IBM Turbonomic vs. VMware vCenter

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
IBM Turbonomic
Score 8.5 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
IBM Turbonomic is a performance and cost optimization platform for public, private, and hybrid clouds used by cloud, infrastructure operations, and architecture to assure application performance while eliminating inefficiencies by dynamically resourcing applications through automated actions. IBM states that Turbonomic customers report an average 33% reduction in cloud and infrastructure waste without impacting application performance, and return-on-investment of 471% over three years over…
$3,333
per month per installation
VMware vCenter
Score 9.0 out of 10
N/A
VMware vCenter is an advanced server management software that provides a centralized platform for controlling vSphere environments for visibility across hybrid clouds. VMware vCenter is no longer sold as a standalone product and is now available as a part of VMware Cloud Foundation.
$6,044
per year
Pricing
IBM TurbonomicVMware vCenter
Editions & Modules
IBM® Turbonomic Cloud Optimization Essentials
$3,333
per month per installation
IBM® Turbonomic Hybrid Standard (Software)
Varies - Request a Quote
per month Advanced hybrid cloud optimization capabilities for customers with 200 managed virtual servers (MVS) or more
IBM® Turbonomic Cloud Standard
Varies - Request a Quote
per month For customers with more than $2 million USD annual cloud spend
IBM® Turbonomic Hybrid Standard
Varies - Request a Quote
per month Advanced hybrid cloud optimization capabilities for customers with 200 managed virtual servers (MVS) or more
Basic
6,044
per year
Production
6,244
per year
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
IBM TurbonomicVMware vCenter
Free Trial
YesNo
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
YesNo
Entry-level Setup FeeOptionalNo setup fee
Additional Details* Estimated prices do not include tax and are for new Turbonomic customers, initial purchase only. Volume discounting available.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
IBM TurbonomicVMware vCenter
Considered Both Products
IBM Turbonomic
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We tried the vRealize Suite but found it complicated and not very intuitive for first-time users. Meaning we could log into Turbonomic and click around to figure out what we needed, whereas vRealize was not as user-friendly in its UI. Ultimately that was why we choose to go …
Chose IBM Turbonomic
I think it provided a compelling choice especially when you factor in cost. Plus the great capacity planning already included in VMTurbo.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We didn't really consider any other vendors. I know VMware has an option, but I was not interested in VMware's pricing model.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
Turbonomic is a very good product. It is much more than a tool for monitoring and optimization for the VMware environment. Specifically, it can also have insights into the Cisco UCS world and can optimize that too! So it is not operating only on the VM level.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
With Turbonomic you can have an aggregator instance. In this instance you add as a Turbonomic target another Turbonomic server that you have in your environment. With an aggregator instance you can manage several Turbonomic servers from a central location.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
While vCenter Server from VMware is a great product, it is designed to be more of an informational and warning system, rather than a proactive take action automatically when needed system. That is the core difference. Also, pricing wise it is more expensive than Turbonomic.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
It's a lot more intuitive, much cheaper and a lot less of a resource hog
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We looked at the old vCOPS suite from VMware. Turbonomic, at the time, had a lot more capability and functionality so we went with it. This was two years ago so I am unsure how the two products stack up now.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We used VROPS from VMWare and found that VMTurbo Operations Manager was just a better product. It did things more fundamentally and was much easier to manage. I could have a lower end person managing VMTurbo Operations Manger than VROPS and I get more functionality also at a …
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We found that the ease of implementation with VMTurbo was superior. We also found that it was incredibly simple to update and upgrade. Finally we found that it was incredibly lightweight in resources in comparison to its competitors.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
VMTurbo is easier to deploy and manage. It also has the capacity planner, which VMware vROPs doesn't have at this time.
Chose IBM Turbonomic

International Paper reviewed vKernel and VMware Operations Manager (now vRealize).

We found that vKernel didn't provide the in depth analytics provided by Turbonomic across all the nodes of the cluster. It did not consolidate the information into easy to understand metrics.

VMwar…

Chose IBM Turbonomic
VMTurbo has a smaller computing and storage footprint than the other tools tested. It was very easy to set up and within 2 hours it was already highlighting areas of interest. There was no requirement to get any professional services involved, and no other products are required …
Chose IBM Turbonomic
At the time of purchase we didn't see anything that was on the same level as VMTurbo for VM management and application placement. VMware's native product is significantly lacking unless you can afford the higher level licensing model.
Chose IBM Turbonomic
We did not look at any other solutions, once we had the first demo of VMTurbo Operations Manager.
VMware vCenter
Chose VMware vCenter
Honestly it made no sense to look elsewhere since vCenter is an integral component of VMware and designed and supported but he same team. We need to ensure business operational continuity and did not want to end up in a finger pointing contest with a 3rd party product.
Top Pros

No answers on this topic

Top Cons

No answers on this topic

Features
IBM TurbonomicVMware vCenter
Cloud Management
Comparison of Cloud Management features of Product A and Product B
IBM Turbonomic
7.8
6 Ratings
11% below category average
VMware vCenter
-
Ratings
Cloud Management Security8.06 Ratings00 Ratings
Automation and Orchestration7.96 Ratings00 Ratings
Cost Management7.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Cloud Management Performance Monitoring7.96 Ratings00 Ratings
Governance and Compliance7.76 Ratings00 Ratings
Resource Management7.46 Ratings00 Ratings
Systems Integration7.86 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
IBM TurbonomicVMware vCenter
Small Businesses
VMware Cloud Director
VMware Cloud Director
Score 9.8 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Medium-sized Companies
Rubrik
Rubrik
Score 8.7 out of 10
NinjaOne
NinjaOne
Score 9.2 out of 10
Enterprises
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
vRealize Operations (discontinued)
Score 8.3 out of 10

No answers on this topic

All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
IBM TurbonomicVMware vCenter
Likelihood to Recommend
8.4
(138 ratings)
9.7
(50 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
9.0
(24 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Usability
8.0
(20 ratings)
9.0
(2 ratings)
Availability
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
7.8
(6 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.5
(25 ratings)
9.0
(5 ratings)
In-Person Training
8.2
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Online Training
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
9.7
(18 ratings)
9.0
(1 ratings)
Configurability
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Contract Terms and Pricing Model
9.1
(2 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.0
(4 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Professional Services
10.0
(1 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
10.0
(3 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
IBM TurbonomicVMware vCenter
Likelihood to Recommend
IBM
Turbonomic helps us see what uses resources and what needs more and how to reorganize to maximize hardware use. I think companies with multiple VMware clusters would benefit from this software. Perhaps not if the company is small. However, Turbo Operations Manager is best for virtualizing data-intensive platforms like SQL.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
The VMware vCenter server is very useful in maintaining the CPU/RAM/datastore resources are balanced when there are multiple ESX/ESXi host servers. It is clear what resources are being used, and it is easy to migrate VMs to different ESX/ESXi hosts. Being able to remotely connect to the VM servers in vCenter when you cannot have other remote connections helps in maintenance and troubleshooting.
Read full review
Pros
IBM
  • Presentation is nice. Its easy to understand what your looking at and the data that is being presented to you.
  • Properly identify resource utilization and recommendations for action on how VMs can be improved and resources can be better utilized.
  • It was also able to tell us the same information and analysis for cloud resources. I was not expecting that.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • VSAN storage management and redundancy - high performance IO with built in fault tolerance across the cluster, not reliant on a single hardware item
  • VM fault tolerance. The ability to relocate a running VM and restart VMs from failed or isolated nodes
  • Resource management and alerting. Tracking load across physical systems and allowing us to rebalance for better utilisation
Read full review
Cons
IBM
  • It would be nice if the UI included a break-down of features that are both licensed as well as un-licensed. That way, you could not only see what you have, but what you don't.
  • The right-sizing recommendations are great, but very little info is given about why the recommendation is being made. More info would not only increase understanding, but would also help drive decision-making.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • Currently, the HTML 5-based vSphere Client lets you manage the essential functions of vSphere from any browser, however, it would be nice if they would port all management functions over to the HTML 5-based Client.
  • Performing updates and upgrades to the infrastructure is a bit challenging for someone that may not be as intimate with vSphere. I think the updates/upgrades should be more integrated into the UI and provide the ability to push to the hosts, etc...
  • It would also be nice to have a more robust snapshot management tool to prevent snapshot overgrowth. It would be nice to be able to set a lifespan for the snapshot(s)
Read full review
Likelihood to Renew
IBM
We are certainly happy with Turbonomic as a whole and have invested quite a bit of time and effort into learning the ins and outs of the product. We have our reporting setup the way we want it and have gained definite value from these features. I will say though that many products nowadays are offering more native monitoring, reporting, and alerting features which may eventually steer us away from this product
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
We are very dependent on this software, it has become a much needed tool to perform the daily tasks that are required to maintain the virtual server environment. VMware has become very pricey over the years, so we are looking for alternatives for cost savings strategy, but nothing has been found to be on par to what we are currently using
Read full review
Usability
IBM
Excellent approach to larger VM organizational management. They have an very clean integrated dashboard that allows us to see everything in our environment and what that is doing in real-time. It works on multiple hyper-visors really well and integrates capacity planning on my local site as well as my cloud locations.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
VMware vCenter Server does a great job with maintaining your virtual environment. It has great role based features to delegate various administrative tasks to multiple users. It is an excellent 'all in one' dashboard for viewing all aspects of your vSphere infrastructure. All alerts to software and hardware issues are easy to trace from this interface
Read full review
Reliability and Availability
IBM
VMTurbo has not caused any outages by not doing what we expect it to do.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Performance
IBM
It allocates resources among applications by showing more on the cost breakdown by cloud service, with metrics on cloud provider information like Azure Management, Identity, Networking, Storage with costs per day, and total services costs. This then could facilitate and show the corresponding actions thereafter upon scaling.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
IBM
When I contact support I get a quick response and they are able to solve my problem quickly. I also get a sense that they want to make sure that we are getting value from the product and walk me through whatever steps are needed to accomplish my goals.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
VMware support has always been fantastic and they have been invaluable in solving tougher issues that have been run into. Most of the time, any oddities encountered are fixed by available updates. This can be deduced by support quickly with logs within vCenter. We have not run into something yet that support was unable to help with. They either have a solution already, or they are able to find one quickly.
Read full review
In-Person Training
IBM
Alex (from VMTurbo) has worked with the product for years and helped develop the product. He was very knowledgeable and was able to provide our support team with details knowledge on how to get our deployment configured correctly as well as help with another VMTurbo POC within another customers environment.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Online Training
IBM
After buying VMTurbo Operations Manager, I was invited to an online user training event. I felt this training was effective and dug just deep enough to be informative yet still keep my attention. Additionally, the webinar was free.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
IBM
The implementation was very simple. Just upload an OVA file and power on the VM. Once it comes up enter some networking information and you can then access the web interface. From there, just begin configuring the system for your environment by adding you license and the various virtual environments and storage through the inventory tab
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
Since moving away from the Windows Server hosting the vCenter application and instead using a virtual appliance, it has become much easier to implement and deploy the new versions. We can easily create a snapshot or clone of the vCenter vApp to ensure any problems encountered during the upgrade can be mitigated with a fall back to the old version to prevent unscheduled downtime.
Read full review
Alternatives Considered
IBM
As the organization had experience of years in using IBM products, we had the confidence that they will provide us with great support. And we needed a reliable solution as a financial institute to ensure continuous operations. Even though the price was very high, we made the correct decision to go ahead with IBM Turbonomic as the feedback from existing users in the region was very positive. We needed a solution which was capable of handling our automation requirements. All these were green in IBM Turbonomic.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
Citrix Xen Server.... Great Hypervisor but very limited in terms of functionality
MS Hyper-V... [VMware vCenter Server] is better for almost everything and appliance form makes a clear winner for security and ease of deployment
Read full review
Scalability
IBM
easy scalable, adding new clusters in, no big deal.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Professional Services
IBM
Professional services were always there to guide us in our transformation to the cloud. They understood our business model and then were able to provide guidance on what we needed from the tool.
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
IBM
  • Application performance has been a big one. With Turbonomic keeping everything running at top performance, it can make changes when extra resources are need, quicker than somebody being notified and then making the necessary changes.
  • Turbonomic has been a great cost savings for us on multiple occasions. We use it every time we are improving servers.
  • With the planning feature we get the best performance form new hardware purchases
Read full review
VMware by Broadcom
  • The positive impact of vcenter is definitely felt in larger organisations in terms of being able to manage multiple servers all in one environment
  • It will decrease the amount of time your server engineers will have to spend in the server room or datacenter.
Read full review
ScreenShots

IBM Turbonomic Screenshots

Screenshot of IBM Turbonomic Action Center, where it shows the list of optimization actions across the global environment—on-prem and cloud—that should be taken to minimize cost while assuring performance.Screenshot of IBM Turbonomic Application, a view that shows the global environment across private and public infrastructure from the context of individual application components. Users can optimize one application at a time by viewing each app's pending actions. The Supply Chain at left shows all of the entities across applications and their interdependencies.Screenshot of the IBM Turbonomic Cloud Executive Dashboard, an out of the box dashboard that allow users to rapidly communicate value to executives. This view shows the cloud cost savings opportunities realized and not yet realized over any time period.Screenshot of the IBM Turbonomic Action Center, a display of the list of optimization actions across the global environment—on-prem and cloud—that should be taken to minimize cost while assuring performance.Screenshot of an IBM Turbonomic Cloud view, where the public cloud environment(s) and all of the pending actions required to bring them into an efficient, performant state. The Supply Chain at left shows all of the entities in the public cloud(s) and their interdependencies.Screenshot of the IBM Turbonomic On-Prem viewl that shows the user's private data center environment(s) and all of the pending actions required to bring them into an efficient, performant state. The Supply Chain at left shows all of the entities in data center(s) and the interdependencies between them.