Microsoft Defender for Cloud

“Advance Threat protection to all Azure and Non-Azure resources Pricing is affordable Should enlist hybrid server plan. … Also its pricing is comparatively affordable then Other cloud security tools available in the market.”

“The licensing structure could be better by providing possibilities for partial deployment in a subscription The information in the dashboards are sometimes scattered, there should be a better overall...”

“Positive return on investment on the basis that it's part of or included within the E5 license that we've got for the business.”

“It's specific to just Azure, but I think that it works and it's saving us cost because some of the third party tools are really expensive.”

“Any CNAPP, ASPM, or CSPM tool will cost a minimum of $150,000 for a large enterprise.”

“It should allow teams to focus on critical findings and help them keep aside low-severity or suppressed vulnerabilities Pricing can be improved as it can be over-priced for smaller businesses and... … Less Appropriate - Considering the premium and unpredictable pricing, it would be less appropriate for startups and small organizations.”

“I think one of the opportunities we have identified is around the use-based model and the cost model, because we usually need to address consumption guarantees, since in the cloud these cost models...”

“It is a little expensive where the clients have to work this around in their budget.”

“Since we've onboarded our A5 security license, we've got a lot more correlative value out of all the Microsoft Suite, so that's huge.”

“Microsoft defender for cloud has greatly helped us to save cost for more than 200-300$ as it perfectly integrated with our resources.”

“Clearer cost breakdowns and predictions would help organizations budget more effectively. … The subscription costs associated with Defender for Cloud can add to an organization's operational expenses, impacting ROI.”