JAMS Pricing

The reliability of the system is its greatest value. After that, the JAMS support team is the best I've experienced. They are

currently one of the best of the lower entry cost options out there, as it currently is a set license cost, not based on the number of jobs executed. In … JAMS fulfilled the same automation functionality at a far less cost and in a simplified licensing model.

the people involved. The ability for jobs to react to different failure values has enabled us to do away with overnight human monitoring ultimately contributing

Agents added on demand and/or redeployed if required. Marginally more expensive than legacy solution.

JAMS reduced running cost a lot. JAMS can be tailored to fit different areas of responsibility and

Training is quite expensive and could be streamlined adding GoAnywhere SFTP product as an add-on module … our mainframe application there will be savings, but this was not purely a cost saving exercise but more of an enabling function

JAMS was less expensive than our previous Schedler. JAMS is far easier to use than other products … different ways of scheduling jobs have made it not only easier but also much more cost-effective. … JAMS was much more cost-effective and easier to use. JAMS allowed…

the cost is too high for the number of Jobs we would have to look at alternatives as we scale up … We had looked at alternatives at a lower price when … most likely competitor had a much much higher number of Jobs for a lower cost but the features it was missing in…

reference these values from the folder they are contained in, so we can easily copy a job from DEV to TEST and the source is the same but the values passed from

Tidal is a very good scheduler but very expensive and customers can't budget for this. REvScheduler is a lot cheaper but the interface isn't very aesthetics … high availability solutions ensuring minimal interruptions. Competitive pricing with other products making it a preferred…

only heard about Direct M, which, based on our different clients, is very expensive compared to JAMS. … software that has direct integration with JAMS, inquire first the additional price for the integration and if there are sample jobs defined for quick understanding

We received license renew invoice, the price jumps 150%, it is too much

Reduce the cost of a scheduler. It makes OS patching more difficult. Easier to navigate than … JAMS is less expensive, support is easier to work with, and patching is much easier.

used to have Control-M but replaced it with JAMS for better features and cost.

some other minor criteria, needs to be selected. However, I hard-code that value and make a copy of the job for each instance needed, which is redundant and

reliability simple interface reduce cost

progress between runs of the same job: count of orders processed, API Skip values when retrieving orders, when the API call only returns X amount per call

Again, we're a small firm, but can afford JAMS and get tools that are often targeted (and priced) for significantly larger organizations. … For us, JAMS has a great balance of price and functionality.

ideal tool for handling our automation, queue, and scheduling needs. We valued proactive and clear communication, and our dedicated JAMS account manager

Reduced cost One single platform Boosted productivity

Price is a huge factor and how licenses work due to the large amount of JAMS jobs

Reduced cost due to far fewer man-hours on failure management Smaller code base due to

includes a (working) Web Interface. This licensing is SME-friendly (good value) based on a very practical metric, jobs run per day. It can allow unlimited

once a day; then Windows Scheduler would be much more cost-effective. … JAMS was not the most cost-effective solution to the original program we were implementing … provide using it's power and flexibility to enhance other program areas. The cost-model from MVPSI has…