Quip vs. Workamajig

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Quip
Score 8.3 out of 10
N/A
Quip is a collaboration tool, from Salesforce, that helps sales teams accelerate business in real-time with embedded documents, live Salesforce data, and other built-in collaboration features.
$120
per year per user
Workamajig
Score 7.3 out of 10
N/A
Workamajig is a project management system with capabilities such as file sharing, resource management, and revenue projection.
$41
per month per user
Pricing
QuipWorkamajig
Editions & Modules
Enterprise
$25
per user per month
Starter
$120
per year per user
Plus
$300
per year per user
Advanced
$1,200
per year per user
In-house
$41
per month per user
Agency
$41
per month per user
Enterprise
Contact
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
QuipWorkamajig
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional DetailsAll editions include unlimited personal documents and folders and a custom subdomain. Paid versions include unlimited document revision history, message archive and group sharing.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
QuipWorkamajig
Features
QuipWorkamajig
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Product A and Product B
Quip
8.1
37 Ratings
4% above category average
Workamajig
4.9
13 Ratings
45% below category average
Task Management8.535 Ratings8.013 Ratings
Gantt Charts8.121 Ratings6.16 Ratings
Scheduling7.524 Ratings5.011 Ratings
Workflow Automation7.622 Ratings4.011 Ratings
Mobile Access7.632 Ratings1.08 Ratings
Search9.534 Ratings00 Ratings
Visual planning tools8.127 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management00 Ratings5.513 Ratings
Team Collaboration00 Ratings5.013 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology00 Ratings3.07 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology00 Ratings3.07 Ratings
Document Management00 Ratings4.013 Ratings
Email integration00 Ratings5.510 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking00 Ratings8.011 Ratings
Change request and Case Management00 Ratings4.08 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management00 Ratings7.010 Ratings
Communication
Comparison of Communication features of Product A and Product B
Quip
7.8
37 Ratings
3% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Chat7.536 Ratings00 Ratings
Notifications8.535 Ratings00 Ratings
Discussions8.536 Ratings00 Ratings
Surveys7.121 Ratings00 Ratings
Internal knowledgebase9.526 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with GoToMeeting6.110 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Gmail and Google Hangouts6.112 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Outlook9.011 Ratings00 Ratings
File Sharing & Management
Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Product A and Product B
Quip
7.8
37 Ratings
3% below category average
Workamajig
-
Ratings
Versioning7.627 Ratings00 Ratings
Video files7.120 Ratings00 Ratings
Audio files7.618 Ratings00 Ratings
Document collaboration9.537 Ratings00 Ratings
Access control8.132 Ratings00 Ratings
Advanced security features8.121 Ratings00 Ratings
Integrates with Google Drive6.116 Ratings00 Ratings
Device sync8.527 Ratings00 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of Product A and Product B
Quip
-
Ratings
Workamajig
6.7
10 Ratings
14% below category average
Quotes/estimates00 Ratings7.07 Ratings
Invoicing00 Ratings7.97 Ratings
Project & financial reporting00 Ratings6.010 Ratings
Integration with accounting software00 Ratings6.03 Ratings
Best Alternatives
QuipWorkamajig
Small Businesses
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Stackby
Stackby
Score 8.9 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Troop Messenger
Troop Messenger
Score 9.8 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
HCL Connections
HCL Connections
Score 9.0 out of 10
InEight
InEight
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
QuipWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
8.7
(38 ratings)
6.0
(13 ratings)
Usability
8.7
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
9.1
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
QuipWorkamajig
Likelihood to Recommend
Salesforce
I think collaboration is probably the best use case for it allows really good drafts of documents. I think it's really good use case if you want to go track edits to documents as well. It's probably not really good for versioning control, but it's definitely, it's very, very lightweight and so you can use it on a mobile device, you can use it in any web browser. So it's very easy to use, very easily accessible. I probably wouldn't use it from a spreadsheet perspective. Well I think some of the primary functions of data sheets are there. It doesn't have some of the more complex formulas that you would typically get from Excel or something like that
Read full review
Workamajig
If you're looking for a system to help you address accounting that's not suited for marketing agency structures, this is the right tool. It is a bit cumbersome, but it has streamlined our reporting, billing, estimating, and tracking. As for project management, it's great that it integrates with the estimating and finances, but it's just not enjoyable to use. The interface is clunky. So if project management is your main criteria, I'd choose something else. We would never use it to collaborate with clients either because I'd be afraid of making them frustrated by the tool, so we use Basecamp to do that.
Read full review
Pros
Salesforce
  • We use it as an effective way of collaboration between teams.
  • It can be used as an online spreadsheet.
  • It helps in accessing the data by multiple teams hassle-free.
  • Can customize the action like editing or locking the spreadsheet to the other users based on the business need.
Read full review
Workamajig
  • The Platinum version has a particularly robust time tracking system, down to a 'timer' function that can be critical for an agency like mine where you want to be accountable for billing a client arruately
  • The ability to make projects available only to those who are permitted to assign their time to it has apparently been very helpful during our revenue reconciliation meetings where time incurred is reviewed against scope
  • The mobile app, while I still feel needs some work, is pretty handy for a quick calendar check if I'm in a client meeting and cannot utilize my browser to get information
Read full review
Cons
Salesforce
  • When using Quip Desktop, it can be slow to update with content from other users
  • I think it would be cool to have a PDF proofing system integrated into Quip. Once copy has gone to design, we are basically done using Quip - I'd like to bring that all together within Quip
  • Multi -select and group export of documents would be helpful
Read full review
Workamajig
  • WMJ's interface is dated. Despite an html5 driven "sheets"-based interface, it takes a lot of time and effort to manage the interface, which could be streamlined considerably. On a UX/UI scale of 1 to 10, with 10 being the best, WMJ would earn a 6 from me.
  • Despite the amount of documentation available, there is a distinct lack of clarity in that documentation, and it doesn't fully cover everything you would expect. Branching thoughts, for instance, are not addressed. Additionally, because there are two editions of the software online, there are two support sites that aren't sequestered. So information from both commingles, creating confusion.
  • Support is available on an email and phone basis. They strongly encourage you to use email, however, and they are resistant to phone time. This is likely because the support staff is limited in number, but has a great depth of knowledge. If you want immediate phone support, however, YOU ARE OUT OF LUCK. You are placed in a queue and the odds of same-day help are low. For email, the response is usually within an hour, but when you are stuck with a configuration issue, or need to generate a report and don't know how to do something, waiting is not optimal. That said, the support team is TERRIFIC.
Read full review
Usability
Salesforce
It is the best collaboration tool in my company. Through it, the organization has achieved better connectivity and efficiency in its communication. Primarily, the docs feature of this software is the most utilized in the company. Slowly, dash-boarding and project management features have also been utilized. Generally, it is the best tool, very easy and fairly streamlined
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Salesforce
I have never used Quip's support. To be fair, we hired someone who used to work for Quip before working at our company, and he implemented it and pushed it with the team. He was very biased toward the product, and yes it was better than Google Drive, but by how much?
Read full review
Workamajig
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Salesforce
Google Drive is an obvious choice for a collaboration suite, but it still has this old-fashioned Windows 95 feel to it, with the standard file system hierarchy and spread-sheet like lists of files. Quip has a fresh take on the user interface, and the comments and discussion on a given file or line within a file seems more integrated and seamless, rather than a bunch of boxes out in the margin away from where you're actually reading and working. Having everything just to the left of a list or paragraph makes it easier to focus and maintain context while you're working or discussing a certain point.
Read full review
Workamajig
Workamajig was selected over a decade ago when there were very few project management platforms that has integrations with other platforms, support for Agile, KanBan, etc etc. Most of the other offerings did not offer the type of security available with us hosting an on premises server behind a VPN although now there are plenty of cloud based solutions that have security compliance greater than what we can provide (fedRamp, etc.)
Read full review
Return on Investment
Salesforce
  • It is a tool that allows work teams to move forward in a centralized way and meet their objectives as efficiently as possible; this has allowed us to meet our customers and brought more work to the organization, therefore more revenue; I would say that the ROI was fast enough, as expected.
Read full review
Workamajig
  • The agency switched to an hourly allocation so our clients were subject to a certain amount of hours each quarter. JIG helped us keep track of who was going over hours or who had some to spare. Once the clients went over we would use JIG to help charge the additional fees for going over. It helped keep clients accountable.
  • It was used to keep track of time sheets and through those time sheets, the directors were able to make a case for more employees on certain accounts. The corporate team hired 3 additional people that were truly needed and our time sheets helped reflect that.
Read full review
ScreenShots

Quip Screenshots

Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of Screenshot of