Oracle WebCenter Sites is the new name for FatWire which Oracle acquired in 2011. It is a complete CMS often bundled with other Oracle WebCenter products to present a more comprehensive management solution for businesses and enterprises.
N/A
Progress Sitefinity
Score 7.6 out of 10
N/A
Progress Sitefinity is a content management and customer analytics platform. It supports content management, tailored marketing, multi-channel management, and ecommerce sites.
N/A
Pricing
Oracle WebCenter Sites
Progress Sitefinity
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Oracle WebCenter Sites
Progress Sitefinity
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Oracle WebCenter Sites
Progress Sitefinity
Features
Oracle WebCenter Sites
Progress Sitefinity
Security
Comparison of Security features of Product A and Product B
Oracle WebCenter Sites
7.0
4 Ratings
16% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
163 Ratings
2% below category average
Role-based user permissions
7.04 Ratings
8.1163 Ratings
Platform & Infrastructure
Comparison of Platform & Infrastructure features of Product A and Product B
Oracle WebCenter Sites
5.5
4 Ratings
34% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.1
144 Ratings
2% below category average
API
5.03 Ratings
8.1137 Ratings
Internationalization / multi-language
6.03 Ratings
8.1106 Ratings
Web Content Creation
Comparison of Web Content Creation features of Product A and Product B
Oracle WebCenter Sites
6.8
5 Ratings
13% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
170 Ratings
8% above category average
WYSIWYG editor
8.04 Ratings
8.1160 Ratings
Code quality / cleanliness
8.03 Ratings
8.0151 Ratings
Admin section
8.04 Ratings
8.0168 Ratings
Page templates
6.04 Ratings
8.1164 Ratings
Library of website themes
7.02 Ratings
8.0104 Ratings
Mobile optimization / responsive design
3.04 Ratings
8.0155 Ratings
Publishing workflow
6.04 Ratings
8.1152 Ratings
Form generator
8.63 Ratings
8.0140 Ratings
Web Content Management
Comparison of Web Content Management features of Product A and Product B
Oracle WebCenter Sites
6.2
4 Ratings
18% below category average
Progress Sitefinity
8.0
164 Ratings
15% above category average
Content taxonomy
7.04 Ratings
8.1157 Ratings
SEO support
7.03 Ratings
8.1151 Ratings
Bulk management
6.04 Ratings
8.0122 Ratings
Availability / breadth of extensions
4.03 Ratings
8.0130 Ratings
Community / comment management
7.03 Ratings
8.0121 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Oracle WebCenter Sites
Progress Sitefinity
Small Businesses
ManageWP
Score 10.0 out of 10
Bloomreach - The Agentic Platform for Personalization
Oracle WebCenter Sites is very well suited to presenting marketing content in all shapes and forms, including mobile, an in a corporate web site. Oracle WebCenter Sites can also manage small product catalogs easily. Important things to consider when selecting a CMS:
How important is the ease with which my business users update content?
How often are updates made?
How distributed are my business contributors?
How important is preview in my organization's workflow and publishing process?
Progress Sitefinity remains a little heavyweight for sites that require basic text content, or a limited number of pages. However, its flexibility (including the range of different content types if supports) make it a good choice for any organization requiring advanced content management capabilities at an affordable price.
'Low-code structured content' (dynamic content types) is one of Sitefinity's most powerful features that allows you to structure content according to business needs, while at the same time dampening editorial freedom to ensure accessibility, meta enhancement, SEO and API consumption can be achieved.
Sitefinity's content provider model allows us to flexibly (by means of admin interface) easily aggregate or separate content sharing within a multi-site instance.
This proofs particularly powerful in emerging situations where there suddenly is a demand for content sharing across countries or regions.
Adaptability at its core.
While there's never a perfect fit for everything, it allows for easy code customization and extension being a .NET application at heart. Giving it a corporate edge over other custom solutions, whether it is on the development side or deployment side (on premise, IaaS or Azure DevOps Paas). And it has enabled us to put the system to use in its core feature - which is to manage content, where on other occasions we were able to take full advantage of its features such as A/B testing and personalization.
Diagram or illustrate more use cases for server setups, and managing of upgrades.
I'd like to see the ability to synchronize from one server to multiple others at once.
Implementation assistance as part of the purchase rather than farming out to 3rd party, although they did answer every question we asked in order to determine our best architecture setup.
A valuable tool for enabling marketers and business users to easily create and manage contextually relevant social and interactive online experiences across multiple channels on a global scale to drive sales and loyalty. It also allows multi-site management (in fact Sites) using the assets and template developed, without having to re-implement again for each individual site.
Very big fan of this CMS, as it allows scalability, performance, and everything else. The support is great whenever we need it. As a marketer, the digital/marketing side of things is very easy to use and we've seen strong results from an SEO and marketing perspective. I can't speak to the developer/creative side too much, but in talking with these teams, they do recommend the tool as well.
The WebCenter Sites Support team is extremely good and very responsive to client needs. They are quick to resolve Level 1 issues and when escalated to Level 2, the team makes every effort to keep the client informed.
Support can be pretty good, even though, depending on the level of licensing, it can take longer to hear back from their team. They do have a phone option, which works well. Overall, they are knowledgeable, and helpful when needed. At times, support is able to access the system directly and troubleshoot critical items when needed.
N/A - I was not part of the implementation team. We have had this internally for over 5 years. Based on my experience, ensure that you have documentation on the initial implementation and subsequent upgrades. I would also recommend to have all the documentation on how and why the system was implemented the way it was
There are lot of WCM products available in the market, some free and some licensed. But for a organisation using more Oracle products and on Java technology, WCS is the best in class, for intranet and internet needs. It has everything which is required for a web application. Also it can be well integrated with other platforms with Oracle Document Cloud/Oracle Content/Oracle Identity Manager and a lot more. Its a well integrated product. It can also be integrated with social media using a community plugin. It also comes with its own search and analytics tools. The templates are pure JSP and can be easily coded by Java developers using the development guide. Its based on Java, so writing custom applications and integrating is easy
It is hands down just easier for our customers to use. The interface and the page builder experience is much better than what we have used in the past and has many enterprise features even in the lower price-point
It has alleviated some of the burden on our IT staff.
It has allowed our Marketing department to be more hands-on with content changes, and they have more flexibility with the types of changes and how often they make them.