Simple yet powerful scheduling software to maximize efficiency
Use Cases and Deployment Scope
In my organization, we need to monitor, modify scheduled jobs in our linux servers. Instead of doing everything manually JAMS is solving our main problem by removing manual work and automating the scheduled , recurring tasks.
It’s saving our time. We use centralized scheduling feature of JAMS to modify server recurring tasks.
It’s saving our time. We use centralized scheduling feature of JAMS to modify server recurring tasks.
Pros
- Centralized management
- Recurring job automation
- Job scheduling
- Managing job dependencies across the servers
Cons
- Documentation for complex linux server should be provided so the administrators can finish deploying JAMS without needing extensive research.
- Configuration customization can be improved by simplifying the process.
- More in depth troubleshooting with detailed instructions where to look would be a good improvement of JAMS scheduler.
Return on Investment
- It is saving our time by reducing manual work we used to do for recurring scheduled processes. Helping my team to focus on other things such as making the product more efficient.
- It’s making our work more scalable and productive. Saving at least 5/6 hours per week is helping us generate more revenue.
- The estimated saving is about 60k per year in operations cost (less people needed to launch process manually)
Alternatives Considered
Control-M
Other Software Used
Oracle Linux, GitHub, Docker
