Stack Overflow for Teams vs. XWiki

Stack Overflow for Teams

14 Reviews and Ratings

XWiki

4 Reviews and Ratings

Overview
Product	Rating	Most Used By	Product Summary	Starting Price
Stack Overflow for Teams	Score8.3 out of 10	N/A	Stack Overflow for Teams is a team knowledge management and Q & A platform for development billed per teammate, featuring roles and permissions, and integrations with popularly used collaboration tools.	$7 per month per teammate (up to 250 teammates)
XWiki	Score8.2 out of 10	Mid-Size Companies (51-1,000 employees)	XWiki is an open-source collaborative platform designed to enhance business collaboration and streamline knowledge management for companies of all sizes. As a an alternative to proprietary knowledge bases, XWiki offers a structured second-generation wiki with over 900 pre-made extensions, enabling businesses to add features and customize their XWiki instance to meet specific needs. Key features and benefits: Structured wiki concept: XWiki organizes knowledge…	$300 per year 10 users

Pricing

Stack Overflow for Teams

XWiki

Basic: $7
per month per teammate (up to 250 teammates)
Business: $14
per month per teammate (unlimited)
Enterprise: Custom

Starter: €300
per year for up to 10 users
On-Premise: Custom Pricing
(Pro Plans available for On-Premise deployment)
Basic: starting at €1443
per year for up to 25 users
Business: starting at €10890
per year for up to 250 users
Enterprise: starting at €33000
per year for up to 500 users

Pricing Offerings
Stack Overflow for Teams	XWiki
Free Trial
No	Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes	Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No	Yes

No setup fee

Optional

Discount available for annual pricing.

Discount available for multi-year pricing and higher user volumes. Up to a 50% discount available for NGOs and institutions of higher learning.

Community Pulse
Key User Insights
	Stack Overflow for Teams	XWiki
Considered Both Products	Stack Overflow No answer on this topic	XWiki SAS No answer on this topic
	Would buy again
	90% Would buy again 9 Answers	No answers on this topic
	Delivers good value for the price
	100% Delivers good value for the price 10 Answers	No answers on this topic
	Happy with the feature set
	90% Happy with the feature set 9 Answers	No answers on this topic
	Lived up to sales and marketing promises
	100% Lived up to sales and marketing promises 6 Answers	No answers on this topic
	Implementation went as expected
71% Implementation went as expected 5 Answers	No answers on this topic

Best Alternatives
	Stack Overflow for Teams	XWiki
Small Businesses	Slite Score5.8 out of 10	Slite Score5.8 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies	Bloomfire Score8.4 out of 10	Bloomfire Score8.4 out of 10
Enterprises	Bloomfire Score8.4 out of 10	Bloomfire Score8.4 out of 10
All Alternatives	View all alternatives	View all alternatives

User Ratings
	Stack Overflow for Teams	XWiki
Likelihood to Recommend	9.0 (10 ratings)	10.0 (1 ratings)

User Testimonials
	Stack Overflow for Teams	XWiki
Likelihood to Recommend	Stack Overflow In my opinion, Stack Overflow for Teams is well suited for an organization that is on a hiring spree for the engineering teams. The reason for it is because instead of catering to doubts of new joinees individually, they can be asked to refer to the Stack Overflow and hence will save a lot of time for both new joiners as well as the existing employees. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	XWiki SAS XWiki is very well suited for a very wide range of web collaboration and web development. Stéphane Laurière CTO Read full review
Pros	Stack Overflow Sharing technical solutions to problems we encounter in our internal development environment. Sharing best practices we find in external resources. Discussions on design patterns and conventions we can use in our projects. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	XWiki SAS XWiki makes it easy to manage semi-structured information, which is at the heart of every knowledge nexus of organizations. It makes it easy to manage in a single system both structured data (such as memberships, projects), and unstructured data. XWiki offers a very rich API for creating enterprise applications quickly that are easy to maintain and evolve collaboratively. XWiki templating and skinning system is extremely flexible and powerful. Stéphane Laurière CTO Read full review
Cons	Stack Overflow I would recommend an increased engineering focus on the Microsoft Teams integration. It would be nice to make more medals. Easier ways to earn points. Incentivized Brandon Camerer Senior User Experience Designer Read full review	XWiki SAS While the basic pieces are available for turning XWiki into an advanced semantic system, some features could be made available more prominently to the user for easing the use of faceted and typed links, paving the way for a new era of collaborative knowledge sharing. Stéphane Laurière CTO Read full review
Alternatives Considered	Stack Overflow It's easier to use Stack Overflow for Teams Q&A to maintain our knowledge base over time, over the Confluence wikis that we also maintain. You don't need to bother about folders, filenames, templates - just ask a question and answer it or get it answered. It feels less formal, so developers feel more free to add content. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	XWiki SAS XWiki key differentiators in my opinion: Fast app development framework with very rich API Open-source strategy, opening the way to collaborative innovation Stéphane Laurière CTO Read full review
Return on Investment	Stack Overflow It makes the search for answers more efficient, so devs can focus in more important things. Knowledge is not lost, even if people leave the company. Incentivized Verified User Read full review	XWiki SAS XWiki has a positive impact on the OW2 communication and collaborations strategies. It saves time when developing applications. Stéphane Laurière CTO Read full review
ScreenShots		XWiki Screenshots