Softr vs. Progress Telerik
| Product | Rating | Most Used By | Product Summary | Starting Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Softr | Score8.2 out of 10 | N/A | Softr is a cloud-based No-Code Development platform for creating internal tools and business portals through a visual application builder. Teams can combine native databases, workflow automation, integrations, hosting, and granular access controls to create and maintain applications without writing code. Softr also functions as an Application Platform by providing the environment and tools required to configure and deploy those applications. Key… | $25 per month |
Progress Telerik | Score9.4 out of 10 | N/A | With Telerik UI libraries, Progress aims to equip .NET ninjas with a full arsenal of weapons, helping to create beautiful, modern and future-proof applications quickly and intuitively. The vendor states that with its over 1,250 UI components for all .NET platforms, as well as various themes, skins and customization options, Telerik users report cutting development time by up to 50 percent. Web | $999 per developer, royalty-free |
| Softr | Progress Telerik | |||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Editions & Modules |
|
| ||||||||||||||
| Offerings |
| |||||||||||||||
| Entry-level Setup Fee | No setup fee | No setup fee | ||||||||||||||
| Additional Details | Discounts available for annual pricing (approximately 2 months free). AI credits included in the base plan reset each month, and unused credits don't roll over. | — | ||||||||||||||
| More Pricing Information | ||||||||||||||||
| Softr | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Considered Both Products | No answer on this topic | No answer on this topic |
| Key User Insights | ||
| Would buy again | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Would buy again 28 Answers | |
| Delivers good value for the price | ||
No answers on this topic | 92% Delivers good value for the price 24 Answers | |
| Happy with the feature set | ||
No answers on this topic | 97% Happy with the feature set 28 Answers | |
| Lived up to sales and marketing promises | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 23 Answers | |
| Implementation went as expected | ||
No answers on this topic | 96% Implementation went as expected 26 Answers | |
| Softr | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Small Businesses | NativeScript Score4.8 out of 10 | Syncfusion Essential Studio Score7.3 out of 10 |
| Medium-sized Companies | SAP Extension Suite (discontinued) Score8.4 out of 10 | D3.js Score8.9 out of 10 |
| Enterprises | No answers on this topic | Progress Kendo UI Score8 out of 10 |
| All Alternatives | View all alternatives | View all alternatives |
| Softr | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend | 10.0 | 9.3 |
| Likelihood to Renew | - | 10.0 |
| Usability | 10.0 | 9.0 |
| Support Rating | - | 9.3 |
| Implementation Rating | - | 9.0 |
| Softr | Progress Telerik | |
|---|---|---|
| Likelihood to Recommend |
|
|
| Pros |
|
|
| Cons |
|
|
| Likelihood to Renew | No answers on this topic |
|
| Usability |
|
|
| Support Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Implementation Rating | No answers on this topic |
|
| Alternatives Considered |
|
|
| Return on Investment |
|
|
| ScreenShots | Softr Screenshots | Progress Telerik Screenshots |










