ResultsBI (formerly RESULTS.com) offers a cloud-based objectives and key results (OKR) software built around foundational features such as key performance indicator dashboards, project and task management functionality, and collaboration tools.
N/A
Sage HRMS
Score9.8 out of 10
N/A
Sage HRMS is an HR management solution that integrates payroll, benefits, recruiting, employee self-service, and analytics capabilities.
N/A
Pricing
ResultsBI
Sage HRMS
Editions & Modules
No answers on this topic
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
ResultsBI
Sage HRMS
Free Trial
No
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
Yes
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
—
More Pricing Information
Features
ResultsBI
Sage HRMS
Human Resource Management
Comparison of Human Resource Management features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
5.5
9 Ratings
39% below category average
Employee demographic data
00 Ratings
8.08 Ratings
Employment history
00 Ratings
8.09 Ratings
Job profiles and administration
00 Ratings
1.39 Ratings
Workflow for transfers, promotions, pay raises, etc.
00 Ratings
7.99 Ratings
Organizational charting
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
Organization and location management
00 Ratings
6.06 Ratings
Compliance data (COBRA, OSHA, etc.)
00 Ratings
1.27 Ratings
Payroll Management
Comparison of Payroll Management features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
4.8
7 Ratings
52% below category average
Pay calculation
00 Ratings
6.17 Ratings
Support for external payroll vendors
00 Ratings
4.04 Ratings
Off-cycle/On-Demand payment
00 Ratings
6.92 Ratings
Benefit plan administration
00 Ratings
2.16 Ratings
Direct deposit files
00 Ratings
8.07 Ratings
Salary revision and increment management
00 Ratings
3.06 Ratings
Reimbursement management
00 Ratings
3.27 Ratings
Leave and Attendance Management
Comparison of Leave and Attendance Management features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
1.2
7 Ratings
149% below category average
Approval workflow
00 Ratings
1.26 Ratings
Balance details
00 Ratings
1.27 Ratings
Annual carry-forward and encashment
00 Ratings
1.06 Ratings
Employee Self Service
Comparison of Employee Self Service features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
3.9
8 Ratings
72% below category average
View and generate pay and benefit information
00 Ratings
4.18 Ratings
Update personal information
00 Ratings
4.27 Ratings
View company policy documentation
00 Ratings
1.16 Ratings
Employee recognition
00 Ratings
6.04 Ratings
View job history
00 Ratings
4.05 Ratings
Asset Management
Comparison of Asset Management features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.0
2 Ratings
14% below category average
Tracking of all physical assets
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
HR Reporting
Comparison of HR Reporting features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
3.7
8 Ratings
69% below category average
Report builder
00 Ratings
2.07 Ratings
Pre-built reports
00 Ratings
1.28 Ratings
Ability to combine HR data with external data
00 Ratings
8.06 Ratings
Onboarding
Comparison of Onboarding features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.0
4 Ratings
14% below category average
New hire portal
00 Ratings
7.04 Ratings
Manager tracking tools
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Performance and Goals
Comparison of Performance and Goals features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.3
2 Ratings
10% below category average
Corporate goal setting
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Individual goal setting
00 Ratings
7.02 Ratings
Line-of sight-visibility
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Performance tracking
00 Ratings
6.02 Ratings
Performance Management
Comparison of Performance Management features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
7.8
5 Ratings
2% below category average
Performance plans
00 Ratings
9.03 Ratings
Performance improvement plans
00 Ratings
8.03 Ratings
Review status tracking
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Review reminders
00 Ratings
8.04 Ratings
Multiple review frequency
00 Ratings
7.03 Ratings
Succession Planning
Comparison of Succession Planning features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Feature
ResultsBI
-
Ratings
Sage HRMS
8.5
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Create succession plans/pools
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Candidate ranking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate search
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Candidate development
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Recruiting / ATS
Comparison of Recruiting / ATS features of ResultsBI and Sage HRMS
Results.com would be a fantastic platform for a distributed team that has its data stored in a simple/single/common method and is looking for a single visual platform around which the culture of the company can collaborate, see relevant company metrics (and each other's metrics), and discuss the same. RESULTS.com is likely unnecessary for any team that is physically located together within an office and who can physically meet together. Such a scenario likely already has wall-projected charts and physically posted information. Further, we found RESULTS.com to be a bad choice for a company that has its data in several different locations, requiring the integration of several different APIs all coordinated together. Our somewhat complicated/disparate data simply didn't work well in the system to the point where people eventually were conditioned to NOT believe the numbers shown in RESULTS.com.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage HRMS is a software that fits in all organizations whether small or large and this makes it the most suitable HR solution as it will help you manage your workforce even if it may appear small. The software has analytics and reporting tools that are applicable in performance management where you will use them in assessing the productivity of your employees and plan on how to improve further as a workforce. It further helps in employee on-boarding, payroll management, and talent management
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
It has a very nice graphical/visual display of metrics/KPIs that are fed into it.
It has a fantastic meetings agenda and communication module that helped better connect our geographically distributed offices.
It solved the problem we had of using several different platforms for each need - providing a central place for results-orientated information sharing and discussion.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Like all BI software, the pretty graphics and charts and information are only as accurate as what is put into the system. It does not have parameters that will flag suspect data, which became a problem as our data sources increased and the results.com integration required more and more results.com-side development.
The promise of having the corporate mission/vision/values/etc. all connected to individual priorities and associated KPIs never came to pass. Being early adopters, we purchased partly on the promises of salespeople. As time marched on, support and development dropped off in favor of increasing their sales department.
We believe, through our experience with results.com, that the company was built to sell quickly. That is, we believe the owner/s blasted through their funding in the first year to onboard as many users as possible so they could increase value for a quick sale. Then we believe that when the money was mostly spent, and there was no sale, the company had to become a normal, profitable, long-term business which led to expense cutting, a RIF of developers and customer support, and the resulting slowdown/stoppage/inability to develop and support the product. Our feeling in the last months on the platform was one where it seemed the employees/owners were unhappy and disgruntled to have to actually run it as a business and deal with customers. (This is our guess and belief based on what we saw over time and without any knowledge whatsoever on what was actually happening over there.)
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I do not work with this software anymore, and I am not involved with the renewal of it. However, if I were, I would still suggest using it unless something better was introduced
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
When it worked, it worked nicely. Unfortunately, it didn't work for us all the time - and less so as the months went on. So, although relatively "easy to use," it stopped providing value due to its data integration problems. Thus, when the data was incorrect, people stopped using it.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
This is a solid 5 because the first year we had fantastic customer support. We had a comprehensive training, a (seemingly) dedicated support staffer, a fair amount of development help to integrate things, and consultations with people associated with RESULTS.com who have made a name for themselves in this general method of business operations. But, after the first year that mostly dried up. It was a 10 the first year, and a 1 the next years - averaging to a 5.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We have examined a variety of similar products both before, during, and after our time with results.com. We are currently using Sisense which is an entirely higher level than results.com in terms of B.I. - not only in the drill-down type of data access and reporting but certainly in its ability to handle multiple data sources effectively.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Sage HRMS was very cost effective for a non-profit. It does all that we needed as a company and more. It also allows us to handle payroll ourselves instead of outsourcing [it].
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We did not utilize a BI dashboard nor a standardized meeting agenda system before results.com so in that respect, it helped us establish a results/performance-orientated culture which was badly needed.
Unfortunately, beyond that first year, results.com didn't keep up with our struggles with data imports. That, combined with the inability for us to see direct ROI $ increases, led us to eventually leave the platform. Unfortunately, they locked us into a longer term (even without providing promised services) and so we technically were on the system (but not using it) for 6+ months past the date where we'd all agreed it was not useful for anyone anymore.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info