plista GmbH vs. StackAdapt
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
plista | N/A | N/A | plista GmbH, based in Torstrasse, Berlin, is a global platform for data-driven native advertising. They offer advertisers and publishers direct, single-source access to a range of native solutions. Via their proprietary "Recommendation Technology", plista states that they are able to target individual recommendations of content and advertising to users of Sites within the plista-network. plista was founded in 2008 and is offered on four continents. | N/A |
StackAdapt | Score7.2 out of 10 | N/A | StackAdapt, headquartered in Toronto offers their native advertising specialized DSP, supporting programmatic advertising with audience discovery, B2B targeting, and engagement analytics among other features. | N/A |
| plista | StackAdapt | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic | No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Required | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | plista's fee for delivery of Advertiser campaigns is based on the following pricing models: ▪“CPC” or “Cost per Click” ▪ “CPO” or “Cost per Order” ▪ “CPM” or “Cost per Mille” ▪ “CPL” or “Cost per Lead” ▪ “CPE” or “Cost per Engagement” ▪ “CPV” or “Cost per View” ▪ “CPI” or “Cost per Install” The amount of payment for Publisher services is "determined by the respective agreed share of the net sales generated and achieved on each advertising space after deduction of campaign-related marketing costs, plus any possible applicable VAT. Possible charges for handling, delivery and tech service, which plista charges directly to the advertiser, are not part of net sales proceeds." (https://www.plista.com/publisher/publisher-gtc) | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| plista | StackAdapt | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Would buy again 12 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Delivers good value for the price 13 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Happy with the feature set 13 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 90% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 9 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 100% Implementation went as expected 10 Answers | |
| plista | StackAdapt | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Amazon Advertising Sponsored Products Score5.5 out of 10 | Basis DSP Score9 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | Amazon Advertising Sponsored Products Score5.5 out of 10 | The Trade Desk Score9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | AdSense Score8.6 out of 10 | ![]() Yahoo DSP Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| plista | StackAdapt | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | - | 8.2 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 8.2 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.5 |
| plista | StackAdapt | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | No answers on this topic |
|
| Pros | No answers on this topic |
|
| Cons | No answers on this topic |
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered | No answers on this topic |
|
| Return on Investment | No answers on this topic |
|
| ScreenShots |




