Proofy from the company of the same name (Proofy.io) headquartered in Hong Kong is a pay-for-check email verification service.
N/A
ZeroBounce
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
ZeroBounce is an email list validator that removes all invalid email addresses to prevent bounces and preserve the sender's reputation.
$39
one-time fee 2,000 emails
Pricing
Proofy
ZeroBounce
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
Pay-as-you-Go
$39
one-time fee starting at 2000 credits
ZeroBounce ONE
$99
per month starting with 10000 credits
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Proofy
ZeroBounce
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
Plans scale to provide additional validations. A discount of ZeroBounce ONE is available for annual billing. Enterprise customers who need to validate more than 1,000,000 email addresses per month should contact the ZeroBounce sales team for a customized quote.
The system is feasible, and they have an superb customer service team always amenable to help when desired. It proffer a very great service and a free trial for new users. Very speedy and forthright to use and very inexpensive. Great tool to verify emails, its all good about the product work very fluently and entirely attractive
At the outset of my position with my current company, we used a marketing automation system that was known as a swiss army knife: it could do many things, but none of them well. They had no built in functionality for boosting email deliverability. Digging in to find out what we could do to improve our authority, we learned we needed to clean our lists before sending. ZeroBounce does everything we need it to, and at a reasonable price. What more could you want?
Bulk List validation up to 25 IDs per action is useful in some situations, as we don't want to create a CSV file every time, and for this smaller number.
We sometimes use the email Finder option when we can't find an email for a person on any other platform.
I think they could generate an expansion of the number of emails to thousands I have had some scanning problems; I am not sure if it is something overcrowded.
Navigating among bulk validation, CSV upload, and single-ID validation is hard, and sometimes finding them or switching between them can be made more user-friendly.
Results: After bulk validation, we receive the results in a Zip file, which is useful sometimes but not every time, as we have to un-zip, and there will be a different CSV file for each result. The final results can be made simple, like email ID in column A, results (valid or Invalid) in column B.
For the large suite of services that they offer their system is pretty easy to understand and navigate. ZeroBonce is also NOT one of those services that is constantly tweaking their UI and making it hard to find tasks that you regularly use. More complex tasks can be more challenging but that's understandable. They also have an extensive restful API that if technical enough allow you to automate some of your most used tasks. They stand behind their product with good documentation as well as high quality customer service.
We have used ZeroBounce for about 18 months and it works flawlessly. We are able to get all of our questions/issues answered immediately. Felt very comfortable with the product immediately - used their web site which walked us through it and were able to get up and running within minutes. I really haven't had any issues that required support.
The server of the Lusha Extension was very low that's why leave the software and the results of proofy was just amazing overall. We love the adeptness to send a bulk email list, as well as integrate the platform with API. overall features are very effective and very easy to use.
We considered AtData since it was recommended by a colleague who has used it in the past. We ultimately ended up going with ZeroBounce based on the cost and documentation/resources available. Email validation tools are probably very similar, but ZeroBounce seemed the simplest for us, and we needed to implement one fast, so activation time was very quick.
