Ranorex vs. Progress Telerik
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Ranorex | Score8 out of 10 | N/A | Over 14,000+ users worldwide automate tests with Ranorex Studio, which promises to enable rapid delivery of high-quality desktop, mobile, and web applications. The vendor says that with over 10 years in test automation, Ranorex Studio supports automating functional UI tests for even the most challenging technologies, from legacy applications to the latest web and mobile platforms. Ranorex Studio is an all-in-one tool that empowers everyone on the team. Key benefits and… | $890 per additional endpoint |
Progress Telerik | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web | $999 per developer, royalty-free |
| Ranorex | Progress Telerik | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | Optional | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | All licenses are perpetual and include 12 months of maintenance and email support. A runtime floating license requires at least one premium license for test creation. Please contact our sales team for information about possible volume discounts and options for enterprise support. Consulting, integration and training services are available from our partners worldwide. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Ranorex | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Would buy again 28 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 23 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| Ranorex | Progress Telerik | |||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Test Management |
| |||||||||||||||||||
| Ranorex | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | No answers on this topic | Syncfusion Essential Studio Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | No answers on this topic | D3.js Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Progress Kendo UI Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Ranorex | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 1.0 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 6.0 | 9.3 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Ranorex | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Ranorex Screenshots | Progress Telerik Screenshots |









