SEOTesting.com is an online SEO research tool used to grow search traffic through testing & experimentation.
$50
per month
TextCortex
Score10 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
TextCortex is an Enterprise AI Infrastructure and Model-Agnostic platform designed to govern and scale generative AI across organizational workflows. The solution provides a unified interface for accessing multiple Large Language Models (LLMs)—including GPT-4, Claude 3, and Llama 3—while enabling context-aware automation through internal Knowledge Bases.
SEOTesting.com is great in monitoring the results of implemented SEO optimisations. SEOTesting.com also has extensive content analysis reports that make it really easy to find long hanging fruits for content optimisation. However, I would not recommend SEOTesting.com for rank tracking and it has no tools for technical SEO. But if you pair SEOTesting.com with some other SEO tools of your preference, you get a really valuable toolset with decent pricing.
This tool has been very helpful for our organization, it allows you to create better descriptions for your reports and projects, you can create better writing for your blog and social networks, which allows you to create marketing for your entire organization, with which you can increase your sales and attract better customers, it has exceptional search engines so that you can integrate your text with keywords that help you increase traffic on your website. This platform has been very useful and is appropriate for all organizations.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
SEOTesting.com is NOT all-in-one SEO tool. But what it does, it does really well.
Rank Tracking requires to fill landing page per keyword. That doesn't make sense as the desired landing page is not always the best ranking landing page for each keyword.
Dashboards timelines should have some options to select only the desired timeframe. Then it would be sometimes easier to look at only the last two months for example.
The account person is quick to respond, though issues reported required support of other teams with no SLA. The data is easily comprehensible and the platform is incredibly versatile. Sometimes scanning problems take weeks to diagnose and fix. The learning curve for SEOTesting.com is minimal
SEOTesting.com is a very specific, focused too. It's not "better than" the other tools. It does something they don't do well: gets data from your SEO results out into an easily-read, easily-reported format so you can 1. learn from what's working and what's not 2. show your team what success & failure look like 3. demonstrate to your boss/client the short-run benefits of investing in SEO Search Console has all the data in it. In fact, SEOTesting.com gets its data from Search Console. But you are going to waste your time and your colleagues time if you try to monitor granular, week-by-week progress for different pages in Search Console. SEOTesting is awesome at that. Use Ahrefs and/or Semrush to get ideas on how to improve your website's content and tech SEO. Then make the changes. Then use SEOTesting.com to find out if it worked!
This platform has had a very positive impact on our organization because we have been able to implement it from anywhere, this tool can be installed easily, you can create unlimited texts in the business version, there is not a number of descriptions generated per day, your organization can do as many as it wants.
allows you to manually write texts that you can implement with your organization, created with a natural language.
This tool has an exceptionally basic plan for a price of only $ 19 per month, I recommend it for small companies.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
