TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    OpenText Optimost

    Score7 out of 10
    N/AOpenText Optimost is designed to help companies deliver engaging, profitable websites and campaigns and includes self-service capabilities. Optimost also provides white glove consulting to help companies test confidently when the stakes and complexity are highest; immediately when speed is of the essence, and to match the perfect content to every customer.N/A

    SiteSpect

    Score8 out of 10
    Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
    Key features include: - A/B, split, and multivariate testing campaign management - Targeting and personalization - Front-end usability testing - Back-end testing using Origin Experiments - Site acceleration with SiteSpect AMPS(R) - Mobile site and native app supportN/A
    Pricing
    OpenText OptimostSiteSpect
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    SiteSpect Enterprise
    $0
    SiteSpect Cloud
    $0
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    OpenText OptimostSiteSpect
    Free Trial
    NoYes
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoYes
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeRequired
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Best Alternatives
    OpenText OptimostSiteSpect
    Small Businesses
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Google Optimize
    Score6.7 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    AB Tasty
    Score8.6 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    Google Content Experiments (discontinued)
    Score7.3 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    OpenText OptimostSiteSpect
    Likelihood to Recommend
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    6.6
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    9.3
    (7 ratings)
    Support Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    In-Person Training
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Implementation Rating
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Configurability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    OpenText OptimostSiteSpect
    Likelihood to Recommend
    OpenText
    The ease of implementation combined with the managed services result in a tool that virtually anyone can use - implementation is less than 10 lines of code added to the relevant pages of the website (we simply added it to our master page template to have it available on any page) and from there the customer can be as involved or not involved as they wish. At BSI we are very hands on with the testing programme - usually developing and designing the tests ourselves and having HP build them, but if we wanted to HP to develop, design and build and limit our role to QA and review that is an option.
    Read full review
    SiteSpect, Inc.
    SiteSpect is great for businesses with available development resources and a need to provide flicker-free performance. Additionally, the month-to-month service model is attractive considering the contract and implementation prices of most of the tool's competitors. If an organization wants to run a lot of tests with a small team of marketers, I wouldn't recommend a tool as complex as SiteSpect. Effective use of the tool requires a lot of technical skill.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    OpenText
    • Because it is a managed service the need for intervention by our internal IT group was removed. This allowed us to control the pace of the testing programme without being influenced by IT resource allocation
    • The client and technical account managers are very good at suggesting tests or potential improvements
    • HP regularly holds custom forums which are always informative and provide an opportunity to learn from and network with peers and industry leaders
    Read full review
    SiteSpect, Inc.
    • It is able to intercept the code from your server, inject your code and then it continues on to the end-user's computer with virtually no speed interruptions.
    • It has several different options for performing A/B tests from regular factors to client-side factors, and origin experiments.
    • It is extremely flexible and configurable for the needs of your company or organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    OpenText
    • The dashboard interface is difficult to navigate, but I understand that they are currently developing/testing a new much more user friendly interface
    • The cost can be a barrier for some organisations, but for us it is worth it. Also they are in the process of releasing a less expensive self authoring testing tool.
    Read full review
    SiteSpect, Inc.
    • SiteSpect recently came out with a feature to test and optimize mobile applications. I have not used this, but it fills an important capability gap with the product I was using at the time.
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    OpenText
    We have not only renewed our subscription three years running, but we have added the self authoring tool and are looking to expand the subscription so that we can take advantage of the managed services on a global level.
    Read full review
    SiteSpect, Inc.
    Our clients who use our fully managed A/B and Multivariate testing services have been extremely happy with the results. Therefore the D&W and SiteSpect partnership continues to flourish. We have no hesitation in recommending the platform and we will continue to invest in our staff to train on this platform for the foreseeable future
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    SiteSpect, Inc.
    When we have any questions on how the tool can be utilized for some unique requirements, they always make excellent suggestions.
    Read full review
    Implementation Rating
    OpenText
    No answers on this topic
    SiteSpect, Inc.
    Just need to have your requirements ready such as, what you are expecting from the tool, is there anything specific you want regarding reporting, tracking etc.
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    OpenText
    We evaluated Optimost again Adobe's similar offering (Target). The big difference between the two and the reason why BSI choose Autonomy was the managed service aspect. The idea that once the code was deployed on the site IT no longer had to be involved gave my team full ownership of the testing programme. With the Adobe product, the involvement of the internal IT group would have been required to launch each test - and this would have decreased the number of tests we could run each month. Back in the day I also used offermatica/omniture and this too required IT involvement.
    Read full review
    SiteSpect, Inc.
    I have used all the tools in the market. Sitespect kicks them into the curb based on how easy it is to build variations, and hot it doesnt interfere with client load.
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    OpenText
    • Use HP Optimost was the primary driver behind a 40% increase in UK classroom training courses booked online read more details here: http://www.autonomy.com/work/news/details/hsx6767d
    • HP Optimost testing led to a 9% increase in sales by improving the BSI Shop's checkout funnel in 2012
    • HP Optimost is integral to the success of BSI's continuous improvement testing programme
    Read full review
    SiteSpect, Inc.
    • Easily test and optimize the effectiveness of landing pages, layouts, variations of copy, different offers, photos, navigation elements, links, buttons, and more – all without having to change your existing site.
    Read full review
    ScreenShots