IT administrators can keep control of their Microsoft 365 environment with Teams Manager. Teams Manager is used to prevent the uncontrolled creation of Teams and Groups and automate governance processes. Key Features: • Governance Dashboard and Reports – provides an overview of the M365 environment (inactive or ownerless teams, teams with guests etc.) • Provisioning of new teams & SharePoint sites – with channels,…
$1.60
per year per user
VendorSage
Score 0.0 out of 10
N/A
VendorSage centralizes an organization's SaaS stack in one place to make buying, managing and adopting software simpler. The SaaS management and SaaS procurement platform and services help Finance and IT teams get better visibility and save on their SaaS spend. VendorSage continuously looks for ways to optimise the user's SaaS spend, whether its negotiating the best rates or identifying duplicate functionality in the company's stack. Beyond spend, VendorSage helps…
$10
per month
Pricing
Solutions2Share Teams Manager
VendorSage
Editions & Modules
Extra Large (4,000+ users)
$1.60
per year per user
Small (up to 249 users)
1,599
per year per installation
Medium (up to 999 users)
4,049
per year per installation
Large (up to 4000 users)
6,499
per year per installation
Individual
$10
per month
Team
$150
per month
Enterprise
Contact Sales
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Teams Manager
VendorSage
Free Trial
Yes
No
Free/Freemium Version
No
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
Optional
No setup fee
Additional Details
Prices are starting prices. Not listed here are the different support and service packages as well as the bundle discount you will receive when opting for both Teams Manager and External User Manager.
—
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
Solutions2Share Teams Manager
VendorSage
Considered Both Products
Teams Manager
Verified User
Anonymous
Chose Teams Manager
Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for …
Our general contractor for the build-out selected MT over Zoom. It was not our choice. Zoom has a bit more movement with background screen images and vid quality but it's all fairly close.
We still use it for our one-off situations, but mostly stick to Teams as it is much more user-friendly and allows better sharing capabilities through virtual meetings. Skype is not as easily customized, so it's a no-brainer to use Microsoft Teams and Team Manager for all of our …
As I mentioned before, we switched to Teams from Skype because it was more reliable. We did not experience interruptions in service especially for those departments working remote.
For different projects in a big organization different teams can be formed and thus their internal tasks assignments can be done there. It is easy to manage, assign tasks to people in a particular project. People or team leads in multiple projects can share different channels thus maintaining different projects. Users should be refrained of creating new teams just for fun purpose etc. to avoid to much chaos.
It is a well-designed and polished application on Teams. Most of its issues stem from Teams UI and UX, which could be improved further. However, if you can fit the team manager to your needs, it can become a very powerful tool to manage data flow.
Similar teams meeting management software with totally different functionality. It was used briefly in a one-off trial but was never implemented due to the dominance of Teams and Zoom. It's essential to use software that most people can access, or at least quickly obtain, for holding meetings with people outside of your organization.
Being able to manage schedules through a platform we're already using has had a positive impact on ROI
Overall team success and happiness through Teams has been made possible by the management of the team site by the Team Manager (positive impact on ROI)