Independently Invited by TrustRadius
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
PyCharm | Score9.3 out of 10 | N/A | PyCharm is an extensive Integrated Development Environment (IDE) for Python developers. Its arsenal includes intelligent code completion, error detection, and rapid problem-solving features, all of which aim to bolster efficiency. The product supports programmers in composing orderly and maintainable code by offering PEP8 checks, testing assistance, intelligent refactorings, and inspections. Moreover, it caters to web development frameworks like Django and Flask by providing framework… | $9.90 per month per user |
Spyder | Score9 out of 10 | N/A | Spyder is a free and open source scientific environment for Python. It combines advanced editing, analysis, debugging, and profiling, with data exploration, interactive execution, deep inspection, and visualization capabilities. Spyder is sponsored by open source supporters QuanSight, and NumFOCUS, as well as individual donors. | $0 per month |
| PyCharm | Spyder | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
| No answers on this topic | ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| PyCharm | Spyder | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | ||
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
96% Would buy again 23 Answers | 100% Would buy again 8 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
96% Delivers good value for the price 22 Answers | 100% Delivers good value for the price 8 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
96% Happy with the feature set 23 Answers | 88% Happy with the feature set 7 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 16 Answers | 86% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
100% Implementation went as expected 23 Answers | 100% Implementation went as expected 8 Answers | |
| PyCharm | Spyder | |
|---|---|---|
| Highlights |
| |
| PyCharm | Spyder | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Visual Studio Score8.8 out of 10 | Visual Studio Score8.8 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | IntelliJ IDEA Score9.2 out of 10 | PyCharm Score9.3 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | WebStorm Score9.6 out of 10 | WebStorm Score9.6 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| PyCharm | Spyder | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 9.6 | 8.7 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 10.0 | - |
| Usability | 9.6 | 8.0 |
| Support Rating | 8.3 | 8.0 |
| PyCharm | Spyder | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
| No answers on this topic |
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots |