Planview AgilePlace vs. Workamajig

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Planview AgilePlace
Score 8.7 out of 10
N/A
AgilePlace is a project management solution built around flexibility, data-driven analytics, and workflow automation. The software was acquired by Planview in December 2017 to expand that company's capabilities.
$19
per user, per month
Workamajig
Score 6.2 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
Planview AgilePlaceWorkamajig
Editions & Modules
Teams
$19
per user, per month
Scaled Teams
$29
per user, per month
Custom
Contact Sales for Quote
per user, per month
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Planview AgilePlaceWorkamajig
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll editions include unlimited boards.—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Planview AgilePlaceWorkamajig
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
Planview AgilePlaceWorkamajig
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
7.0
21 Ratings
2% below category average
Workamajig
4.9
13 Ratings
42% below category average
Task Management7.921 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Resource Management7.319 Ratings5.513 Ratings
Gantt Charts6.712 Ratings6.16 Ratings
Scheduling6.517 Ratings5.011 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology7.917 Ratings3.07 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology6.812 Ratings3.07 Ratings
Document Management6.57 Ratings4.013 Ratings
Email integration7.315 Ratings5.510 Ratings
Mobile Access6.812 Ratings1.08 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking6.44 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Change request and Case Management6.68 Ratings4.08 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.07 Ratings00 Ratings
Workflow Automation00 Ratings4.011 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings5.013 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.010 Ratings
Agile Development
Comparison of Agile Development features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
7.3
5 Ratings
4% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
DevOps Tool Integrations7.33 Ratings00 Ratings
Dependencies and Blockers7.35 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Planview AgilePlace
-
Ratings
Workamajig
6.7
10 Ratings
10% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.97 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings6.010 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Planview AgilePlaceWorkamajig
Small Businesses
Craft
Craft
Score 8.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 9.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
GitLab
GitLab
Score 8.9 out of 10
SAP Ruum
SAP Ruum
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
Miro
Miro
Score 9.0 out of 10
Quickbase
Quickbase
Score 9.2 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Planview AgilePlaceWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
7.9
(27 ratings)
6.0
(13 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
7.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.2
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.3
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
10.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
7.7
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
7.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
8.0
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
9.3
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
9.3
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Planview AgilePlaceWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
Planview
This tool enables the visual management needed in many offshore teams to easily and quickly see the pending work, work in progress and completed work.For teams that work with a waterfall methodology and do not have AGILE internalized, I believe there are other solutions from Planview or other providers.
Read full review
Workamajig
If you're looking for a system to help you address accounting that's not suited for marketing agency structures, this is the right tool. It is a bit cumbersome, but it has streamlined our reporting, billing, estimating, and tracking. As for project management, it's great that it integrates with the estimating and finances, but it's just not enjoyable to use. The interface is clunky. So if project management is your main criteria, I'd choose something else. We would never use it to collaborate with clients either because I'd be afraid of making them frustrated by the tool, so we use Basecamp to do that.
Read full review
Pros
Planview
  • Ability to color code cards based on type, giving better visibility to the variety of tasks a team handles
  • Ability to set deadline dates and have those dates easily visible
  • Flexibility in design the kanban board. It is easy to add a lane or make a change on the fly. Work doesn't have to stop and a long process created to make simple layout changes.
  • Movement of cards is easy as well as the ability to connect cards to show dependencies.
Read full review
Workamajig
  • The Platinum version has a particularly robust time tracking system, down to a 'timer' function that can be critical for an agency like mine where you want to be accountable for billing a client arruately
  • The ability to make projects available only to those who are permitted to assign their time to it has apparently been very helpful during our revenue reconciliation meetings where time incurred is reviewed against scope
  • The mobile app, while I still feel needs some work, is pretty handy for a quick calendar check if I'm in a client meeting and cannot utilize my browser to get information
Read full review
Cons
Planview
  • Planview LeanKit currently can't or should not be used as a central spot for data and collaboration. Particularly attachments are not well-handled.
  • The portable side of Planview LeanKit is really lacking.
  • We would appreciate some options to group or stack cards.
Read full review
Workamajig
  • WMJ's interface is dated. Despite an html5 driven "sheets"-based interface, it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the interface, which could be streamlined considerably. On a UX/UI scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, WMJ would earn a 6 from me.
  • Despite the amount of documentation available, there is a distinct lack of clarity in that documentation, and it doesn't fully cover everything you would expect. Branching thoughts, for instance, are not addressed. Additionally, because there are two editions of the software online, there are two support sites that aren't sequestered. So information from both commingles, creating confusion.
  • Support is available on an email and phone basis. They strongly encourage you to use email, however, and they are resistant to phone time. This is likely because the support staff is limited in number, but has a great depth of knowledge. If you want immediate phone support, however, YOU ARE OUT OF LUCK. You are placed in a queue and the odds of same-day help are low. For email, the response is usually within an hour, but when you are stuck with a configuration issue, or need to generate a report and don't know how to do something, waiting is not optimal. That said, the support team is TERRIFIC.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Planview
Perfect tool to manage requirement backlog
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Usability
Planview
LeanKit isn't the best designed Kanban system I've seen, but overall it's pretty usable. The boards I've used are pretty complex, so it can be difficult to find things. I found that searching and filtering for specific cards was somewhat of a challenge. Dragging a card from one lane to another is kind of a fun way to get things done though.
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
Planview
Very minimal outages
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Performance
Planview
Never experienced major slowness
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Planview
It solves all our needs at this time.
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
Planview
Very easy.
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Planview
I think that LeanKit is very similar to Asana's Kanban feature and Trello, but is much less sleek looking than Asana. Asana's clean and sleek UI makes me enjoy project management much more than LeanKit. It might sound silly that the UI makes so much of a difference to me, but it really does. Trello is also sleeker than LeanKit, but I still prefer Asana because it has more customization options and a better interface. We are actually going to look into switching to ClickUp because we wanted something with a better UI. ClickUp seems to have a great UI with a lot of customization options.
Read full review
Workamajig
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on premises server behind a VPN although now there are plenty of cloud based solutions that have security compliance greater than what we can provide (fedRamp, etc.)
Read full review
Scalability
Planview
Good use cases for small/large teams
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
Planview
  • Our team meetings are more direct and quick to get through thanks to the better visibility of the workload
  • Easily being able to move cards between team lanes gives instant visibility to where the responsibility for the next step is needed.
Read full review
Workamajig
  • The agency switched to an hourly allocation so our clients were subject to a certain amount of hours each quarter. JIG helped us keep track of who was going over hours or who had some to spare. Once the clients went over we would use JIG to help charge the additional fees for going over. It helped keep clients accountable.
  • It was used to keep track of time sheets and through those time sheets, the directors were able to make a case for more employees on certain accounts. The corporate team hired 3 additional people that were truly needed and our time sheets helped reflect that.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Planview AgilePlace Screenshots

Screenshot of Real-Time Analytics: Utilize board health metrics involving bottlenecks, WIP, and throughput to guide the optimization of workflows, improve velocity, and better prioritize efforts for more predictable delivery. Lean and Agile metrics can be used to assess team performance and promote continuous improvement.Screenshot of PI Planning: Offers enterprise Kanban boards to visualize the work of teams regardless of the methodologies they apply or workflows they follow, and insights into progress and create opportunities for better alignment.Screenshot of Dependency Visualization and Management: Surfaces risks to plans resulting from cross-team dependency conflicts, blockers, and capacity constraints, and helps drive proactive measures to enable teams to deliver on time.Screenshot of Team Planning and Coordination: Boards can be used to breakdown work, build and manage plans, and execute against strategy to deliver more value to customers, faster.