  • More VM-based data collection counters should be introduced to have better VM monitoring.
  • The raw counters collection agent in every node is relatively weak. It goes down often, which needs more stability.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Zabbix
It is free. It didn't cost anything to implement (other than my time and the cost incurred for it) and it is filling a badly needed gap in our IT infrastructure. Support is available if we have issues and can be done annually or paid for on a per incident basis as needed. Expansion, updates, and all other future lifecycle activities are likewise free of cost, so as long as someone is able to implement/maintain the software (and the OSS project is maintained) then I imagine the company will never leave it.
Read full review
Usability
OpenText
NNMi's user interface is described as well-designed and intuitive, making it easy for users to navigate and perform tasks quickly, thereby enhancing the overall user experience. The system offers a powerful network discovery mechanism that maps out your network's physical and virtual topology, enabling you to visualize connections between devices and identify potential issues. Fault monitoring is at its best. NNMi provides a unified environment for viewing faults, availability, and performance data, consolidating essential information into a single platform.
Read full review
Zabbix
I think every organization, especially the IT department, needs a tool like this. I know of another product like Zabbix that gives a similar or the same solution, but its range makes it very useful. You can see almost all the device info in one place: disk usage, disk space, network usage, etc.
Read full review
Support Rating
OpenText
Support is long and arduous and often are unable to help resolve the issue. We often have to do escalations or duty manager to get things moved. Even with a technical account manager, we do not see much improvement from a support point of view. This is an area where Micro Focus has a lot of improvement to do.
Read full review
Zabbix
The setup is the most time-consuming portion of using zabbix. It takes a lot of effort to shape it into a usable format and even then it can get very messy. It's not exactly intuitive and as mentioned the UI seems a bit antiquated. If I was to roll out a monitoring solution from scratch, I'd probably look for alternatives which are easier to use and maintain.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
OpenText
No answers on this topic
Zabbix
We are a mainly Windows environment, so it would be useful if we could have used Active Directory to deploy agents. As of version 4.2, Zabbix has announced a new agent MSI file to allow exactly that. Unfortunately, we didn't have that option. Also, for Linux and MAC deployments, there is no simple way to deploy that. Using remote scripts you may be able to create something, but most places will opt for either SNMP (agentless) or manual installation of agents to add to Zabbix. A way of deploying agents via discovery would go a long way to helping in the adoption of the tool.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
OpenText
Even though there are many products in the market such as from Solarwinds, CA Spectrum (no DX Spectrum), PRTG that offers similar or even with more flexibility the fault and performance monitoring still Micro Focus is a very nice tool when it comes to Scalability and Stability with all necessary monitoring coverage. There is no external database required and hence less issues with integration.
Read full review
Zabbix
We're using the Solarwinds suite as our global monitoring standard, but it is very complex and its licensing model makes it difficult to monitor a wide range of technologies. So, we're using Zabbix as a complement on our monitoring process. Zabbix is a way more flexible and has free integrations to a wide range of technologies. It is also more 'user friendly' and easy to manage.
Read full review
Return on Investment
OpenText
  • HP NNM is very good at producing root cause analysis. MTTR is reduced with NNM.
Read full review
Zabbix
  • Good ROI when trying to get ahead of network related problems instead of waiting for users to complain
  • Good ROI when doing upgrades or exploratory work on a neglected network
  • Good ROI when showing usage trends to management showing higher actual usage versus what was thought to be happening
Read full review
ScreenShots