TrackWise vs. Verint Automated Quality Management

We use Trackwise to record non-conformances that are reported by our clients and also the non-conformances that are found within the manufacturing floor during the manufacturing process. TrackWise is extremely easy to use and can be customized as per user needs. It is easy to create records and define child-parent relationships in the software. Users can pull customized reports and they can create dashboards as per the business demands to make sure they can track non-conformance resolution cycle time. We use TrackWise in integration with SAP which makes the system accessible to a wider user base. It is not only used to record the non-conformances, but also the part disposition details in cases where a part is supposed to be delivered from the client to us and in cases where the part is delivered to suppliers. We also use TrackWise to record the corrective actions and root cause for the reported issue. Trackwise is widely used to record Audits assessments in our organization. Trackwise is also used to report workmanship issues and to record the cycle time involved to resolve the issue and corrective actions taken to avoid the issue in the future.

Getting a view of all calls and a good pool of calls is the automated qualities strong suite. It can validate and score anything that is within he applicable rule set. Usually, AQM is good for answering yes/no questions, would like to see some functionality around call segments or actions like hold

Incentivized

• Tracking System
• Search Function

Incentivized

• Agent Score Cards
• Advise when agents need coaching / additional training
• Enable 100% scaling of call / interaction monitoring
• Reduce resources needed to otherwise manually review agents.

Incentivized

• No suggestion for improvements

• Layering in additional conditions into questions could probably be improved slightly. A lot of time is being spent on rebuilds and customizing additional layers of questioning.

Incentivized

The user experience is great and I would recommend other's to use trackwise for it's customization flexibility

It is easy to use. Easy navigation. Flexible to customize. Real-time analytics help to track the record cycle time. Can be used by multiple departments for various business processes.

Access cannot be restricted in the form designer at the form level. In order to give admin access for AQM it opens up access to all form. In a company with multiple organizations, we wouldn't want others to be able to modify forms.

Incentivized

I did not interact with the support team.

Incentivized

Trackwise is better than Arena. You need sign-offs before moving to the next step. While in Arena, you can complete the whole task and request sign off later. Not sure which is better for everyone, but I prefer to sign off before moving to the next step.

Incentivized

We did not know how to use it effectively at first so we got extra training but it doesn't really help us where we spend the most time evaluating quality - on procedural/technical accuracy.

Incentivized

• Got rid of paper tracking.
• Saves time by easily searching data base.

Incentivized

• We had another product that we decommissioned so we have been without AQM for 9 months now
• Negative, Still not up and running as expected

Incentivized