Sitetracker vs WorkflowMax

• It delivers real-time collaboration which helps projects
• The product is revolutionizing the project

Read full review

• Allows for fairly simple or elaborate project forecasting depending on the complexity of the job. This allows us to track time by a single project or multiple phases.
• Time keeping and coordination with invoicing software has increased our firm's ability to issue timely and accurate invoices to clients. Has ability to break down projects in numerous ways to meet the needs of our various clients. This means we can invoice by project, phase, milestone, or dollar increments.
• Interface is clean and easy to follow. The easier it is to use the fewer mistakes that are made when entering information. This is greatly appreciated.

Read full review

• Actually there is issues with the startup challenges
• No transparency

Read full review

• When looking at the job distribution it isn't to scale and it isn't printable.
• Sometimes it is confusing as to where you might find something until you realise there are multiple points of access.
• When a job is assigned the whole task is assigned and if you work on it before the task is allocated to you, it isn't possible to enter those hours. It would be better if the employee could choose the task they did and enter the hours and then it sent back to an approver to have it added.

Read full review

• Data-driven
• Enable performance management
• Identify hidden costs

Read full review

• Biggest impact has been automation of client invoicing. Prior to using WorkflowMax, invoices were generated in Word, usually a template from a prior invoice to that client. Now the invoice is generated in WorkflowMax, saved as a draft, exported to Word, uploaded to Microsoft SharePoint, then shared with the invoice author. This has cut down on mistakes and unnecessary admin time.

Read full review