WORKetc is a cloud-based business management system. With integrated CRM, project management, billing, help desk, reporting, and collaboration, teams can access one system for all relevant information. The system supports popular third-party apps such as Google Workspace, Xero Accounting, Quickbooks Online, Outlook, Dropbox, and Evernote.
$78
per month
Worksection
Score10 out of 10
Small Businesses (1-50 employees)
Worksection is a project management platform that brings tasks, planning, time tracking, team communication, and file storage into a single system. It provides task and subtask management, Gantt charts, Kanban boards, and a calendar for planning; built-in time tracking with hourly rates for client billing; per-task discussions, role-based access permissions, and reporting dashboards. Pricing is charged per user, with a free plan for up to five users. It is used by teams of 5 to 50+ employees in…
$5
per month per user
Pricing
WORKetc
Worksection
Editions & Modules
Starter Edition
$78
Per Month for up to 2 Users
Team
$195
Per month for up to 3 Users (Each extra user + $49/month)
Foundations
$395
Per month for up to 5 Users (Each extra user + $59/month)
Free
$0
Basic
$5
per month per user
Business
$10
per month per user
Premium
$15
per month per user
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
WORKetc
Worksection
Free Trial
Yes
Yes
Free/Freemium Version
No
Yes
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
Yes
No
Entry-level Setup Fee
No setup fee
No setup fee
Additional Details
—
All paid plans are priced per user. Annual billing −25%; 2-year billing −30%. Free plan for teams of up to 5 users.
More Pricing Information
Features
WORKetc
Worksection
Sales Force Automation
Comparison of Sales Force Automation features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
7.9
13 Ratings
1% above category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Customer data management / contact management
8.613 Ratings
00 Ratings
Workflow management
8.312 Ratings
00 Ratings
Opportunity management
7.810 Ratings
00 Ratings
Integration with email client (e.g., Outlook or Gmail)
7.913 Ratings
00 Ratings
Contract management
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Quote & order management
8.18 Ratings
00 Ratings
Interaction tracking
7.82 Ratings
00 Ratings
Channel / partner relationship management
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customer Service & Support
Comparison of Customer Service & Support features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
8.3
12 Ratings
8% above category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Case management
9.011 Ratings
00 Ratings
Call center management
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Help desk management
8.512 Ratings
00 Ratings
Marketing Automation
Comparison of Marketing Automation features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
7.4
11 Ratings
4% below category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Lead management
7.710 Ratings
00 Ratings
Email marketing
7.19 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Project Management
Comparison of CRM Project Management features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
8.1
13 Ratings
5% above category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Task management
8.713 Ratings
00 Ratings
Billing and invoicing management
7.810 Ratings
00 Ratings
Reporting
7.912 Ratings
00 Ratings
CRM Reporting & Analytics
Comparison of CRM Reporting & Analytics features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
7.3
11 Ratings
5% below category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Pipeline visualization
7.59 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customizable reports
7.211 Ratings
00 Ratings
Customization
Comparison of Customization features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
8.0
13 Ratings
5% above category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Custom fields
8.413 Ratings
00 Ratings
Custom objects
8.22 Ratings
00 Ratings
API for custom integration
7.310 Ratings
00 Ratings
Security
Comparison of Security features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
8.9
11 Ratings
6% above category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Single sign-on capability
9.11 Ratings
00 Ratings
Role-based user permissions
8.811 Ratings
00 Ratings
Social CRM
Comparison of Social CRM features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
7.3
1 Ratings
3% below category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Social data
7.31 Ratings
00 Ratings
Platform
Comparison of Platform features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
7.5
13 Ratings
2% below category average
Worksection
-
Ratings
Mobile access
7.513 Ratings
00 Ratings
Project Management
Comparison of Project Management features of WORKetc and Worksection
Feature
WORKetc
-
Ratings
Worksection
7.7
1 Ratings
0% above category average
Task Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Resource Management
00 Ratings
6.01 Ratings
Gantt Charts
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Scheduling
00 Ratings
9.01 Ratings
Workflow Automation
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Team Collaboration
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Support for Waterfall Methodology
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Document Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Mobile Access
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Timesheet Tracking
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Change request and Case Management
00 Ratings
8.01 Ratings
Budget and Expense Management
00 Ratings
7.01 Ratings
Professional Services Automation
Comparison of Professional Services Automation features of WORKetc and Worksection
If you are looking for a way to organize customer data and projects across regions, then WORK[etc] will get the job done. For our company, the country is divided into 3 regions and each region has a team of workers in charge of providing ongoing support services to that region. WORK[etc] has organized our company exponentially and given us a solid database to pull from to ensure we're meeting contractual requirements, providing timely deliverables and staying ahead of the game. Because I only work in a service industry, I don't know if WORK[etc] would be appropriate for product based companies, However, if you were offering anything [product or service] that required online support, the system will function well.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
I can prescribe Worksection for computerized offices, for organizations that consider the season of their representatives and who pitch time to their clients
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Connecting all the different methods of communicating with our clients into one place is the best part of the application to us. The Google Apps integration lets us update all of our WORK[etc] details directly from our email page which saves a huge amount of time. It lets us move back and forth freely between WORK[etc] tools and our Google Apps email, documents, calendar, etc. with ease.
Breaking work according to what we are doing helps us group and ungroup things as needed. Since we do tech support and so much more having the ability to connect projects, support cases, to dos, documents, discussions, and more all together makes it easy to work with the relationships of all the different activity.
We have found the discussion tool to be vital to moving things through quickly. There are many discussions that are just FYI while others really need a decision or answer form the team members. Discussions allows us to quickly note the people we need to answer us and what is there as an FYI. It keeps all that history so our decision process become documented easily and not lost in email chains.
I like adaptable assignments and subtasks, extended security for errands and remarks (since we are working with our customers inside Worksection) and inherent clock with hourly rates.
Worksection encourages us to break down complex undertaking into assignments and subtasks, set due dates and control time spent.
We additionally share reports from Worksection to our customers, it encourages us to assemble straightforward relations with our customers. What's more, we figure pay for our representative in view of these reports.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The one key issue that it doesn't solve is resource utilisation. You are able to add the number of hours that each "to do" will take but you can't allocate that to an employee and then aggregate all that up to show how much capacity you are using or have left.
One if its great benefits is its flexibility but that is also a drawback because there are multiple ways to do the same thing. This means that to ensure consistency across all employees having your own business procedures on how to use WORKetc is vital.
Some of the financial processes don't fully reflect UK practice currently. For instance it doesn't deal with VAT on expenditure well. However we have been assured that this is being resolved.
Issues with composing editorial - must reload page to write
Old style design
Unfortunately there is no work area customer, it would be exceptionally valuable. Continually fixing to the Internet, extremely awkward when it isn't. I have this happens all the time. I'm sitting tight for new forms and I trust that I won't be disillusioned.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
We, as a company, have put a lot of time and energy into building the system to where it is for us today. With its constant improvements and our continually learning and developing, I couldn't imagine moving away from WORKetc to try a different system out. This really does give us everything that we've wanted/needed in a system without having to utilize 2-3 different products. The part that makes this so unique compared to other systems that we've used in the past is the fact that it has a project management piece built in, and that in itself is a huge driving point in why we will continue to use this.
My staff hates it, our clients require transparency and you manual have to enter notes, billing is horrific, as it does not subtotal by type - so as a T&M shop there is no way to easily see how much was spent to each matter or service type.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
WORKetc compares well in regards to speed and reliability to other cloud-based products we use such as Google for Work. Compared to our old in-house based CRM, it is a superstar; faster, more reliable and easily run on a variety of browsers and smart phones. The program loads fast as do data screens for contacts, projects, invoices and more
WORKetc offers maybe the best support in the business. Product documentation and training resources are outstanding. Support tickets or inquiries are answered quickly. If you do need to address an issue in person, it is easy to schedule a 15 or 30 minute live call with their fantastic support staff who are fast, friendly and skilled
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
The implementation of the system was fairly easy. Because of our previous experience with a similar system, we were ready and working on the product as soon as we announced the switch. The system also allowed us to simplify our processes by integrating timesheets and project management directly into our CMS.
We needed a CRM that would work with US. We found WORK [etc] was exactly what we needed. being able to customize the CRM around our company and further change as we go has been the best thing about it. We haven't been locked into how it is set up and can change it very quickly.
I like flexible tasks and subtasks, expanded privacy for tasks & comments (because we are working with our clients inside Worksection) and built-in timer with hourly rates. Worksection helps us to decompose complex project into tasks and subtasks, set deadlines and control time spent.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
Setting up project templates is time-consuming - if you want to do it right. Nevertheless, it is well worth it! Routine complex projects that used to require at least six people and at least as many "silos of information" are now done with two or three people, and - at most - 2 or 3 silos of information. And that's only because I haven't fully integrated the program with our Accounting programs (and there is an API for Quickbooks). I'd say the initial investment of perhaps 80 hours on my part was saved five or ten times over during our first six months, with better accuracy, accountability, and documentation. Since then, the ROI is at least 20 or 30 times annually of my time...the one thing I can't buy more of.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info
With this application, we have essentially enhanced the nature of our work, because everything is organized and reasonable. It is exceptionally advantageous that we can interface the customer to Worksection, which streamlines activities.
Incredible cost. The greatest arrangement of 250 GB and a boundless number of "ventures", "organizations" and "individuals" on the record, makes this program the most beneficial - now it is $120 every month, considering the markdown when paying yearly. This is finished opportunity and trustworthiness - lead somewhere around 10 distinct organizations and 1000 individuals.
A de minimis incentive was given to thank the reviewer for their time. The incentive was not used to bias or drive a particular response, nor was the incentive contingent on a positive endorsement. More Info