JAMS vs. Stonebranch

Overview
ProductRatingMost Used ByProduct SummaryStarting Price
JAMS
Score 9.2 out of 10
N/A
JAMS is a centralized workload automation and job scheduling solution that runs, monitors, and manages jobs and workflows. Reliably orchestrate the critical IT processes that run your business from a single pane of glass.
$9,996
per year
Stonebranch
Score 10.0 out of 10
Enterprise companies (1,001+ employees)
Stonebranch provides enterprise-wide workload automation software solutions that are designed to solve complex IT business processes in a simple way - from Amazon Web Services, Docker, OpenStack, Hadoop, Microsoft Azure to z/OS batch processes on the mainframe. Stonebranch’s Universal Automation Center (UAC) is a system of four enterprise workload automation products: Universal Controller Universal Agent Universal Data Mover Universal Data Mover…N/A
Pricing
JAMSStonebranch
Editions & Modules
Core
9,996.00
per year
Advanced
Customized Pricing
per year
No answers on this topic
Offerings
Pricing Offerings
JAMSStonebranch
Free Trial
YesYes
Free/Freemium Version
NoNo
Premium Consulting/Integration Services
NoNo
Entry-level Setup FeeNo setup feeOptional
Additional Details- Core: For small teams getting started with automation. Core Integrations: PowerShell, SQL, Azure Data Factory, Python, 20+ others. - Advanced: Comprehensive solution for large-scale operations. Core Integrations: SAP, JDE, Ellucian Banner, Informatica, Mainframe and Power Systems.Commercial models include Perpetual, Subscription & Usage-based and clients can choose the model that best suits their business. The Stonebranch software license models allow for unlimited concurrent and named users and the Perpetual and Subscription models include unlimited job executions per day – there are no license upgrades due to tasks per day increases. Licenses for a Disaster Recovery site are offered free of charge.
More Pricing Information
Community Pulse
JAMSStonebranch
Considered Both Products
JAMS
Chose JAMS
Being company is already using Global Scape, another product from the same company, so licensing to start using JAMS was easy.
Chose JAMS
We use both in the organization, with JAMS more focused on internal file transfers and Axway MFT used for combination of both internal/external.
Key difference I noted is the alerting feature is better in JAMS compared to Axway MFT, however Axway SaaS (cloud platform) allows for …
Chose JAMS
JAMS is the legacy product in our on-premises environment. Accenture has recently implemented MyWizard, the preferred platform for future operations, which is expected to progressively replace JAMS as part of our broader cloud migration strategy. Given this
Chose JAMS
Only used the Task Scheduler on Microsoft servers, which accurately started jobs on time.
Chose JAMS
I wasn't involved in selecting JAMS; it was pushed down by the architecture team.
Chose JAMS
JAMS is more flexible and easy to configure than Control-M.
Chose JAMS
We base usage of JAMS for the particular business use cases.
Chose JAMS
JAMS overall costs are significantly lower, and support is better overall. If you have a halfway decent technical team, any small to medium business will benefit from JAMS over the rest of the schedulers out there.

The UI is so much cleaner than every competitor we've sampled.
Chose JAMS
We were already experienced with JAMS at a previous company. JAMS was already decided prior to my employment.
Chose JAMS
JAMS fulfilled the same automation functionality at a far less cost and in a simplified licensing model.
Chose JAMS
We chose JAMS because it was the best solution for our business needs, a major factor being the licensing model and the simplicity of the app. We needed to migrate things fast too and this was simply plug and play without too much headache
Chose JAMS
We migrated to JAMS from a previous application that was sunsetted. We were aware that JAMS was more than a like for like replacement for the incumbent application, and in fact was more powerful and flexible. We did consider other solutions, some of which appeared to be more …
Chose JAMS
JAMS is more specialized in Scheduled execution of Jobs with less complexity that B2B. We have been very happy with JAMS in respect to B2B.
Chose JAMS
I was not involved in the selection process.
Chose JAMS
Our developers found it easier to get going with JAMS and there seemed to be better calendar and scheduling options available in JAMS. JAMS also supported legacy OS versions that were unsupported and did not work in Automic. This was a vital requirement in selecting a solution …
Chose JAMS
I have not researched other workload automation products.
Chose JAMS
JAMS is WAY more advanced, it isn't a fair comparison. The history is easy to get through. It is easy to get alerts of complete to failed and with a log. Adding jobs is extremely easy that even my teammates who do not manange the software are able to set them up. With the …
Chose JAMS
Tidal is a very good scheduler but very expensive and customers can't budget for this. REvScheduler is a lot cheaper but the interface isn't very aesthetics and functionality is lacking compared to JAMS. Out of all of them I'd recommend JAMS.
Chose JAMS
In my opinion, while JAMS is useful for point and click like developers, Astro is more useful for software developers, whole like to see "scheduling as code". in the long run, I think Astro might overtake JAMS in terms of usage and use cases that it satisfies across the tech …
Chose JAMS
JAMS was much more cost-effective and easier to use. JAMS allowed us to centralize our job scheduling more fully. Converting from our previous, very limited scheduler to JAMS would be far more accessible than Automox.
Chose JAMS
N/A. I don't have any experience with different Job Management Software. Since JAMS is capable of doing most of our daily operations, we didn't look for other software. I can say that JAMS perfectly fits with us and with our clients. I've only heard about Direct M, which, based …
Stonebranch

No answer on this topic

Features
JAMSStonebranch
Workload Automation
Comparison of Workload Automation features of Product A and Product B
JAMS
7.4
Ratings
11% below category average
Stonebranch
-
Ratings
Multi-platform scheduling8.10 Ratings00 Ratings
Central monitoring7.70 Ratings00 Ratings
Logging7.20 Ratings00 Ratings
Alerts and notifications8.00 Ratings00 Ratings
Analysis and visualization6.40 Ratings00 Ratings
Application integration6.80 Ratings00 Ratings
Best Alternatives
JAMSStonebranch
Small Businesses

No answers on this topic

No answers on this topic

Medium-sized Companies
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
Apache Airflow
Apache Airflow
Score 8.7 out of 10
Enterprises
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
Redwood RunMyJobs
Redwood RunMyJobs
Score 9.7 out of 10
All AlternativesView all alternativesView all alternatives
User Ratings
JAMSStonebranch
Likelihood to Recommend
7.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Likelihood to Renew
8.8
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Usability
8.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Availability
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Performance
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Support Rating
8.0
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
In-Person Training
7.3
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Implementation Rating
8.2
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Configurability
8.1
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Ease of integration
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Product Scalability
7.5
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor post-sale
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
Vendor pre-sale
8.6
(0 ratings)
-
(0 ratings)
User Testimonials
JAMSStonebranch
Likelihood to Recommend
It's currently one of the best of the lower entry cost options out there, as it currently is a set license cost, not based on the number of jobs executed. In the hands of a good script writer and users with workflow experience, it's a powerful tool to accomplish just about any process that you have a need to complete.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Pros
  • The Activity Monitor clearly shows the Running Jobs, and Jobs that are to run soon. Successful Jobs can be viewed as well. The Refresh of this monitor is completely customizable to your liking.
  • Job Definitions are very well organized by use of Folders. This simplifies the structure of how to best Implement JAMS Jobs, including the ability to provide specific properties on each folder - whereby Jobs will inherit these properties.
  • Connectivity to servers is well thought out by having Shortcuts to include Credentials and Connection Store for server information.
  • JAMS Jobs can be controlled via System Resources. This is very powerful and is a very useful configuration found in JAMS.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Cons
  • Would love to see JAMS become a SaaS type of product instead of needing to be hosted by ourselves
  • having lots of jobs in the monitor area can lead to performance issues when running the client locally
  • dashboard and reporting tools could be more user friendly and provide more functionality to help monitoring teams spot recurring issues easily
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Likelihood to Renew
We have built JAMS into our scheduling process. Its a great scheduling tool. I'm not 100% on the execution side as we have had issues with what i'll refer to as compatibility issues with ssis variables, but it executes sql agent jobs perfectly, so when i have an issue i create a sql agent job and have JAMS execute the sql agent job on the schedule from JAMS
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Usability
9/10 as there are so many features I have not tried as of yet. It is easy to get started but as jobs become more complex you tend to employ more and more features - Some of which can be complicated at first. This all comes down to experience using the system. Out first setup and current setup are vastly different as we learn how to use the full power.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Reliability and Availability
We didnt really encounter any downtime, no issues encountered during 2 years of use of JAMs also our client barely raise an issue with JAMS, mostly the issues is on the batch jobs that jams executes. So I would gave it a perfect 10, very reliable hardly encounters any error and bug
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Performance
JAMS performance is very great, there are no issues raised with the performance, it just like nothing happens on the job after integration it gives you this monitoring capability, no reports and bugs raised on the performance, we didnt do integration with other software only database and with use of JAMS agent to different servers
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Support Rating
I am giving support an 11, the turn around time is insane. At times I get a reply in minutes. The directions to fix are precise and easy to follow. They are personable and friendly and never treat me less than they would a fortune 500 company (which I am not one of).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
In-Person Training
People that were involved in the POC found the training a lot easier to follow. I think most people would have preferred to just get the training material and run through themselves.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Implementation Rating
I Was not part of the original Implementation, and the persons did that are no longer with the Organization. But I was part of the recent Upgrade process a year ago and I am the JAMS admin and was very pleased
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Alternatives Considered
JAMS is the legacy product in our
on-premises environment. Accenture has recently implemented MyWizard, the preferred platform for future operations, which is expected to progressively
replace JAMS as part of our broader cloud migration strategy. Given this
direction, it is currently unclear whether JAMS will remain a viable long-term
option, and ongoing development is primarily focused on MyWizard.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Scalability
The product is quite flexible. There are a number of features and functions that we use on a daily basis, and there are many features that are available that we have not yet needed or explored (like setting up jobs with the ability to do FTP or Sftp file transfers).
Read full review
No answers on this topic
Return on Investment
  • SOX auditing has been part automated saving days of work for the people involved.
  • The ability for jobs to react to different failure values has enabled us to do away with overnight human monitoring ultimately contributing to saving us in the 6 figures.
Read full review
No answers on this topic
ScreenShots

JAMS Screenshots

Screenshot of the Centralized Job Repository - here users store job definitions, schedules, and parameters in one central database.Screenshot of the Job Monitor - this displays the status of jobs and workloads from one central monitoring console. Viewers can drill down on individual jobs to diagnose failures, dependencies, and expected completion times.Screenshot of a Dashboard - Here, users can create data-rich visuals to monitor critical batch jobs and workflows running on various agents and on different business applications.Screenshot of the Centralized Job Repository - Stores job definitions, schedules, and parameters in a central database.Screenshot of the Visual Job Editor - a drag and drop editor for tasks is used to build multistep workflows that include dependencies, user input, parallel processes, and triggers.

Stonebranch Screenshots

Screenshot of Drag & Drop InterfaceScreenshot of Integrated DashboardsScreenshot of User Definition