Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform vs. Spiceworks Help Desk

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Ansible
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
The Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform (acquired by Red Hat in 2015) is a foundation for building and operating automation across an organization. The platform includes tools needed to implement enterprise-wide automation, and can automate resource provisioning, and IT environments and configuration of systems and devices. It can be used in a CI/CD process to provision the target environment and to then deploy the application on it.
$5,000
per year
Spiceworks Help Desk
Score 7.7 out of 10
N/A
Spiceworks offers a set of free tools for IT network management and help desk support ticketing. The inventory management system essentially provides comprehensive device information for asset management. The Spiceworks Network Monitor provides information on observed IT for problem tracking and server performance monitoring. And finally, the Spiceworks Help Desk Software lets IT personnel stay on top of issues across the network with a ticketing system. Help desk roles with role-based…N/A
Pricing
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSpiceworks Help Desk
Editions & Modules
Basic Tower
5,000
per year
Enterprise Tower
10,000
per year
Premium Tower
14,000
per year
All Tiers
Free
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
AnsibleSpiceworks Help Desk
Free Trial
NoNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
Additional Details
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSpiceworks Help Desk
Features
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSpiceworks Help Desk
Configuration Management
Comparison of Configuration Management features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
8.6
44 Ratings
7% above category average
Spiceworks Help Desk
-
Ratings
Infrastructure Automation9.244 Ratings00 Ratings
Automated Provisioning8.841 Ratings00 Ratings
Parallel Execution8.840 Ratings00 Ratings
Node Management8.432 Ratings00 Ratings
Reporting & Logging7.841 Ratings00 Ratings
Version Control8.738 Ratings00 Ratings
Incident and problem management
Comparison of Incident and problem management features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Spiceworks Help Desk
8.4
55 Ratings
2% above category average
Organize and prioritize service tickets00 Ratings8.054 Ratings
Expert directory00 Ratings7.547 Ratings
Subscription-based notifications00 Ratings8.742 Ratings
ITSM collaboration and documentation00 Ratings6.245 Ratings
Ticket creation and submission00 Ratings10.054 Ratings
Ticket response00 Ratings10.053 Ratings
Self Help Community
Comparison of Self Help Community features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Spiceworks Help Desk
7.1
52 Ratings
12% below category average
External knowledge base00 Ratings7.548 Ratings
Internal knowledge base00 Ratings6.748 Ratings
Multi-Channel Help
Comparison of Multi-Channel Help features of Product A and Product B
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform
-
Ratings
Spiceworks Help Desk
8.0
52 Ratings
0% above category average
Customer portal00 Ratings8.246 Ratings
IVR00 Ratings6.211 Ratings
Social integration00 Ratings7.527 Ratings
Email support00 Ratings9.546 Ratings
Help Desk CRM integration00 Ratings8.728 Ratings
Best Alternatives
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSpiceworks Help Desk
Small Businesses
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.5 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.5 out of 10
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Agiloft Service Desk (discontinued)
Score 9.0 out of 10
Enterprises
HashiCorp Terraform
HashiCorp Terraform
Score 8.5 out of 10
SysAid
SysAid
Score 8.9 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSpiceworks Help Desk
Likelihood to Recommend
9.5
(108 ratings)
9.7
(83 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.1
(3 ratings)
10.0
(29 ratings)
Usability
7.3
(1 ratings)
9.0
(9 ratings)
Availability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(3 ratings)
Performance
8.7
(5 ratings)
8.0
(1 ratings)
Support Rating
7.3
(3 ratings)
8.7
(26 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(1 ratings)
10.0
(7 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.6
(5 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
-
(0 ratings)
10.0
(1 ratings)
User Testimonials
Red Hat Ansible Automation PlatformSpiceworks Help Desk
Likelihood to Recommend
Red Hat
It has helped save us so much time, as it was designed to automate mundane and repetitive tasks that we were using other tools to perform and that required so much manual intervention. It does not work very well within Windows environments, understandably, but I would love to see more integration. I want it to be sexy and attractive to more than just geeky sysadmins.
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
It's a great helpdesk solution - we currently have five years of data within it, roughly 25,000 tickets. The older edition is a great inventory and software license tracking tool. It is easy for users to use the interface and submit tickets and requests on the web, and its email integration is solid. The new version is a below-average system monitoring tool, only giving up/down status and a few other metrics.
Read full review
Pros
Red Hat
  • Debugging is easy, as it tells you exactly within your job where the job failed, even when jumping around several playbooks.
  • Ansible seems to integrate with everything, and the community is big enough that if you are unsure how to approach converting a process into a playbook, you can usually find something similar to what you are trying to do.
  • Security in AAP seems to be pretty straightforward. Easy to organize and identify who has what permissions or can only see the content based on the organization they belong to.
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
  • It helps to multitask, even on the go with the mobile App.
  • We can customize to meet your needs with automated responses, notifications, and templates.
  • Detailed reports allow managers to keep track [of] and analyze data.
  • Allows for a database to store notes helpful for future tickets.
Read full review
Cons
Red Hat
  • YAML is hard for many to adopt. Moving to a system that is not as white space sensitive would likely increase uptake.
  • AAP and EDA should be more closely aligned. There are differences that can trip users of the integration up. An example would be the way that variables are used.
  • Event-driven Ansible output is not as informative as AAP.
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
  • I have always wanted a way to redirect a support request into another IS bin, such as a development task.
  • It's possible to extract the data from the Spiceworks database, but it would be helpful if the process to do so were easier.
  • Improved ability to customize the system generated emails to improve the formatting and company branding.
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
Red Hat
Even is if it's a great tool, we are looking to renew our licence for our production servers only. The product is very expensive to use, so we might look for a cheaper solution for our non-production servers. One of the solution we are looking, is AWX, free, and similar to AAP. This is be perfect for our non-production servers.
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
Spiceworks is a free tool, so there would be no hesitation if we are required to upgrade it. We have installed Spiceworks on a dedicated server with more than enough resources to get the most from this tool, so we will have this running in our department for years to come.
Read full review
Usability
Red Hat
the yaml is easy to write and most people can be taught to write basic playbooks in a few weeks
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
Spiceworks is user friendly and easy to set up. It can be customized to suit your needs. If there are any problems, you can go to the community forums for support and be in contact with many IT Pros, as well as the Spiceworks support staff and development teams who are always happy to help users out
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
Red Hat
No answers on this topic
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
We use it both locally on our own server so up time is decided by us and we also use the hosted help desk. We have never had an outage of that.
Read full review
Performance
Red Hat
Great in almost every way compared to any other configuration management software. The only thing I wish for is python3 support. Other than that, YAML is much improved compared to the Ruby of Chef. The agentless nature is incredibly convenient for managing systems quickly, and if a member of your term has no terminal experience whatsoever they can still use the UI.
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
Red Hat
There is a lot of good documentation that Ansible and Red Hat provide which should help get someone started with making Ansible useful. But once you get to more complicated scenarios, you will benefit from learning from others. I have not used Red Hat support for work with Ansible, but many of the online resources are helpful.
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
Spiceworks has been working out of the box, and some of the basic customizations have been successful with just our internal staff handling. We don't have any other issues with the tool. It provides us with the inventory information we want in a quick and concise report in a variety of formats for our team.
Read full review
Implementation Rating
Red Hat
I spoke on this topic today!
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
If you can spin up a VM to run it on, you'll thank yourself later. If you have remote sites, set up a local server (or dedicated computer) at each site and set them up as remote collectors for the main site. You'll save time and bandwidth
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
Red Hat
I haven't thought of any right now other than just doing our own home-brewed shell scripts. Command line scripts. And how does this compare? It's light years ahead, especially with the ability to share credentials without giving the person the actual credentials. You can delegate that within, I guess what used to be called Ansible Tower, which is now the Ansible Automation platform. It lets you share, I can give you the keys without you being able to see the keys. It's great
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
EGroupware UI is clunky and hard to use, Jira is great but the pricing is expensive in comparison with spice works that has a free version and you can test it out properly before buying and make a correct decision based on your business plan and company objectives with the right software.
Read full review
Return on Investment
Red Hat
  • Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform offers automation and ML tools that allow me to automate complex IT tasks.
  • Through automation analytics, it is seamless to gain full visibility into automation performance allowing me to make informed decisions.
  • Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform allows me to move rapidly from insights to action.
  • Creating and sharing automation content in one place unify a team in one place hence enhancing real-time collaboration.
Read full review
Spiceworks Ziff Davis
  • Positive - Allow organizations to implement structured Help Desk procedures.
  • Positive - IT can begin to quantify their tickets and uncover needs within the organization.
  • Positive - IT can develop a solid roadmap with [the] management of future needs, equipment refresh schedules, etc.
  • Positive - IT can pinpoint employees who may need extra training or updated equipment based on historical ticketing data.
Read full review
ScreenShots