SAP NetWeaver BPM vs. Progress Telerik
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
SAP BPM | Score7 out of 10 | N/A | SAP NetWeaver Business Process Management is a business process management offering and application infrastructure. It supports joint modeling of processes, central process execution via a Java-based engine, provision of interfaces for users, and integration of business rules into processes. | N/A |
Progress Telerik | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web | $999 per developer, royalty-free |
| SAP BPM | Progress Telerik | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules | No answers on this topic |
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | — | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| SAP BPM | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Would buy again 28 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 23 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| SAP BPM | Progress Telerik | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Reporting & Analytics |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Process Engine |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Collaboration |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Content Management Capabilties |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| SAP BPM | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | Process Street Score8.2 out of 10 | Syncfusion Essential Studio Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | TIBCO® BPM Enterprise Score8 out of 10 | D3.js Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | IBM Business Automation Workflow Score10 out of 10 | Progress Kendo UI Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| SAP BPM | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | 7.0 | 10.0 |
| Usability | - | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | 5.0 | 9.3 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| SAP BPM | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew |
|
|
| Usability | No answers on this topic |
|
| Support Rating |
|
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Progress Telerik Screenshots |








