TrustRadius: an HG Insights company

Save this comparison

Save this comparison

Add Product

Recommended Comparisons

    Overview
    ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price

    HighQ

    Score8 out of 10
    N/AHighQ Collaborate, now from Thomson Reuters (acquired 2019) is a cloud-based enterprise collaboration platform, featuring secure file sharing but also means for sharing documents with users outside the enterprise, as well as a user-interface optimized for mobile devices and intuitive interface, with real-time communication.N/A

    Tungsten Capture

    Score9.5 out of 10
    N/ATungsten Capture (formerly Kofax Capture) is a suite of multichannel document capture applications.

    $3,500

    per year

    Pricing
    HighQTungsten Capture
    Editions & Modules
    No answers on this topic
    Kofax Capture
    $3,500
    per year
    Offerings
    Pricing Offerings
    HighQTungsten Capture
    Free Trial
    NoNo
    Free/Freemium Version
    NoNo
    Premium Consulting/Integration Services
    NoNo
    Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeNo setup fee
    Additional Details——
    More Pricing Information
    Features
    HighQTungsten Capture
    Project Management
    Comparison of Project Management features of Thomson Reuters HighQ and Tungsten Capture
    Feature
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.2
    2 Ratings
    6% above category average
    Tungsten Capture
    -
    Ratings
    Task Management8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Scheduling8.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Workflow Automation9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Mobile Access9.32 Ratings00 Ratings
    Search9.62 Ratings00 Ratings
    Visual planning tools5.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Communication
    Comparison of Communication features of Thomson Reuters HighQ and Tungsten Capture
    Feature
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    8.6
    2 Ratings
    8% above category average
    Tungsten Capture
    -
    Ratings
    Chat9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Notifications9.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Discussions9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Surveys6.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Internal knowledgebase10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    File Sharing & Management
    Comparison of File Sharing & Management features of Thomson Reuters HighQ and Tungsten Capture
    Feature
    Thomson Reuters HighQ
    9.4
    2 Ratings
    16% above category average
    Tungsten Capture
    -
    Ratings
    Versioning10.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Video files9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Audio files9.01 Ratings00 Ratings
    Document collaboration9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Access control9.22 Ratings00 Ratings
    Advanced security features10.02 Ratings00 Ratings
    Best Alternatives
    HighQTungsten Capture
    Small Businesses
    Flock
    Score9.5 out of 10
    M‑Files
    Score8.9 out of 10
    Medium-sized Companies
    Troop Messenger
    Score9.8 out of 10
    Esker
    Score7.4 out of 10
    Enterprises
    Cisco Business Edition 7000 (discontinued)
    Score9 out of 10
    DocuWare
    Score7.8 out of 10
    All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
    User Ratings
    HighQTungsten Capture
    Likelihood to Recommend
    9.2
    (2 ratings)
    9.2
    (9 ratings)
    Likelihood to Renew
    -
    (0 ratings)
    9.0
    (1 ratings)
    Usability
    -
    (0 ratings)
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    Support Rating
    10.0
    (1 ratings)
    5.0
    (1 ratings)
    User Testimonials
    HighQTungsten Capture
    Likelihood to Recommend
    Thomson Reuters
    HighQ Collaborate is well suited to situations where a law firm maintains numerous documents for a client and the client needs access to them on a regular basis. For example, we may store the client's minute book (which is relatively common for a large corporate law firm to do), but the client may need access to documents in that minute book on a regular basis. Likewise, we have an internal system at the firm for hosting digital versions of closing books, however, many clients would not have a similar system because they would only receive closing books irregularly. USBs get lost and the client might not want to put the closing book on the main server where anyone can access it. By putting the closing book on the extranet site, the individuals in the client's organization who should be able to access the closing book can do so.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Kofax [Capture] meets our needs and for the most part is easy to use and setup. Configuration could be a little bit easier. The scripting language is a double edge sword if you will. It gives you nearly unlimited possibilities to script what you need, but the downside is you have to script it. Does a good job at batching and scanning documents. The tool integrates well into our workflow which makes our business partners happy and in turn provides for happy customers.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Pros
    Thomson Reuters
    • Document sharing. This product makes it easy to upload, review and organize documents related to a particular project or matter.
    • Permissions. Collaborate allows very granular permissions to be assigned for shared documents and administrative activities such as workflows.
    • Reliability. The product is cloud-based and rarely, if ever, unavailable.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • The VRS application included with Kofax Capture is the best image pre-processing platform available on the market today. It can handle a wide array of common document problems such as skew, flipping, wrinkles, lines, and dots.
    • The platform is incredibly scriptable and can be customized to handle all sorts of unusual document contents to allow information to be extracted that many other platforms just struggle on. Table extraction, line item matching, and smart extraction are all strong points with this platform.
    • Through the use of SBL and .NET the platform can be expanded and scaled quite easily to allow for the software to be integrated into existing business processes and platforms with ease.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Cons
    Thomson Reuters
    • It is just not that exciting. We host documents on there for clients but the extranet sites have ultimately turned out to not be a product that our clients are clamoring for or that we are regularly pushing.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • We struggled with configuring Kofax with AP Automation. We used to receive vouchers in different formats by different companies, by different departments. The people from different departments used to scan those vouchers through regular scanners to a central location, which ended up as image pdfs. We fed these image pdfs through Kofax Capture for character recognition, which was painful as the accuracy of recognition was 50 to 60%.
    • Having a connectors with a workflow tool would be helpful where people can validate and approve the output.
    • More samples and documentation related to use of API in .NET applications would be a good improvement, that would help users to adapt the product easily into their organization.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Likelihood to Renew
    Thomson Reuters
    No answers on this topic
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Cost of Kofax is high, however the cost to benefit scenarios always pay off.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Usability
    Thomson Reuters
    No answers on this topic
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    It's good.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Support Rating
    Thomson Reuters
    The interface is easy to use and overall the software seems pretty robust (I haven't had any crashes yet), so I haven't had to use the support very often. Likewise, I don't think I've ever had a client e-mail me with questions or issues - the software is pretty idiot-proof.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Haven't really used their support yet
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Alternatives Considered
    Thomson Reuters
    I feel that HighQ does not really have any real competition in this space because it simply accomplishes its goals far better than the competition at lower cost, while requiring less training and administration.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    Kofax Capture is much costlier with compared to other competitive applications but is also provides many more features than other applications.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Return on Investment
    Thomson Reuters
    • Permits fairly simple administration by a single person for hundreds of Extranets
    • One shop stopping for reliable, secure document sharing and signing with external parties
    • Simple enough to use that internal and external users do not need training to take advantage of the product.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    Tungsten Automation formerly Kofax
    • We were able to decrease personnel expenditures as there was not a need for individuals to index documents prior to incorporating them into the record.
    Incentivized
    Read full review
    ScreenShots