Solutions2Share Teams Manager vs. VendorSage

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
Teams Manager
Score 8.0 out of 10
Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)
IT administrators can keep control of their Microsoft 365 environment with Teams Manager. Teams Manager is used to prevent the uncontrolled creation of Teams and Groups and automate governance processes. Key Features: • Governance Dashboard and Reports – provides an overview of the M365 environment (inactive or ownerless teams, teams with guests etc.) • Provisioning of new teams & SharePoint sites – with channels,…
$1.60
per year per user
VendorSage
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
VendorSage centralizes an organization's SaaS stack in one place to make buying, managing and adopting software simpler. The SaaS management and SaaS procurement platform and services help Finance and IT teams get better visibility and save on their SaaS spend. VendorSage continuously looks for ways to optimise the user's SaaS spend, whether its negotiating the best rates or identifying duplicate functionality in the company's stack. Beyond spend, VendorSage helps…
$10
per month
Pricing
Solutions2Share Teams ManagerVendorSage
Editions & Modules
Extra Large (4,000+ users)
$1.60
per year per user
Small (up to 249 users)
1,599
per year per installation
Medium (up to 999 users)
4,049
per year per installation
Large (up to 4000 users)
6,499
per year per installation
Individual
$10
per month
Team
$150
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Teams ManagerVendorSage
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional DetailsPrices are starting prices. Not listed here are the different support and service packages as well as the bundle discount you will receive when opting for both Teams Manager and External User Manager.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Solutions2Share Teams ManagerVendorSage
Considered Both Products
Teams Manager
Chose Teams Manager
Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for …
Chose Teams Manager
As skype for business was getting outdated so we prefer Microsoft Teams over Skype.
Chose Teams Manager
Our general contractor for the build-out selected MT over Zoom. It was not our choice. Zoom has a bit more movement with background screen images and vid quality but it's all fairly close.
Chose Teams Manager
We still use it for our one-off situations, but mostly stick to Teams as it is much more user-friendly and allows better sharing capabilities through virtual meetings. Skype is not as easily customized, so it's a no-brainer to use Microsoft Teams and Team Manager for all of our …
Chose Teams Manager
As I mentioned before, we switched to Teams from Skype because it was more reliable. We did not experience interruptions in service especially for those departments working remote.
VendorSage

No answer on this topic

Best Alternatives
Solutions2Share Teams ManagerVendorSage
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies

No answers on this topic

Freshservice
Freshservice
Score 8.3 out of 10
Enterprises
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
SailPoint Identity Security Cloud
Score 8.1 out of 10
Freshservice
Freshservice
Score 8.3 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
Solutions2Share Teams ManagerVendorSage
Likelihood to Recommend
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
Solutions2Share Teams ManagerVendorSage
Likelihood to Recommend
For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • Manage channels - the level of detail of managing what channels are created and how they function is great.
  • Manage users - it's easy to manage owners of team sites, along with members and guests.
  • Analytics - being able to review how each team site and the channel is being used is extremely helpful and can point out areas of weakness or concern.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • The video conferencing feature could afford to me a little more user friendly.
  • Branding of Microsoft Teams over Skype Needs done.
  • Making calls through Teams has not been very successful.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for holding meetings with people outside of your organization.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • Being able to manage schedules through a platform we're already using has had a positive impact on ROI
  • Overall team success and happiness through Teams has been made possible by the management of the team site by the Team Manager (positive impact on ROI)
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

Teams Manager Screenshots

Screenshot of Governance Dashboard and Reports – for an overview of Microsoft 365 environmentsScreenshot of Automated request and approval process for new teams, M365 groups and SharePoint sitesScreenshot of Templates and provisioning for teams and SharePoint sites (with channels, tabs, apps, folders, Planner with tasks, OneNote with content and more)Screenshot of Lifecycles for teams: inactive or obsolete teams can automatically be archived or even deleted after a specified period of timeScreenshot of Naming conventions for teams, OneNotes, Planners and SharePoint URLs: rules for uniform, relevant names with predefined prefixes and suffixesScreenshot of Policy packages for teams: automatically enforce governance policies for team requests, approvals, access reviews and more