Protractor vs. Tricentis Tosca

It is a strong fit for end-to-end acceptance and regression testing inside the browser.

Incentivized

For projects having huge set of test cases to be automated can be accommodated by Tricentis Tosca with proper folder structure and best practices implementations. Tosca will be less appropriate for organizations where the number of automation scripts are limited with hardly any scope of increasing the script count or the cost of automation will be more than the cost of having manual resources as Tosca is a licensed tool.

Incentivized

• Async operations for browser-based validation tests. This kind of feature is a must-have for building tests to scale.

Incentivized

• Codeless - Easy to learn, Users can be trained quickly.
• Modular approach - Reusable test step blocks can be created and used across multiple test cases.
• Multiuser repository - Seamless collaboration between multiple team members in real-time.
• Supports high number of technologies.

Incentivized

• It would be great to see the Protractor API implemented successfully inside a non-Angular web application.

Incentivized

• Documentation - struggled multiple times with features not explained very well, or not explained at all
• The only support is on Tricentis Forums, where, sometimes, based on 'luck' - you will open a support case, and wait few days until you get the chance to speak with someone from Tricentis and show case your issue

Incentivized

We aim to renew Tosca for our organization. What we lose in license cost is gained by having employee that do not need programming background. We also recoup a lot of the cost on the rapidity of automation. Only the support we might not use as much. I believe Tosca is here to stay at our organization

Incentivized

It can be a challenge for new users who have never used an automation tool. For example, it is hard to understand the layout of the screen and where to find how to update the data. The interface can be overwhelming at first.

Incentivized

Tricentis team was very supportive. Support is expensive but they helped us at many level. Setting up timeline, implementation, precise questions on automation challenges. We had an account manager and technical people we could as to talk to. Support was generally timely and helping. They often proposed to come on site to help us which would cost more but could be helpful

Incentivized

Cypress.io is an alternative end-to-end test framework that does NOT use Selenium. Since I've only evaluated this tool as a possible solution, my estimation of its performance against Protractor is incomplete. However, if you and your team are looking for automation solutions outside of the Selenium scope, then Cypress.io may be a good fit given the problems you're trying to solve.

Incentivized

Tricentis Tosca is codeless and therefore easier to use. It's a great tool for people that would start doing automation and have no coding background. It seems like it has the same capabilities as other test automation suites but I felt it lacked a bit of capabilities on the test management suite such as defects test suites organizations etc

Incentivized

• Increased the number of reliable end to end tests inside my test suites.
• Decreased the number and frequency of false-positive test runs/results.

Incentivized

• It really had a very good impact on our ROI. We were able to automate most of the apps and layers with in it and get a very short execution time which led to increased releases with in short span of time.
• Time to market really improved and efficiency of developing scripts was not too bad.
• With built in test dashboards, it was easy to pull metrics and share the insights with management.

Incentivized