PeopleFluent includes modules for recruiting, performance management, compensation, learning, succession, and vendor management, as well as workforce planning and diversity. These modules can be purchased separately or bundled, and integrate with other HR systems.
N/A
VAIRKKO
Score 7.5 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
VAIRKKO offers a unique a-la-carte software eco-system offering both Learning Management and HR Products all from within a single platform. Users can purchase only the modules that they want, when they want them. Solutions to meet organizations' needs include Tracking Training, Learning Management Systems(LMS), HRIS (Human Resources Information System), Performance Management, Onboarding, Applicant Tracking, Policy and Document Management.
$1
per month per user
Pricing
PeopleFluent
VAIRKKO
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
PeopleFluent
VAIRKKO
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$500 one-time fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
PeopleFluent
VAIRKKO
Features
PeopleFluent
VAIRKKO
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
8.0
11 Ratings
9% above category average
VAIRKKO
-
Ratings
New hire portal
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Compliance tracking and reporting
8.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
8.2
11 Ratings
12% above category average
VAIRKKO
-
Ratings
Corporate goal setting
9.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Subordinate goal setting
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Individual goal setting
9.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance tracking
7.09 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
6.5
11 Ratings
4% below category average
VAIRKKO
-
Ratings
Performance plans
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Plan weighting
4.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Manager note taking
7.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review status tracking
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Rater nomination workflow
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Review reminders
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow restrictions
5.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
7.07 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
6.3
8 Ratings
9% below category average
VAIRKKO
-
Ratings
Create succession plans/pools
7.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate ranking
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate search
6.08 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate development
6.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent
9.5
8 Ratings
27% above category average
VAIRKKO
-
Ratings
Job Requisition Management
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Company Website Posting
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Publish to Social Media
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Job Search Site Posting
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customized Application Form
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resume Management
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Duplicate Candidate Prevention
6.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Candidate Search
9.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Applicant Tracking
10.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Collaboration
10.04 Ratings
00 Ratings
Task Creation and Delegation
10.03 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email Templates
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
User Permissions
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Notifications and Alerts
9.06 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
10.05 Ratings
00 Ratings
Learning Management
Comparison of Learning Management features of Product A and Product B
PeopleFluent has eliminated the use of paper reviews. It is also eliminated the use of scanning, emailing or interoffice mail. It is a great tool for communication and I highly recommend it. However, in some ways, the product can be improved. Some processes are tied to each other and could function in tandem. For example, while completing the self-review, the employee has to capture multi-raters. If self-review is submitted without listing multi-rater names then multi-rater review has to be captured separately on paper. In my opinion, these two processes can be different. Multi-raters should be added/removed/modified after submitting self-review.
VAIRKKO is very well-suited to track HR information and scheduling. It is a bit more difficult to create training and disseminate it to employees, but once you get past the learning curve, it works nicely. It's easy to track your employees' certifications and credentials, with reminders for recertifying and the ability to update certs as needed. Scheduling is not difficult, and one can track staffing issues easily.
It was very easy to go through resumes, choose the people you wanted to interview and set up the interviews.
It is great at keeping track of people that have come through hiring process in the past so you do not waste time on those that have already been declined or are sent in by multiple vendors.
The handling of time sheets and expense reports is very easy to manage.
The interface is a little confusing. I'm not sure if it's something that can be fixed in implementations, or if it's inherent to PeopleFluent, but there are almost too many tabs asking for too much information. A lot of it can be repetitive as well.
Changing your password/resetting your password seems to be nightmarish. It requires an organization ID as well as security questions, and forces you to reset your password far too often. I really dislike that feature.
Honestly, PeopleFluent itself looks pretty outdated. I feel as though the entire application really needs a facelift to be more current.
When I update an employee's general information page - if they do not have Custom User name listed - it puts my name in there and my password - when this happens the information I added is not going to be saved. If I am working on the top of the page - I don't see this unless I remember to check. Please don't let this be an automatic fill in.
Too many search tools - highlighting the most used would be great
When a person's schedule is changed - you lose their previous schedule. So when we need to look back and see when a person worked but realize they changed shifts and we no longer have it in Vairkko - it becomes very challenging.
PeopleFluent continues to develop an already high quality product and works to continually improve the user experience. The different modules integrate well, and the administrative functions are easy to understand and perform resulting in less time spent with KTLO functions. They provide world class customer service and work hard to keep you engaged as a customer.
PeopleFluent seems to have all the functionality one would need, but it can be a bit overwhelming. Depending on the client implementation, it can be downright confusing and not intuitive. My 6 rating comes from the fact that it seems like the system can be configured to actually be confusing and not make sense. I think a VMS should be set up not to allow a customer to configure it in such a way as to not really work, or to allow users to circumvent steps. I also really don't like the "organization key" that needs to be entered every time you log in. Why is a login and password good enough for 99% of the systems out there, but PeopleFluent requires an extra field?
I would rate this ATS system a 9 as there's some room for improvement as mentioned prior. I really love the design and its functionality buttons and the way I can integrate it with other systems. I would really love to see a more detailed reporting metrics long with super candidate filters when searching profiles.
Its great, its very versatile and stacks up very well against the competition. In terms of usability and ease of use, anyone can quickly learn how to use PeopleFluent. Again, the faults against the system would be when a client who is running the tool customizes it to their liking. Not to mention it's a very popular tool that i have had the pleasure of working in twice now with two different organizations.
I do believe that goal setting and the workflow of following up, going through the process yearly is as good as you make it. If you set good goals, or help your team make good goals then the experience can go well. Otherwise it's just another thing that an employee is doing to make their manager happy.
I am not sure the cost of the product, but if it is really expensive I am not sure that we are getting fully what we should be for what the product offers. Make sure you are using what is offered.