Orangescrum is an integrated project management platform providing tools for task tracking, resource allocation, and project lifecycle management. The platform is available via a cloud-based SaaS model (Orangescrum Cloud) or through on-premises deployment. Deployment Options Cloud (SaaS): Managed hosting with automated maintenance and updates. On-Premises: Self-managed deployment for organizations requiring local data control and specific infrastructure…
$29
per month
Project Insight
Score4 out of 10
N/A
Project Insight is a web-based project and portfolio management software. Project teams can access, edit and update their projects information anytime, anywhere, with any supported browser, tablet and mobile device. Features for experienced project managers include: MS Project import/export, intelligent scheduling, resource allocation, Outlook integration, document management, approvals, time/expense tracking, issue management, 100s of dashboards and advanced permissions.
$45
per user or volume licensing options.
Pricing
Orangescrum
Project Insight
Editions & Modules
Basic Unlimited
$29
per month
Pro Unlimited
$69
per month
Premium Unlimited
$349
per month
Startup
starting at $2454
per year 50 users (minimum)
Professional
starting at $4914
per year 50 users (minimum)
Enterprise
starting at $9600
per year 50 users (minimum)
Enterprise
Custom
Enterprise
$45
per user or volume licensing options.
Free
Sign Up & invite your team
#3 ADD-ONS
Grow as you go
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Orangescrum
Project Insight
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
Orangescrum
Project Insight
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Orangescrum and Project Insight
Feature
Orangescrum
8.1
1 Ratings
5% above category average
Project Insight
4.3
2 Ratings
56% below category average
Task Management
10.01 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Resource Management
10.01 Ratings
3.02 Ratings
Gantt Charts
10.01 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Scheduling
7.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
5.01 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Team Collaboration
10.01 Ratings
4.02 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
9.01 Ratings
3.01 Ratings
Document Management
6.01 Ratings
1.02 Ratings
Email integration
5.01 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Mobile Access
10.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
10.01 Ratings
2.01 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
4.01 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Orangescrum and Project Insight
This is a good thing for medium/large companies for inside the company and/or for interacting with remote employees/freelancers. As the program facilitates the interaction between employees and managers it speeds up the distribution of tasks and allows managers to identify possible problems on the fly. For indie developers - it's a little expensive.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
My rating would vary depending on the types of projects that need to be managed. Since I am in software, I don't think it was an excellent fit to manage software projects unless they are small projects with only a few tasks. On the other hand, if you are needing to manage a wide range of departments that are working on a single project with many moving pieces, then I would think that PI might be a better fit. Think of it as a jack of all trades, but master of none.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I found Project Insight somewhat opaque overall. I thought the training was sparse and answers to questions few and far in between. There was a lot of power there for the dedicated user/administrator. For me, who was a casual user and administrator, I found support lacking. I didn't administer Project Insight much, just some work on integrations with other tools.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Trello was excellent, but we did not choose it because of the price and relatively positive feedback from employees using Orangescrum who wanted the easiest and fastest way to create reports so as not to be distracted from work (as a two-click report).
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When I got to the company where I used Project Insight, we had our own custom tool that fit the tasks that it was designed for but wouldn't grow with the company unless resources were put onto expanding capabilities. We needed something more.
We replaced that tool with Redmine. It worked well and was easy to use, but it looked pretty dated when we got it, and since we didn't have many resources for managing, it looked dated after a few years without receiving upgrades. It was a decent tool for small teams that were focused on similar tasks. Redmine was much more straightforward than Project Insight and felt more reliable since we never had an issue with our internal servers. On the other hand, Redmine felt dated and didn't fit as many of the tasks that were needed. Redmine's price was right if you installed it locally and was probably still cheaper if you used their SAAS version.
Jira, on the other hand, felt like an excellent tool for software teams. Jira had a great project and task management and felt right for a software team. Jira also had useful integrations, even with Project Insight. Jira seemed pretty unreliable, worse than Project Insight. Our team would have preferred Jira, but I think it didn't work for other teams.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info