Taskworld is a project management solution built around task management and collaboration capabilities.
$8
per month per user
Teamleader
Score6 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Teamleader is a user-friendly and feature-rich platform which combines CRM, invoicing, and project management into one simple tool. The all-in-one tool aims to help small and medium-sized enterprises organize their sales processes & workflows, communicate effectively & build better relationships with their clients, and improve the productivity & collaboration across their teams. As a platform that provides users with the capability to work smarter, Teamleader offers an online CRM which…
$59
2 users/month
Pricing
Taskworld
Teamleader
Editions & Modules
Free
$0
Premium
$8
per month per user
Business
$15
per month per user
Projects
$59.00
2 users/month
Project Management
$59.00
2 users/month
Support tickets
$59.00
2 users/month
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
Taskworld
Teamleader
Free Trial
No
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
Yes
No
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
No
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
$29 2 users/month
Additional Details
Plans are billed annually.
extra user is + $12.00/user/month
More Pricing Information
Features
Taskworld
Teamleader
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of Taskworld and Teamleader
Feature
Taskworld
7.4
2 Ratings
4% below category average
Teamleader
-
Ratings
Task Management
8.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Resource Management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Scheduling
9.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow Automation
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Team Collaboration
9.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Agile Methodology
6.92 Ratings
00 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
5.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Document Management
5.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email integration
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Mobile Access
7.52 Ratings
00 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
8.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
7.01 Ratings
00 Ratings
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of Taskworld and Teamleader
Feature
Taskworld
-
Ratings
Teamleader
8.6
2 Ratings
9% above category average
Customer data management / contact management
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Workflow management
00 Ratings
5.01 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Quote & order management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Interaction tracking
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of Taskworld and Teamleader
Feature
Taskworld
-
Ratings
Teamleader
8.3
1 Ratings
8% above category average
Case management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
Call center management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Help desk management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of Taskworld and Teamleader
Feature
Taskworld
-
Ratings
Teamleader
10.0
1 Ratings
26% above category average
Lead management
00 Ratings
10.01 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of Taskworld and Teamleader
Feature
Taskworld
-
Ratings
Teamleader
9.0
2 Ratings
16% above category average
Task management
00 Ratings
10.02 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
00 Ratings
9.02 Ratings
Reporting
00 Ratings
8.02 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of Taskworld and Teamleader
Feature
Taskworld
-
Ratings
Teamleader
6.5
1 Ratings
16% below category average
Custom fields
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Custom objects
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of Taskworld and Teamleader
Feature
Taskworld
-
Ratings
Teamleader
9.0
1 Ratings
7% above category average
Single sign-on capability
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Integrations with 3rd-party Software
Comparison of Integrations with 3rd-party Software features of Taskworld and Teamleader
Feature
Taskworld
-
Ratings
Teamleader
6.0
1 Ratings
23% below category average
Compensation management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of Taskworld and Teamleader
I don't know anything about pricing, but if Taskworld were an inexpensive choice I would say it works fairly well for small to mid-sized companies with complex workflows. It's great for managing tasks that move through multiple-stage pipelines that aren't necessarily linear. However, depending on the price it's not worth the spend for all the technical difficulties it brought. Our company was relatively small (60 employees) and yet we constantly faced "server issues" and bugs and even software-wide crashes that seriously impacted our ability to do business. If you choose to go with Taskworld, be sure you have a solid disaster-management plan in place just in case, because chances are you'll experience bugs on a weekly basis
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Task Management - It's super easy to track progress on Taskworld. If your team keeps up with it, you'll never wonder where in the project someone is, because it's marked.
Project checklists - Having these to organize out smaller portions of the tasks makes everything so much easier and helps keep track of progress.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Taskworld crashed ALL THE TIME. It was so frustrating. You'd notice certain functions not working (like adding an additional location or reassigning a task) and then the whole thing would go down. We lost at least 3 individual business days due to Taskworld acting up.
We often requested features and bug fixes that took forever to be resolved. Taskworld staff was responsive, but issues took too long to resolve. As a small example, the GIF functionality of chat and task communication was down for weeks with no explanation.
Small glitches were frequent and obnoxious. We had to clear caches all the time in hopes that we'd be able to use Taskworld the way it was intended. There were many times employees didn't get notified of their "@ mentions" or weren't seeing notifications at all. It was a nightmare of death by a thousand cuts.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I can't say too much about the support we've gotten from Taskworld, because we haven't needed it. There haven't been any issues we've to have to reach out about because it works too well. Given the quality of the application, I'm sure the quality of the support follows.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We used Basecamp very briefly before switching over to Taskworld. Basecamp wasn't nearly as dynamic as Taskworld and served more as a static archive than an active workflow software.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info