Altium Develop Reviews & Insights

Summary

Reviewers frequently cite experience with a range of electronic design automation (EDA) tools when considering alternatives to Altium Develop. The most commonly mentioned alternative is KiCad EDA, noted by 40% of reviewers. Following KiCad, OrCAD is another significant alternative, mentioned by 20% of the sample. A group of other platforms, including Siemens PADS, Allegro X Design Platform, and EasyEDA, are also recognized by reviewers, each cited by 12% of the sample. Across all these mentioned alternatives, the sentiment among reviewers is consistently mixed, suggesting that while these tools are considered viable or have been evaluated, their overall performance or suitability in comparison to Altium Develop elicits varied opinions without a clear consensus emerging from the provided data.

Related topics

Summary

The integration of Altium 365 with Altium Develop significantly enhances organizational collaboration and data management for design projects, according to reviewers. A substantial portion of feedback, 40% of reviewers, highlights the improved ease of design sharing and access, both internally and with external stakeholders like customers and consultants. Similarly, 36% of reviewers emphasize the positive impact on team collaboration and communication, noting how it facilitates multi-engineer work and remote interaction. Data management and version control also see notable improvements, cited by 20% of the feedback, particularly concerning component libraries and manufacturing data. While the majority of feedback is positive, a smaller segment of reviewers, 12%, indicated they had not yet utilized the collaborative features, often due to being small teams or single users. A minimal number of reviewers, 8%, reported no change, suggesting that for some, the integration did not introduce new capabilities beyond their existing workflows.

Related topics

Summary

Altium Develop has largely enhanced organizations' PCB design efficiency, with reviewers frequently citing improvements in key areas. A significant factor, mentioned by 28% of reviewers, is the platform's robust component library management, which streamlines part creation and lifecycle tracking. This efficiency extends to collaboration, with 20% of reviewers noting easier teamwork among engineers and cross-functional teams, allowing for more concurrent work. Overall speed and efficiency gains were also highlighted by 20% of the sample, with some reporting substantial acceleration in design processes and reduced errors. The transition from schematic to layout is perceived as smoother, a benefit noted by 16% of users, contributing to faster project completion and reduced manual data entry. While the majority of feedback is positive, a small segment of reviewers (8%) expressed concerns regarding a steep learning curve for new users, and another 8% indicated that the DEVELOP version did not significantly alter their existing workflow compared to older versions.

Related topics

Summary

Altium Develop has a notable positive impact on business objectives, primarily driven by significant time savings in product development and design processes. Over half of the reviewers (52%) highlighted reduced time across various stages, from concept to manufacturing release and schematic design. This efficiency contributes to faster iterations and quicker time to market. While offering substantial value, particularly in comparison to previous Altium products, the platform presents a mixed financial picture, with 32% of reviewers discussing cost. Some found it a good value or a cost-effective alternative, while others noted recent price increases or initial setup challenges that delayed productivity. The platform also contributes positively to operational quality and teamwork, with 12% of reviewers citing a reduction in design errors and fewer board spins, directly impacting manufacturing efficiency. Similarly, 12% of reviewers noted improved collaboration and easier sharing of designs, enabling faster reviews and parallel work. However, the initial learning curve and library setup can be challenging, as indicated by 28% of reviewers who experienced difficulties, sometimes leading to significant delays before full utilization.

Related topics

Summary

Reviewers frequently integrate a variety of software tools alongside Altium Develop, primarily focusing on CAD/CAE, development environments, and general productivity applications. SOLIDWORKS emerged as the most commonly cited complementary software, mentioned by 20% of reviewers, indicating a strong preference for robust mechanical design capabilities in their workflow. Other notable tools include Microsoft Visual Studio and Microsoft Excel, both cited by 12% of the reviewers, suggesting a need for integrated development environments and data management. Furthermore, specialized EDA tools like KiCad EDA, also mentioned by 12% of reviewers, highlight the use of alternative or open-source solutions for electronic design. Autodesk Fusion, mentioned by 8% of reviewers, rounds out the top five, reflecting a continued demand for integrated CAD/CAM/CAE platforms. The overall sentiment towards these tools is consistently positive, with reviewers implicitly recommending them through their regular usage.

Related topics

Summary

Altium Develop is predominantly utilized by organizations for comprehensive printed circuit board (PCB) design and schematic capture, a use case cited by 88% of reviewers. Users leverage the software to create custom PCB designs for various applications, ranging from electronic device development to aerospace and oil and gas tools. The platform addresses the business problem of needing an integrated environment for designing, analyzing, and managing PCB assemblies from initial schematic capture through to manufacturing outputs. Beyond core design, 40% of reviewers highlight the product's role in facilitating collaboration and sharing among engineering teams, procurement, and even external partners, often through cloud-based features. While component library management is seen as a key aspect, mentioned by 40% of reviewers, sentiment is mixed, with some noting challenges in harmonizing components despite the benefits of a common, verified library. The software also supports integration with mechanical CAD (MCAD) tools, noted by 20% of reviewers, and aids in generating essential documentation and manufacturing outputs.

Related topics

Summary

Reviewers identified several key areas where Altium Develop could be improved, with the most frequently cited concern being library management. Nearly half of the reviewers, 48%, found library management to be sluggish, inconsistent, and challenging for tasks like creating new components or managing existing footprints. Performance and stability issues were also a significant concern, with 32% of reviewers reporting lagging, occasional crashes, and general unresponsiveness, especially with larger projects. User interface and usability challenges were noted by 28% of the user base, highlighting difficulties in locating features, inconsistencies across different application modules, and a steep learning curve for new users. Additionally, 16% of reviewers expressed dissatisfaction with licensing policies, particularly the shift to subscription-only models and issues with license control under variable internet conditions. Another 16% of reviewers pointed to the need for improvements in 3D export and rendering capabilities, citing inconsistencies in mechanical exports and a desire for more robust functionality.

Related topics

Summary

Altium Develop is frequently recognized for its robust capabilities across several core aspects of electronic design, providing a comprehensive environment for engineers. Reviewers consistently highlight the platform's strengths in managing component libraries, a feature mentioned by 48% of users, which streamlines component selection and validation. The software also excels in fundamental design tasks, with 40% of reviewers pointing to its strong schematic design functionalities and an equal percentage commending its advanced PCB design and layout tools. Furthermore, its integrated 3D rendering and modeling capabilities, noted by 24% of users, support detailed visualization and fitment checks within higher-level assemblies. The platform's efficiency extends to project management, with 20% of reviewers appreciating its effective Bill of Materials (BOM) management features, which assist in analysis and export processes. These integrated strengths contribute to a cohesive workflow, allowing users to move seamlessly from conceptual design to final manufacturing outputs.

Related topics